GNU bug report logs - #72925
Adding JPM package for Janet

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Omar Bassam <omar.bassam88 <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2024 09:06:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: "Suhail Singh" <suhailsingh247 <at> gmail.com>
To: Omar Bassam <omar.bassam88 <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Sharlatan Hellseher <sharlatanus <at> gmail.com>, 72925 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Munyoki Kilyungi <me <at> bonfacemunyoki.com>, Katherine Cox-Buday <cox.katherine.e+guix <at> gmail.com>, Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>, jgart <jgart <at> dismail.de>
Subject: [bug#72925] Adding JPM package for Janet
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 09:18:42 -0400
Hi Omar,

Thank you for submitting this patch.  A few comments:

Omar Bassam <omar.bassam88 <at> gmail.com> writes:

> Change-Id: I730ef2f5c874c5142a580a42af76180e95d93ccd
> ---
>  gnu/packages/lisp.scm | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
> index 5d4399f145..96698d375d 100644

Could you please update the reroll-count when you send amendments to the
patch?  IIUC, this version should have been v2.

> +(define-public jpm
> +  (package
> +    (name "jpm")
> +    (version "1.1.0")
> +    (source (origin
> +              (method git-fetch)
> +              (uri (git-reference
> +                    (url "https://github.com/janet-lang/jpm.git")
> +                    (commit (string-append "v" version))))
> +              (file-name (git-file-name name version))
> +              (sha256 (base32 "05rdxigmiy7vf93s16a8n2029lq33073jccz1rjl4iisxj6piw4l"))))
> +    (build-system trivial-build-system)
> ...
> +                    (substitute* (string-append %output "/bin/jpm")
> +                      (("/usr/bin/env janet")
> +                       (string-append #$janet "/bin/janet")))

Is my understanding correct that you're updating the shebang line here?
If so, would it be better to use the copy-build-system instead?  If not,
could you please elaborate?  If copy-build-system does indeed turn out
to be better suited, could you please send v3 of the patch?

-- 
Suhail




This bug report was last modified 137 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.