GNU bug report logs - #72959
Request for merging "fonts-split-outputs" branch

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 72959 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 72959 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: 宋文武 <iyzsong <at> envs.net>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: Request for merging "fonts-split-outputs" branch
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2024 18:27:18 +0800

I think the branch is ready once it built on CI.

From https://issues.guix.gnu.org/70496:

Hello, here are some patches for font packages which updates
the install phase in font-build-system for multiple outputs, and
use that for some font packages.

When a font family is provided in different formats (eg: both ttf and
otf), font picker will list duplicated entries.  To remove those
duplicated entries, these patches will prefer "otf" over "ttf" files
by using '("out" "ttf")) as package's outputs field, so that otf files
will go into the default "out" output.

Message #8 received at 72959 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
To: 72959 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
Subject: Problem with data service?
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 11:13:05 +0200

Hello,

QA says:
   https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/fonts-split-outputs
   "Failed to process target revision"
and the logs show a build failure in guile-ssh.

Is there a way to try a new evaluation?

Andreas

Message #11 received at 72959 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
To: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
Cc: 72959 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Problem with data service?
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 10:21:25 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr> writes:

> Hello,
>
> QA says:
>    https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/fonts-split-outputs
>    "Failed to process target revision"
> and the logs show a build failure in guile-ssh.
>
> Is there a way to try a new evaluation?

It's possible to ask the data service to retry, although in this case
I'd maybe rebase the branch, as that will make sure it's up to date as
well as having the data service retry processing it.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #14 received at 72959 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
To: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
Cc: 72959 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Problem with data service?
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 11:50:18 +0200

Am Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 10:21:25AM +0100 schrieb Christopher Baines:
> It's possible to ask the data service to retry, although in this case
> I'd maybe rebase the branch, as that will make sure it's up to date as
> well as having the data service retry processing it.

Good point, although the branch was not very outdated, it had been
rebased on September 2.

I have just rebased, but cannot force push.
So instead I have deleted the remote branch and pushed a new one.
Hopefully this will work with the QA machinery.

Andreas

Message #17 received at 72959 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
To: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
Cc: 72959 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Problem with data service?
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 11:25:56 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr> writes:

> Am Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 10:21:25AM +0100 schrieb Christopher Baines:
>> It's possible to ask the data service to retry, although in this case
>> I'd maybe rebase the branch, as that will make sure it's up to date as
>> well as having the data service retry processing it.
>
> Good point, although the branch was not very outdated, it had been
> rebased on September 2.
>
> I have just rebased, but cannot force push.
> So instead I have deleted the remote branch and pushed a new one.
> Hopefully this will work with the QA machinery.

Yep, that's fine, that's the way that all rebases have to be done.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #20 received at 72959 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: 宋文武 <iyzsong <at> envs.net>
Cc: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>, Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>,
 72959 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#72959: Request for merging "fonts-split-outputs" branch
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2024 19:07:23 +0200

Hello!

Since ‘fonts-split-outputs’ is next in the merge queue at
<https://qa.guix.gnu.org/> and not fully built yet at bordeaux.guix,
I created this jobset:

  https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/fonts-split-outputs

Perhaps 宋文武 you could rebase the branch and trigger a new evaluation
with:

  wget --post-data="" -O/dev/null \
    https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/fonts-split-outputs/hook/evaluate

?

Ludo’.

Message #23 received at 72959 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: 宋文武 <iyzsong <at> envs.net>
Cc: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>, Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>,
 72959 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#72959: Request for merging "fonts-split-outputs" branch
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2024 14:32:56 +0200

Hello,

Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> skribis:

> Since ‘fonts-split-outputs’ is next in the merge queue at
> <https://qa.guix.gnu.org/> and not fully built yet at bordeaux.guix,
> I created this jobset:
>
>   https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/fonts-split-outputs
>
> Perhaps 宋文武 you could rebase the branch and trigger a new evaluation
> with:
>
>   wget --post-data="" -O/dev/null \
>     https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/fonts-split-outputs/hook/evaluate

I went ahead and rebased the branch on top of
ff88c8cf3e2b8e3e86f438dd42adfce2db8dc337 and triggered a new evaluation.

Ludo’.

Message #26 received at 72959 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>, 72959 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 宋文武 <iyzsong <at> envs.net>
Subject: Re: bug#72959: Request for merging "fonts-split-outputs" branch
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 18:52:34 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:

> Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> skribis:
>
>> Since ‘fonts-split-outputs’ is next in the merge queue at
>> <https://qa.guix.gnu.org/> and not fully built yet at bordeaux.guix,
>> I created this jobset:
>>
>>   https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/fonts-split-outputs
>>
>> Perhaps 宋文武 you could rebase the branch and trigger a new evaluation
>> with:
>>
>>   wget --post-data="" -O/dev/null \
>>     https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/fonts-split-outputs/hook/evaluate
>
> I went ahead and rebased the branch on top of
> ff88c8cf3e2b8e3e86f438dd42adfce2db8dc337 and triggered a new evaluation.

Things have been building but QA hasn't quite submitted all the new
builds post rebase yet. This might be complicated by the lack of
issues.guix.gnu.org, once it's back though things will hopefully not
take too much longer to finish building.

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #29 received at 72959 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
To: 宋文武 <iyzsong <at> envs.net>
Cc: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>,
 Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>, 72959 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#72959: Request for merging "fonts-split-outputs" branch
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 11:51:59 +0100

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net> writes:

> Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> skribis:
>>
>>> Since ‘fonts-split-outputs’ is next in the merge queue at
>>> <https://qa.guix.gnu.org/> and not fully built yet at bordeaux.guix,
>>> I created this jobset:
>>>
>>>   https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/fonts-split-outputs
>>>
>>> Perhaps 宋文武 you could rebase the branch and trigger a new evaluation
>>> with:
>>>
>>>   wget --post-data="" -O/dev/null \
>>>     https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/fonts-split-outputs/hook/evaluate
>>
>> I went ahead and rebased the branch on top of
>> ff88c8cf3e2b8e3e86f438dd42adfce2db8dc337 and triggered a new evaluation.
>
> Things have been building but QA hasn't quite submitted all the new
> builds post rebase yet. This might be complicated by the lack of
> issues.guix.gnu.org, once it's back though things will hopefully not
> take too much longer to finish building.

The builds have been progressing. Substitute availability isn't quite as
high as master yet, and there are probably some flaky builds that'll
require more attempts to get substitutes, but it looks like this can be
merged this week.

I had a look at why x86_64-linux on ci.guix.gnu.org is a bit behind, and
some builds seem to be in the failed dependency state, but with no
failed dependency listed. Clicking the restart button does prompt that
thing to be built, but doesn't seem to unblock the builds on mass.

宋文武, are you available to push this once it's ready?

Thanks,

Chris

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #32 received at 72959 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
Cc: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>, 72959 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 宋文武 <iyzsong <at> envs.net>
Subject: Re: bug#72959: Request for merging "fonts-split-outputs" branch
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 13:48:45 +0200

Hi Christopher,

Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net> skribis:

> Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> skribis:
>>
>>> Since ‘fonts-split-outputs’ is next in the merge queue at
>>> <https://qa.guix.gnu.org/> and not fully built yet at bordeaux.guix,
>>> I created this jobset:
>>>
>>>   https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/fonts-split-outputs
>>>
>>> Perhaps 宋文武 you could rebase the branch and trigger a new evaluation
>>> with:
>>>
>>>   wget --post-data="" -O/dev/null \
>>>     https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/fonts-split-outputs/hook/evaluate
>>
>> I went ahead and rebased the branch on top of
>> ff88c8cf3e2b8e3e86f438dd42adfce2db8dc337 and triggered a new evaluation.
>
> Things have been building but QA hasn't quite submitted all the new
> builds post rebase yet. This might be complicated by the lack of
> issues.guix.gnu.org, once it's back though things will hopefully not
> take too much longer to finish building.

Yeah.  FWIW we’re at 64% successfully built at
<https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/fonts-split-outputs>.

It’ll still be some time before AArch64 builds even start (20% still
queued), though perhaps we shouldn’t wait for it.

Ludo’.

Message #35 received at 72959 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
Cc: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>, 72959 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 宋文武 <iyzsong <at> envs.net>
Subject: Re: bug#72959: Request for merging "fonts-split-outputs" branch
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 17:40:01 +0200

Hello,

Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net> skribis:

> The builds have been progressing. Substitute availability isn't quite as
> high as master yet, and there are probably some flaky builds that'll
> require more attempts to get substitutes, but it looks like this can be
> merged this week.

Yay, good.

> I had a look at why x86_64-linux on ci.guix.gnu.org is a bit behind, and
> some builds seem to be in the failed dependency state, but with no
> failed dependency listed. Clicking the restart button does prompt that
> thing to be built, but doesn't seem to unblock the builds on mass.

Right, I broke that with recent changes to Cuirass (I even wrote tests
that happen to not test the right thing…).

> 宋文武, are you available to push this once it's ready?

If not, we can probably do it on their behalf, in an effort to move
forward.

Thanks,
Ludo’.

Message #40 received at 72959-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
To: 73288 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Advance in queue
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 16:43:49 +0200

Hello,

I have just pushed the fonts-split-outputs branch, which had been built
on QA, after rebasing it on master.

Now I have rebased mesa-updates on the (new) master branch and pushed it;
normally it should be picked up and built automatically by QA.

Thanks to you all for your patience!

Andreas

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.