GNU bug report logs - #73067
kmime-24.05.2 test failure

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Marek Paśnikowski <marek <at> marekpasnikowski.pl>
Subject: bug#73067: closed (Re: bug#73067: kmime-24.05.2 test failure)
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2024 16:37:03 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your bug report

#73067: kmime-24.05.2 test failure

which was filed against the guix package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 73067 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
73067: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=73067
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Zheng Junjie <zhengjunjie <at> iscas.ac.cn>
To: Marek Paśnikowski via Bug reports for GNU Guix
 <bug-guix <at> gnu.org>
Cc: Marek Paśnikowski <marek <at> marekpasnikowski.pl>,
 73067-close <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#73067: kmime-24.05.2 test failure
Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2024 00:36:38 +0800

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

Marek Paśnikowski via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix <at> gnu.org> writes:

> Dear Zheng
>
> Thank you for your hard work bringing KDE to Guix.  It is not the best
> circumstance to express my gratitude, but I want you to know I am
> grateful before anything else.
>
> With commit 2f407ac162d6b9053bafb611ff20b58b13e7a09c to guix, you have
> modified the testing phase of kmime build, which I currently suspect as
> the reason for the inability to reconfigure my systems.  I also suspect
> the recent merge of core-updates could have caused this breakage.

This is caused by core-updates, I don't know why, just disable it should
be OK, see 643e7ecbe6079e8cc2275cc6cdf1cda04f6f818a.

>
> For your convenience, here is the link to the bug report:
> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/73067
> It contains the build output narrowed to the check phase.
>
> Do you think this could be at least worked around relatively quickly?  I
> will do my best to assist with the review process.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Marek Paśnikowski <marek <at> marekpasnikowski.pl>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: kmime-24.05.2 test failure
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2024 14:04:21 +0200

I am not able to reconfigure my system due to the following regression
in kmime-24.05.2:

starting phase `check'
Running tests...
/gnu/store/ibgy9qa52zqmbcfp6m8rwj81bffaiwvb-cmake-minimal-3.24.2/bin/ctest --force-new-ctest-process 
Test project /tmp/guix-build-kmime-24.05.2.drv-0/build
      Start  1: kmime-rfc2047test
 1/17 Test  #1: kmime-rfc2047test ................   Passed    0.01 sec
      Start  2: kmime-utiltest
 2/17 Test  #2: kmime-utiltest ...................   Passed    0.22 sec
      Start  3: kmime-contentindextest
 3/17 Test  #3: kmime-contentindextest ...........   Passed    0.01 sec
      Start  4: kmime-charfreqtest
 4/17 Test  #4: kmime-charfreqtest ...............   Passed    0.01 sec
      Start  5: kmime-headertest
 5/17 Test  #5: kmime-headertest .................   Passed    0.01 sec
      Start  6: kmime-contenttest
 6/17 Test  #6: kmime-contenttest ................   Passed    0.01 sec
      Start  7: kmime-messagetest
 7/17 Test  #7: kmime-messagetest ................   Passed    0.01 sec
      Start  8: kmime-headerfactorytest
 8/17 Test  #8: kmime-headerfactorytest ..........   Passed    0.01 sec
      Start  9: kmime-rfc2231test
 9/17 Test  #9: kmime-rfc2231test ................   Passed    0.01 sec
      Start 10: kmime-sizetest
10/17 Test #10: kmime-sizetest ...................   Passed    0.01 sec
      Start 11: kmime-parsedatetimetest
11/17 Test #11: kmime-parsedatetimetest ..........   Passed    0.01 sec
      Start 12: kmime-dateformattertest
12/17 Test #12: kmime-dateformattertest ..........***Failed    0.02 sec
********* Start testing of DateFormatterTest *********
Config: Using QtTest library 6.6.3, Qt 6.6.3 (x86_64-little_endian-lp64 shared (dynamic) release build; by GCC 11.4.0), unknown unknown
PASS   : DateFormatterTest::initTestCase()
FAIL!  : DateFormatterTest::testFancyFormat() Compared values are not the same
   Actual   (f.dateString(dt)) : "Today 12:34:56"
   Expected (u"Today 12:34 PM"): Today 12:34 PM
   Loc: [/tmp/guix-build-kmime-24.05.2.drv-0/kmime-24.05.2/autotests/dateformattertest.cpp(27)]
PASS   : DateFormatterTest::testLocalizedFormat()
PASS   : DateFormatterTest::testFormat(ctime)
PASS   : DateFormatterTest::testCustomFormat()
PASS   : DateFormatterTest::cleanupTestCase()
Totals: 5 passed, 1 failed, 0 skipped, 0 blacklisted, 8ms
********* Finished testing of DateFormatterTest *********

      Start 13: kmime-attachmenttest
13/17 Test #13: kmime-attachmenttest .............   Passed    0.01 sec
      Start 14: kmime-typestest
14/17 Test #14: kmime-typestest ..................   Passed    0.01 sec
      Start 15: test_mdn
15/17 Test #15: test_mdn .........................   Passed    0.01 sec
      Start 16: test_charfreq
16/17 Test #16: test_charfreq ....................   Passed    0.00 sec
      Start 17: test_dates
17/17 Test #17: test_dates .......................   Passed    0.01 sec

94% tests passed, 1 tests failed out of 17

Total Test time (real) =   0.40 sec

The following tests FAILED:
         12 - kmime-dateformattertest (Failed)
Errors while running CTest
make: *** [Makefile:74: test] Error 8

Test suite failed, dumping logs.
error: in phase 'check': uncaught exception:
%exception #<&invoke-error program: "make" arguments: ("test" "-j" "8") exit-status: 2 term-signal: #f stop-signal: #f> 
phase `check' failed after 0.4 seconds

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.