GNU bug report logs - #73073
[PATCH 0/6] Allow origin with label as inputs.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>

Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 15:52:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: moreinfo, patch

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #127 received at 73073 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Josselin Poiret <dev <at> jpoiret.xyz>, 73073 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe <at> gnu.org>, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>,
 Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>, Christopher Baines <guix <at> cbaines.net>,
 Nicolas Goaziou <guix <at> nicolasgoaziou.fr>,
 Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [bug#73073] [PATCH v3 1/8] packages: Use origin file names as
 their input labels.
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 12:19:43 +0100
Hi,

Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> skribis:

> On Wed, 04 Dec 2024 at 18:54, Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> +    (inputs `(("_"
>> +               ;; Note: The "_" label above is here to avoid a full rebuild.
>> +               ;; TODO: Remove it on next rebuild cycle.
>
> [...]
>
>> +     ;; TODO: Remove input labels on next rebuild cycle.
>> +     `(("ruby" ,ruby-2.7)
>> +       ("ruby-hydra-minimal" ,ruby-hydra-minimal/pinned)
>> +       ;; Build phase requires "docstrip.tex" from TEXLIVE-LATEX.
>> +       ;; However, adding this package to native inputs would initiate
>> +       ;; a circular dependency.  To work around this, use TEXLIVE-LATEX
>> +       ;; source, then add "docstrip.tex" to TEXINPUTS before build.
>> +       ("_" ,(package-source texlive-latex))
>> +       ("texlive-tex" ,texlive-tex)))
>
> Well, I was awaiting a “core-update” cycle to avoid to introduce such
> and fix all at once.  But I have missed the previous (and last?)
> “core-updates” merge.  Arf!

I think it’s okay to have workarounds like the one above as a stopgap.
We’ll improve that eventually, that’s fine.

> That’s said, IIRC, the ’core-packages’ branch is currently built, right?
> Why not remove it on the the top of it?

This is not in the scope of ‘core-packages’.  (It would be a good fit
for a texlive team branch, I suppose.)

Ludo’.




This bug report was last modified 237 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.