GNU bug report logs - #73067
kmime-24.05.2 test failure

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Zheng Junjie <zhengjunjie <at> iscas.ac.cn>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#73067: closed (kmime-24.05.2 test failure)
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2024 16:37:03 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Sat, 07 Sep 2024 00:36:38 +0800
with message-id <87zfokzqll.fsf <at> iscas.ac.cn>
and subject line Re: bug#73067: kmime-24.05.2 test failure
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #73067,
regarding kmime-24.05.2 test failure
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
73067: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=73067
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Marek Paśnikowski <marek <at> marekpasnikowski.pl>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: kmime-24.05.2 test failure
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2024 14:04:21 +0200

I am not able to reconfigure my system due to the following regression
in kmime-24.05.2:

starting phase `check'
Running tests...
/gnu/store/ibgy9qa52zqmbcfp6m8rwj81bffaiwvb-cmake-minimal-3.24.2/bin/ctest --force-new-ctest-process 
Test project /tmp/guix-build-kmime-24.05.2.drv-0/build
      Start  1: kmime-rfc2047test
 1/17 Test  #1: kmime-rfc2047test ................   Passed    0.01 sec
      Start  2: kmime-utiltest
 2/17 Test  #2: kmime-utiltest ...................   Passed    0.22 sec
      Start  3: kmime-contentindextest
 3/17 Test  #3: kmime-contentindextest ...........   Passed    0.01 sec
      Start  4: kmime-charfreqtest
 4/17 Test  #4: kmime-charfreqtest ...............   Passed    0.01 sec
      Start  5: kmime-headertest
 5/17 Test  #5: kmime-headertest .................   Passed    0.01 sec
      Start  6: kmime-contenttest
 6/17 Test  #6: kmime-contenttest ................   Passed    0.01 sec
      Start  7: kmime-messagetest
 7/17 Test  #7: kmime-messagetest ................   Passed    0.01 sec
      Start  8: kmime-headerfactorytest
 8/17 Test  #8: kmime-headerfactorytest ..........   Passed    0.01 sec
      Start  9: kmime-rfc2231test
 9/17 Test  #9: kmime-rfc2231test ................   Passed    0.01 sec
      Start 10: kmime-sizetest
10/17 Test #10: kmime-sizetest ...................   Passed    0.01 sec
      Start 11: kmime-parsedatetimetest
11/17 Test #11: kmime-parsedatetimetest ..........   Passed    0.01 sec
      Start 12: kmime-dateformattertest
12/17 Test #12: kmime-dateformattertest ..........***Failed    0.02 sec
********* Start testing of DateFormatterTest *********
Config: Using QtTest library 6.6.3, Qt 6.6.3 (x86_64-little_endian-lp64 shared (dynamic) release build; by GCC 11.4.0), unknown unknown
PASS   : DateFormatterTest::initTestCase()
FAIL!  : DateFormatterTest::testFancyFormat() Compared values are not the same
   Actual   (f.dateString(dt)) : "Today 12:34:56"
   Expected (u"Today 12:34 PM"): Today 12:34 PM
   Loc: [/tmp/guix-build-kmime-24.05.2.drv-0/kmime-24.05.2/autotests/dateformattertest.cpp(27)]
PASS   : DateFormatterTest::testLocalizedFormat()
PASS   : DateFormatterTest::testFormat(ctime)
PASS   : DateFormatterTest::testCustomFormat()
PASS   : DateFormatterTest::cleanupTestCase()
Totals: 5 passed, 1 failed, 0 skipped, 0 blacklisted, 8ms
********* Finished testing of DateFormatterTest *********

      Start 13: kmime-attachmenttest
13/17 Test #13: kmime-attachmenttest .............   Passed    0.01 sec
      Start 14: kmime-typestest
14/17 Test #14: kmime-typestest ..................   Passed    0.01 sec
      Start 15: test_mdn
15/17 Test #15: test_mdn .........................   Passed    0.01 sec
      Start 16: test_charfreq
16/17 Test #16: test_charfreq ....................   Passed    0.00 sec
      Start 17: test_dates
17/17 Test #17: test_dates .......................   Passed    0.01 sec

94% tests passed, 1 tests failed out of 17

Total Test time (real) =   0.40 sec

The following tests FAILED:
         12 - kmime-dateformattertest (Failed)
Errors while running CTest
make: *** [Makefile:74: test] Error 8

Test suite failed, dumping logs.
error: in phase 'check': uncaught exception:
%exception #<&invoke-error program: "make" arguments: ("test" "-j" "8") exit-status: 2 term-signal: #f stop-signal: #f> 
phase `check' failed after 0.4 seconds

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Zheng Junjie <zhengjunjie <at> iscas.ac.cn>
To: Marek Paśnikowski via Bug reports for GNU Guix
 <bug-guix <at> gnu.org>
Cc: Marek Paśnikowski <marek <at> marekpasnikowski.pl>,
 73067-close <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#73067: kmime-24.05.2 test failure
Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2024 00:36:38 +0800

[Message part 4 (text/plain, inline)]

Marek Paśnikowski via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix <at> gnu.org> writes:

> Dear Zheng
>
> Thank you for your hard work bringing KDE to Guix.  It is not the best
> circumstance to express my gratitude, but I want you to know I am
> grateful before anything else.
>
> With commit 2f407ac162d6b9053bafb611ff20b58b13e7a09c to guix, you have
> modified the testing phase of kmime build, which I currently suspect as
> the reason for the inability to reconfigure my systems.  I also suspect
> the recent merge of core-updates could have caused this breakage.

This is caused by core-updates, I don't know why, just disable it should
be OK, see 643e7ecbe6079e8cc2275cc6cdf1cda04f6f818a.

>
> For your convenience, here is the link to the bug report:
> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/73067
> It contains the build output narrowed to the check phase.
>
> Do you think this could be at least worked around relatively quickly?  I
> will do my best to assist with the review process.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.