From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Sep 04 03:24:37 2024 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Sep 2024 07:24:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33229 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1slkNY-00080j-PL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2024 03:24:37 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:40990) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sliQN-0004Vm-UD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2024 01:19:25 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sliPL-0004x7-Gs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2024 01:18:19 -0400 Received: from smtpout1.mo12.mail-out.ovh.ca ([51.161.45.254]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sliPJ-0000lH-H2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2024 01:18:19 -0400 Received: from mxplan1.mail.ovh.ca (unknown [10.111.38.194]) by mo12.mail-out.ovh.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Wz9k66kbNzHpy1 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2024 02:18:06 -0300 (ADT) Received: from morales.pe (54.39.251.57) by DAG2EX2.mxpca1.local (172.16.2.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Wed, 4 Sep 2024 01:18:06 -0400 Authentication-Results: garm.ovh; auth=pass (GARM-95B002eb66bf9b-33f4-495c-aea8-ad5fec99999b, 0712BD25D783414753B61CFA8E7C13F386C427FF) smtp.auth=rodrigo@morales.pe X-OVh-ClientIp: 190.236.250.201 From: Rodrigo Morales To: Rodrigo Morales , Subject: Re: Obsolete documentation on insert-in-front-hooks (GNU Emacs 29.4) In-Reply-To: <87v7zc81i2.fsf@morales.pe> References: <87v7zc81i2.fsf@morales.pe> Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 00:18:05 -0500 Message-ID: <87r0a080aa.fsf@morales.pe> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [54.39.251.57] X-ClientProxiedBy: DAG1EX2.mxpca1.local (172.16.2.2) To DAG2EX2.mxpca1.local (172.16.2.12) X-Ovh-Tracer-GUID: 18c68039-6fad-4cea-a920-73b25ae2f7d6 X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 17117619236157910039 X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: 0 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrudehiedgledtucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuqfggjfdpvefjgfevmfevgfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecuhedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvffujghffffkgggtihesthdtredttddttdenucfhrhhomheptfhoughrihhgohcuofhorhgrlhgvshcuoehrohgurhhighhosehmohhrrghlvghsrdhpvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnheptdeivdefgedvuedttdduudeigfejvedvheefkeekfeejtedtgeeutdffgeegffetnecukfhppeduvdejrddtrddtrddupdehgedrfeelrddvhedurdehjedpudeltddrvdefiedrvdehtddrvddtudenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepihhnvghtpeduvdejrddtrddtrddupdhmrghilhhfrhhomheprhhoughrihhgohesmhhorhgrlhgvshdrphgvpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedupdhrtghpthhtohepsghughdqghhnuhdqvghmrggtshesghhnuhdrohhrghdpoffvtefjohhsthepmhhouddvpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuth Received-SPF: pass client-ip=51.161.45.254; envelope-from=rodrigo@morales.pe; helo=smtpout1.mo12.mail-out.ovh.ca X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 04 Sep 2024 03:24:36 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Rodrigo Morales writes: > I believe that the part "these functions receive two arguments, the > beginning and end of the inserted text." is obsolete because functions > in insert-in-front-hooks are passed 4 parameters. In the code block > below, you can see a correct function definition for > insert-in-front-hooks. The two code block shown below were retrieved > from the file ./lisp/progmodes/cpp.el When I wrote this bug report, I wasn't aware about the difference between text properties and overlay properties. I thought that all properties that can be used on text can also be used on overlays, now I know that I'm wrong. Please omit this bug report. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Sep 04 08:29:26 2024 Received: (at 73023-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Sep 2024 12:29:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33787 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1slp8Y-00088i-46 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2024 08:29:26 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:48904) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1slp8W-00088R-7W for 73023-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2024 08:29:24 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1slp7L-0006PS-Cb; Wed, 04 Sep 2024 08:28:11 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=ms1CEKMpi4waJwJSIu2vlVqQ+WgvLO1lRGP7njw6BD4=; b=Dr/mDdVR3MGI 0za3ENENMSoG2ZCdw7nJoT8iaZr2cCSfI0mwN+CSmh6KNS6Pdp2bTCAs9q6httt4NsxXXa0Sq2Tpp phxjx7UBbbnsGuNC2k6vEs9woLQoCN5x4WwcqtKu5VoB4j4WTKIQl9ZtF2C7gEaspgW5qLrHLZbXs izRDvGSX6buDnC4X+1Wqn0oyxE5kERsFsjisuXpHCz6NN8jz8gIXYIazEaWfPdhlP/1uC40hAjd0v 77eqQgg9/0WCXPHJLKnWVMGPGovxaBTDCSDObWidh4Wz48/rQp37i0+SGAIPPsv2r3VORNtC50hDL 9vZV2QWZoRN0VcrU+4nq5A==; Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2024 15:28:07 +0300 Message-Id: <86ikvb61t4.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Rodrigo Morales In-Reply-To: <87r0a080aa.fsf@morales.pe> (message from Rodrigo Morales on Wed, 4 Sep 2024 00:18:05 -0500) Subject: Re: bug#73023: Obsolete documentation on insert-in-front-hooks (GNU Emacs 29.4) References: <87v7zc81i2.fsf@morales.pe> <87r0a080aa.fsf@morales.pe> X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > From: Rodrigo Morales > Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 00:18:05 -0500 > > Rodrigo Morales writes: > > > I believe that the part "these functions receiv [...] Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [209.51.188.92 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [209.51.188.92 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 73023-done Cc: 73023-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) > From: Rodrigo Morales > Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 00:18:05 -0500 > > Rodrigo Morales writes: > > > I believe that the part "these functions receive two arguments, the > > beginning and end of the inserted text." is obsolete because functions > > in insert-in-front-hooks are passed 4 parameters. In the code block > > below, you can see a correct function definition for > > insert-in-front-hooks. The two code block shown below were retrieved > > from the file ./lisp/progmodes/cpp.el > > When I wrote this bug report, I wasn't aware about the difference > between text properties and overlay properties. I thought that all > properties that can be used on text can also be used on overlays, now I > know that I'm wrong. Please omit this bug report. Thanks, closing. From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:20:32 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2024 11:24:07 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator