GNU bug report logs - #73096
A guile package for SRFI-235.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Yuval Langer <yuval.langer <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2024 13:03:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 73096 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 73096 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#73096; Package guix-patches. (Sat, 07 Sep 2024 13:03:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Yuval Langer <yuval.langer <at> gmail.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to guix-patches <at> gnu.org. (Sat, 07 Sep 2024 13:03:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Yuval Langer <yuval.langer <at> gmail.com>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: A guile package for SRFI-235.
Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2024 16:02:06 +0300
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi,

here's my package definition for SRFI-235.

Please review!

Many thanks,
Yuval Langer.
[0001-Add-guile-srfi-235.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#73096; Package guix-patches. (Sat, 07 Sep 2024 19:27:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 73096 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>
To: 73096 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Yuval Langer <yuval.langer <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: A guile package for SRFI-235.
Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2024 14:25:53 -0500
Hi,

Can you send a v2 with a proper commit message?

See the commit history for examples.

-- 
all the best,
jgart




Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#73096; Package guix-patches. (Sat, 07 Sep 2024 22:23:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #11 received at 73096 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Yuval Langer <yuval.langer <at> gmail.com>
To: 73096 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>
Subject: Re: A guile package for SRFI-235.
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2024 01:20:30 +0300
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Sat, Sep 7, 2024 at 10:26 PM jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Can you send a v2 with a proper commit message?

Sorry about that.

> See the commit history for examples.

Took from myself.

> --
> all the best,
> jgart

And again sorry for sending to you instead of the mailing list.  Not
used to debbug's process.
[0001-gnu-Add-guile-srfi-235.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

Information forwarded to guix-patches <at> gnu.org:
bug#73096; Package guix-patches. (Sun, 08 Sep 2024 04:05:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #14 received at 73096 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Yuval Langer <yuval.langer <at> gmail.com>
To: 73096 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: A guile package for SRFI-235.
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2024 07:02:45 +0300
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Friend (robin on Libera) just noticed I didn't remove the
gnu:packages:guile: prefix I use for my own Guix channel.  Uploading
the hopefully final version of this patch.
[0001-gnu-Add-guile-srfi-235.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

Reply sent to jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>:
You have taken responsibility. (Mon, 09 Sep 2024 18:19:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Yuval Langer <yuval.langer <at> gmail.com>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Mon, 09 Sep 2024 18:19:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #19 received at 73096-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>
To: 73096-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>, Yuval Langer <yuval.langer <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: A guile package for SRFI-235.
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2024 13:17:57 -0500
Applied, thanks!

I tested with the following in a REPL:

scheme@(guile-user)> ,use(srfi srfi-235)
scheme@(guile-user)> (if-procedure #t (lambda () 1) (lambda () 2))
$1 = 1
#<unspecified>
scheme@(guile-user)> (if-procedure #f (lambda () 1) (lambda () 2))
$2 = 2
#<unspecified>

-- 
all the best,
jgart




bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Tue, 08 Oct 2024 11:24:18 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 347 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.