GNU bug report logs - #73073
[PATCH 0/6] Allow origin with label as inputs.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>

Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 15:52:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: moreinfo, patch

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #151 received at 73073 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Josselin Poiret <dev <at> jpoiret.xyz>, 73073 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe <at> gnu.org>, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>,
 Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>, Christopher Baines <guix <at> cbaines.net>,
 Nicolas Goaziou <guix <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>,
 Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [bug#73073] [PATCH v3 1/8] packages: Use origin file names as
 their input labels.
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2024 22:54:30 +0100
Hi,

Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> skribis:

> Well, we need 1. to clarify what means "core-packages" today and 2. how to
> deal with world-rebuilds packages.

The scope of ‘core-packages’ is defined in teams.scm.

Regarding #2, what do we mean by “world rebuild”?  30K? 20K? 10K?
I think the phrase is colloquially understood as “a lot of rebuilds”,
usually meaning more than 5K per architecture.  With this magnitude,
world rebuilds are now commonplace.

The way to deal with such changes is documented and working relatively
well though (info "(guix) Managing Patches and Branches").  The key
insight from experience over the past years is that we must avoid scope
creep and instead have focused branches.

Ludo’.




This bug report was last modified 237 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.