GNU bug report logs - #73073
[PATCH 0/6] Allow origin with label as inputs.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>

Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 15:52:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: moreinfo, patch

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: Josselin Poiret <dev <at> jpoiret.xyz>, 73073 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe <at> gnu.org>, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>, Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>, Christopher Baines <guix <at> cbaines.net>, Nicolas Goaziou <guix <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>, Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke <at> gnu.org>
Subject: [bug#73073] [PATCH v3 1/8] packages: Use origin file names as their input labels.
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 12:51:25 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi Ludo,

On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 at 12:20, Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote:

> This is not in the scope of ‘core-packages’.  (It would be a good fit
> for a texlive team branch, I suppose.)

Well, we need 1. to clarify what means "core-packages" today and 2. how to
deal with world-rebuilds packages.

For sure, I agree that the scope  'core-packages' must be clearly bounded
to a restricted set of packages.

However, today we are currently running a world-rebuild, right?  Because
the branch 'core-packages' (it could be another one).  So if fixing the
workaround goes to texlive team branch then it will also triggers a
world-rebuild one day when this branch will be fully rebuilt.  I.e., weeks
later, we will do again yet-another a world-rebuild.

My point of view is: today we know how to fix it and the fix will improve
the situation for the good and once for all, so I consider the workaround a
waste of (electrical) resource.  I mean, it's only because we don't know
how to deal this situation in the frame of the new team branch organisation.

Therefore, I would take that example as an opportunity to clarify #2.
(That's one the reason why the series was "dormant", because I did not have
the energy and bandwidth to engage this discussion. :-))

Cheers,
simon
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 237 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.