From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 06 09:03:00 2024 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Sep 2024 13:03:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52440 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1smYc7-0005oK-Ld for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2024 09:03:00 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:57650) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1smXhW-0002P3-Bj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2024 08:04:30 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1smXhW-0000uN-Oj for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2024 08:04:30 -0400 Received: from [81.190.248.246] (helo=marekpasnikowski.pl) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1smXhU-0008JZ-77 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2024 08:04:30 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.local [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id c2e5c4a7 for ; Fri, 6 Sep 2024 12:04:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=marekpasnikowski.pl; h= from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=dkim; bh=Gv+vxljmtXnEvtd+L+G7OZqVR DvGH9jwNP+jHlaB4vw=; b=HchkV3PYsHoZJV35Pt0OUojCEmY4qssJeXzr3Ajc9 Kze2K5W3AGXXs4fX44Xc4olgFS31cqpkFl8Q+to5jHfDP1AVMlK4SCQz4wVOtkz/ eV1X+m1vM4TRDWJyxKJcTcCUzXxVCYTC1CwwADb9mjVqCOFQw7Rzwkn7gPNMvamT 0NaAX0obeAUDNMbOMlEZeJVFx8a5pld3duOGyh/xJz1bmhoyzIJG4Wj+S/4MAVwV banwkkJQaHqOfxoI5nAVzGmLi+nz5Y95U3I4lAqsT2iuNizAZ8q4xkqTCZxmY710 8UsxpZQlTmK7P396veOHY8s4GScR75oQhyNlmrYHBCDiA== Received: by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id e6e33734 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for ; Fri, 6 Sep 2024 12:04:21 +0000 (UTC) From: =?utf-8?Q?Marek_Pa=C5=9Bnikowski?= To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: kmime-24.05.2 test failure Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2024 14:04:21 +0200 Message-ID: <87ttetm1iy.fsf@marekpasnikowski.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 81.190.248.246 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=81.190.248.246; envelope-from=marek@marekpasnikowski.pl; helo=marekpasnikowski.pl X-Spam_score_int: -12 X-Spam_score: -1.3 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 06 Sep 2024 09:02:58 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) I am not able to reconfigure my system due to the following regression in kmime-24.05.2: starting phase `check' Running tests... /gnu/store/ibgy9qa52zqmbcfp6m8rwj81bffaiwvb-cmake-minimal-3.24.2/bin/ctest = --force-new-ctest-process=20 Test project /tmp/guix-build-kmime-24.05.2.drv-0/build Start 1: kmime-rfc2047test 1/17 Test #1: kmime-rfc2047test ................ Passed 0.01 sec Start 2: kmime-utiltest 2/17 Test #2: kmime-utiltest ................... Passed 0.22 sec Start 3: kmime-contentindextest 3/17 Test #3: kmime-contentindextest ........... Passed 0.01 sec Start 4: kmime-charfreqtest 4/17 Test #4: kmime-charfreqtest ............... Passed 0.01 sec Start 5: kmime-headertest 5/17 Test #5: kmime-headertest ................. Passed 0.01 sec Start 6: kmime-contenttest 6/17 Test #6: kmime-contenttest ................ Passed 0.01 sec Start 7: kmime-messagetest 7/17 Test #7: kmime-messagetest ................ Passed 0.01 sec Start 8: kmime-headerfactorytest 8/17 Test #8: kmime-headerfactorytest .......... Passed 0.01 sec Start 9: kmime-rfc2231test 9/17 Test #9: kmime-rfc2231test ................ Passed 0.01 sec Start 10: kmime-sizetest 10/17 Test #10: kmime-sizetest ................... Passed 0.01 sec Start 11: kmime-parsedatetimetest 11/17 Test #11: kmime-parsedatetimetest .......... Passed 0.01 sec Start 12: kmime-dateformattertest 12/17 Test #12: kmime-dateformattertest ..........***Failed 0.02 sec ********* Start testing of DateFormatterTest ********* Config: Using QtTest library 6.6.3, Qt 6.6.3 (x86_64-little_endian-lp64 sha= red (dynamic) release build; by GCC 11.4.0), unknown unknown PASS : DateFormatterTest::initTestCase() FAIL! : DateFormatterTest::testFancyFormat() Compared values are not the s= ame Actual (f.dateString(dt)) : "Today 12:34:56" Expected (u"Today 12:34=E2=80=AFPM"): Today 12:34=E2=80=AFPM Loc: [/tmp/guix-build-kmime-24.05.2.drv-0/kmime-24.05.2/autotests/datefo= rmattertest.cpp(27)] PASS : DateFormatterTest::testLocalizedFormat() PASS : DateFormatterTest::testFormat(ctime) PASS : DateFormatterTest::testCustomFormat() PASS : DateFormatterTest::cleanupTestCase() Totals: 5 passed, 1 failed, 0 skipped, 0 blacklisted, 8ms ********* Finished testing of DateFormatterTest ********* Start 13: kmime-attachmenttest 13/17 Test #13: kmime-attachmenttest ............. Passed 0.01 sec Start 14: kmime-typestest 14/17 Test #14: kmime-typestest .................. Passed 0.01 sec Start 15: test_mdn 15/17 Test #15: test_mdn ......................... Passed 0.01 sec Start 16: test_charfreq 16/17 Test #16: test_charfreq .................... Passed 0.00 sec Start 17: test_dates 17/17 Test #17: test_dates ....................... Passed 0.01 sec 94% tests passed, 1 tests failed out of 17 Total Test time (real) =3D 0.40 sec The following tests FAILED: 12 - kmime-dateformattertest (Failed) Errors while running CTest make: *** [Makefile:74: test] Error 8 Test suite failed, dumping logs. error: in phase 'check': uncaught exception: %exception #<&invoke-error program: "make" arguments: ("test" "-j" "8") exi= t-status: 2 term-signal: #f stop-signal: #f>=20 phase `check' failed after 0.4 seconds From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 06 11:21:15 2024 Received: (at 73067) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Sep 2024 15:21:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53867 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1smalu-0005rv-Dt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2024 11:21:15 -0400 Received: from [81.190.248.246] (port=58130 helo=marekpasnikowski.pl) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1smaND-0004Nt-H6 for 73067@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2024 10:55:44 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.local [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 857baefd; Fri, 6 Sep 2024 14:55:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=marekpasnikowski.pl; h= from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=dkim; bh=84XT68vo+IjeFopai4ZPXmVTc j6m4aWVCM0zyB/L1vc=; b=OtuBId8X4PAVCgl4OWXEihbTU1nkrosEdPKj6+bG5 kvf2QQ9Vr9ThFpW/WC0FryuZ0e68kQVIUmHM+nTAC0/Jge0CIDgwOes1hqgSOBX0 Jgpvb3uFA04yFVUmydgWjNylEOAym7bcGOu9BFJEqNvZsS+IAZ64oWhVw0JkVk7N MLsvM3mm2BUB1yYeBlUVV3hiQl7GEh9q3jZe2hL4KCxH0rsGPPgJsUE+yHc2SmiK VnkaX0XdHFV2pN/hVP9jnkm9QMTpYCbgOWd23XEc55q49bOqi7STKtVpwJ2tVnQH jAT48Tc9KePqvOtvohkmExyNsj2xN0yVN0xvU7FrIn8CA== Received: by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 22ceba07 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Fri, 6 Sep 2024 14:55:39 +0000 (UTC) From: =?utf-8?Q?Marek_Pa=C5=9Bnikowski?= To: 73067@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#73067: kmime-24.05.2 test failure In-Reply-To: <87ttetm1iy.fsf@marekpasnikowski.pl> ("Marek =?utf-8?Q?Pa?= =?utf-8?Q?=C5=9Bnikowski=22's?= message of "Fri, 06 Sep 2024 14:04:21 +0200") References: <87ttetm1iy.fsf@marekpasnikowski.pl> Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2024 16:55:39 +0200 Message-ID: <87h6as6dck.fsf@marekpasnikowski.pl> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 3.0 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Dear Zheng Thank you for your hard work bringing KDE to Guix. It is not the best circumstance to express my gratitude, but I want you to know I am grateful before anything else. With commit 2f407ac162d6b9053bafb611ff20b58b13e7a09c to guix, you have modified the testing phase of kmime build, which I currently suspect as the reason for the inability to reconfigure my systems. I [...] Content analysis details: (3.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 1.7 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist [URIs: marekpasnikowski.pl] -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. 1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 73067 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 06 Sep 2024 11:21:13 -0400 Cc: zhengjunjie@iscas.ac.cn X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Dear Zheng Thank you for your hard work bringing KDE to Guix. It is not the best circumstance to express my gratitude, but I want you to know I am grateful before anything else. With commit 2f407ac162d6b9053bafb611ff20b58b13e7a09c to guix, you have modified the testing phase of kmime build, which I currently suspect as the reason for the inability to reconfigure my systems. I [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 1.7 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist [URIs: marekpasnikowski.pl] -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. 1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager Dear Zheng Thank you for your hard work bringing KDE to Guix. It is not the best circumstance to express my gratitude, but I want you to know I am grateful before anything else. With commit 2f407ac162d6b9053bafb611ff20b58b13e7a09c to guix, you have modified the testing phase of kmime build, which I currently suspect as the reason for the inability to reconfigure my systems. I also suspect the recent merge of core-updates could have caused this breakage. For your convenience, here is the link to the bug report: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/73067 It contains the build output narrowed to the check phase. Do you think this could be at least worked around relatively quickly? I will do my best to assist with the review process. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Sep 06 12:37:01 2024 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Sep 2024 16:37:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54090 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1smbxF-0001nc-3E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2024 12:37:01 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:55154) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1smbxD-0001nT-6R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2024 12:36:59 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1smbxC-0002j7-G4 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2024 12:36:59 -0400 Received: from smtp81.cstnet.cn ([159.226.251.81] helo=cstnet.cn) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1smbx9-0004xx-KG for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Sep 2024 12:36:58 -0400 Received: from m (unknown [107.174.64.25]) by APP-03 (Coremail) with SMTP id rQCowAC3vn6YL9tmbYuVAQ--.12312S2; Sat, 07 Sep 2024 00:36:44 +0800 (CST) From: Zheng Junjie To: Marek =?utf-8?Q?Pa=C5=9Bnikowski?= via Bug reports for GNU Guix Subject: Re: bug#73067: kmime-24.05.2 test failure In-Reply-To: <87h6as6dck.fsf@marekpasnikowski.pl> ("Marek =?utf-8?Q?Pa?= =?utf-8?Q?=C5=9Bnikowski?= via Bug reports for GNU Guix"'s message of "Fri, 06 Sep 2024 16:55:39 +0200") References: <87ttetm1iy.fsf@marekpasnikowski.pl> <87h6as6dck.fsf@marekpasnikowski.pl> Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2024 00:36:38 +0800 Message-ID: <87zfokzqll.fsf@iscas.ac.cn> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-CM-TRANSID: rQCowAC3vn6YL9tmbYuVAQ--.12312S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvdXoW7Xw47Xr1xXw13ArWfXw47Jwb_yoWDJrg_uF 9rGwsrWw4kJF4akrZ3Grsxury7uanYyFy0q343GF4kWr98JrWxGFZ7Z393Gw13C39a9Fsr K3Z5X3WIywnIvjkaLaAFLSUrUUUUjb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUIcSsGvfJTRUUUbsxYjsxI4VWkKwAYFVCjjxCrM7AC8VAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1l1xkIjI8I 6I8E6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Wr0E3s1l1IIY67AEw4v_Jr0_Jr4l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM2 8CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxSw2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUCwA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0 cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVWUJVW8JwA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UM28EF7xvwVC2z2 80aVCY1x0267AKxVWUJVW8JwAa7VASzI0EjI02j7AqF2xKxVCjxxvEa2IrM2AIxVAIcxkE cVAq07x20xvEncxIr21le4C267I2x7xF54xIwI1l5I8CrVACY4xI64kE6c02F40Ex7xfMc Ij6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r18McIj6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwAm72CE4IkC6x0Yz7v_ Jr0_Gr1lF7xvr2IY64vIr41l42xK82IYc2Ij64vIr41l4I8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr 1lx2IqxVAqx4xG67AKxVWUJVWUGwC20s026x8GjcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY17CE 14v26r1Y6r17MIIYrxkI7VAKI48JMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC0I7 IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6I8E 87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26r1j6r4UYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0x ZFpf9x07jEOJOUUUUU= X-Originating-IP: [107.174.64.25] X-CM-SenderInfo: x2kh0wxmxqyx3h6l2u1dvotugofq/ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=159.226.251.81; envelope-from=zhengjunjie@iscas.ac.cn; helo=cstnet.cn X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: Marek =?utf-8?Q?Pa=C5=9Bnikowski?= , 73067-close@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Marek Pa=C5=9Bnikowski via Bug reports for GNU Guix writ= es: > Dear Zheng > > Thank you for your hard work bringing KDE to Guix. It is not the best > circumstance to express my gratitude, but I want you to know I am > grateful before anything else. > > With commit 2f407ac162d6b9053bafb611ff20b58b13e7a09c to guix, you have > modified the testing phase of kmime build, which I currently suspect as > the reason for the inability to reconfigure my systems. I also suspect > the recent merge of core-updates could have caused this breakage. This is caused by core-updates, I don't know why, just disable it should be OK, see 643e7ecbe6079e8cc2275cc6cdf1cda04f6f818a. > > For your convenience, here is the link to the bug report: > https://issues.guix.gnu.org/73067 > It contains the build output narrowed to the check phase. > > Do you think this could be at least worked around relatively quickly? I > will do my best to assist with the review process. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEfr6klGDOXiwIdX/bO1qpk+Gi3/AFAmbbL5YACgkQO1qpk+Gi 3/Dfbg/9E2uEUdx0RWCLS6m6fyDhTxMQeVPRhtHevP2RZy+zCz7ZPHPYgqhRxBm0 yIJIia5A82LZPKAGu6ejhDGS4R0AFubzdo3msP6dPH0oqZvHjEJ/uVjnDrr4lOFf pTa4ktAra6GiaNHyoKIIDY7ci+bfd+wNodCPO1Xn+I8QwGdmydZXs4ltFCRTYALV heohHqRvBtmpJ4sw1RrERhaIUVEPRyQ9JjE98KVqrN1hOzoq1zSS/rRyiGFn/b4t Qq1rgvcxEXBjrR5S4kRkX8zwlbtfFVii6po4gfSXH3CJaiuKD1WJwsU2R72rweDQ 5xifF3t53authL7i7hepO/F/do73SEHGmRbRju6peMY+X7qYwXMflAYqCl+RhwmF xIsO1uAwR+LC+mrSQJ9vgjSQH/frinplpWx8rkbNXUFVOVemjHHiWE2T4Z/t29eB 5OC5pfUTgulYRLiEwpoIwx/0/njI1hZlO4ZOA0Xf+KSJlK0BQIQoru5T62VVrnS2 RDfCB47sgBxttkdz47MKlm/WfFqqkIZOhtExbJpJLw+TygJczBVVJtKQnfJYPkNX i7IUa3V4adZ9YysPCYEIPr54HuVIbisaflYG/40ue4Vng6eyEBkRGIGLTgbU4LR1 sxzJ4V+r+ctjRRc3sEEk+QPky7zZ9QSdK+L84N1KpiYiL4WD+gM= =VQNu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Sep 07 13:26:17 2024 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Sep 2024 17:26:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57551 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1smzCT-0001D2-Hm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2024 13:26:17 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:32978) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1smzCS-0001Cv-9U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2024 13:26:16 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1smzCQ-0007kT-VV for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2024 13:26:14 -0400 Received: from [81.190.248.246] (helo=marekpasnikowski.pl) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1smzCN-0006J1-F6 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Sep 2024 13:26:14 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.local [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id aa071dc5; Sat, 7 Sep 2024 17:26:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=marekpasnikowski.pl; h= from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=dkim; bh=PzIm4pfeyas3xug+KLCqii/Hx yRupvgXNy1R3DBGgt4=; b=Yd1St86nAlvDwxyYy8iouhmtsNUT54VWiyqhf93WC oS/kym1U70iG/a5Uim6znfBorEWfKt6q1IckkTcDdihTeG57bgEq8JM1I+b/viLD 5jGOJSlyEoBQbeiTRqwssas+T7l/+QV380bj7sh0K+DIDu3aQ3lhtpQ+jVpWcn09 SujtIObqRvEVAqDiuSfJq0KYjHCxOuk8jQhCJ6THxrMnmuFbHDrt8meN+RIOobEI Kx8GTW8Kph+0rqlhQFnrMg3GYW8xXgVhYaNKoOwD8DoJiTV9DZQDibhRgeQ6bTIj q+B6hJPoPy9DPJZltfaTP/I8/qAkDELFBJIAxL1cWNHAQ== Received: by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 1426ecad (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Sat, 7 Sep 2024 17:26:05 +0000 (UTC) From: =?utf-8?Q?Marek_Pa=C5=9Bnikowski?= To: Zheng Junjie Subject: Re: bug#73067: kmime-24.05.2 test failure In-Reply-To: <87zfokzqll.fsf@iscas.ac.cn> (Zheng Junjie's message of "Sat, 07 Sep 2024 00:36:38 +0800") References: <87ttetm1iy.fsf@marekpasnikowski.pl> <87h6as6dck.fsf@marekpasnikowski.pl> <87zfokzqll.fsf@iscas.ac.cn> Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2024 19:26:04 +0200 Message-ID: <87le03wf2r.fsf@marekpasnikowski.pl> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 81.190.248.246 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=81.190.248.246; envelope-from=marek@marekpasnikowski.pl; helo=marekpasnikowski.pl X-Spam_score_int: -12 X-Spam_score: -1.3 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: Marek =?utf-8?Q?Pa=C5=9Bnikowski?= via Bug reports for GNU Guix , 73067-close@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Thank you very much for quick response. I confirm I was able to finish reconfiguration of my systems. I wish you all the best. From unknown Sat Jun 21 10:35:00 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2024 11:24:10 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator