GNU bug report logs - #72915
Docstrings of add-hook and remove-hook improvement?

Previous Next

Full log

Message #52 received at 72915 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Tomas Nordin <tomasn <at> posteo.net>
To: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>, Stefan Monnier
 <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, 72915 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#72915: Docstrings of add-hook and remove-hook improvement?
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 21:57:10 +0000

Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com> writes:

> Tomas Nordin <tomasn <at> posteo.net> writes:
>
>> Tomas Nordin <tomasn <at> posteo.net> writes:
>>
>>> Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>>>
>>>> The `add-hook` part was OK for me, indeed.
>>>>
>>>> [ I'm no great fan of that paragraph (neither the original nor the one
>>>>   you replace it with), tho, because it's a bit "too detailed" for my
>>>>   taste.  E.g. the value *always* ends up being a list of functions, and
>>>>   the parenthesis states something which sounds to me like it should be
>>>>   inferrable from the rest of the docstring.  ]
>>>
>>> I think I agree, the parenthesized part could be discarded, shortening
>>> the paragraph to
>>>
>>> "HOOK should be a symbol.  If HOOK is void, or if HOOK's value is a
>>> single function, it is changed to a list of functions."
>>
>> I think nothing was installed along this discussion so far. Attached is
>> an attempt to summarize the suggestions as patch.
>
> Thanks.  I think this contribution is bigger than what we can accept
> without a copyright assignment from you to the FSF.
>
> Please see etc/copyright-assign.txt in emacs.git to get started.

Actually I got my assignment confirmed in November last year. It took
some time, but it should be there on file somewhere. Should I provide
the assignment number?

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.