From unknown Mon Jun 23 07:46:58 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#72872 <72872@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#72872 <72872@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: Learning Debbugs - documentation unclear - test Reply-To: bug#72872 <72872@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 14:46:58 +0000 retitle 72872 Learning Debbugs - documentation unclear - test reassign 72872 guix submitter 72872 Marek Pa=C5=9Bnikowski severity 72872 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 29 09:25:34 2024 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Aug 2024 13:25:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50742 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sjf9X-0007gg-TR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Aug 2024 09:25:34 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:52382) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sjecQ-0006UN-L1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Aug 2024 08:51:20 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sjebW-00009P-VG for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Aug 2024 08:50:22 -0400 Received: from [81.190.248.246] (helo=marekpasnikowski.pl) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sjebU-0003Of-Gw for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Aug 2024 08:50:22 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.local [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 54a26310 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2024 12:43:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=marekpasnikowski.pl; h= from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= dkim; bh=ruW4UFXxVsMKbdPMnmxDaTv+16pA7U93ISteQk0ZEwg=; b=AjbE880 pgMp0malOx7I2xthEhhnecSsfFEuGTPUmIQ355gkplBQNiKsKYqbJS7dv2tpXgR6 HTHPkWVI59Mq7oS4UkwL4kqMISYu+ZpfZlY6ksCGwGlI55UJmOw4+fudC39Qiwc6 bBq3osfoT2mtNIOxhxEfgPEKtdVFedGp8n++pob2lz4MawD3x9T5TOhg0qMkZldy aXzWXcYF1Sm2/O/IV1isR9ypFkWshudkTKbybxNbG63pwLA+Jh2yPf+oG7qg6Vpq XRA5Lh5sc3zK4v8ghvOLw2OhHm9Qu3gcqJmQFm6GRMAMvNejAdRSSSAXBmQt9VIN Tpe2bsumlZ+nslw== Received: by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 7f8f7ac1 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2024 12:43:36 +0000 (UTC) From: =?utf-8?Q?Marek_Pa=C5=9Bnikowski?= To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Learning Debbugs - documentation unclear - test Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 14:43:35 +0200 Message-ID: <8734mnv6rs.fsf@marekpasnikowski.pl> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 81.190.248.246 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=81.190.248.246; envelope-from=marek@marekpasnikowski.pl; helo=marekpasnikowski.pl X-Spam_score_int: 15 X-Spam_score: 1.5 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam_report: (1.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, PYZOR_CHECK=1.392, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SCC_BODY_SINGLE_WORD=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 09:25:30 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) help From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 29 11:21:14 2024 Received: (at 72872) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Aug 2024 15:21:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51904 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sjgxV-0002uV-A7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Aug 2024 11:21:14 -0400 Received: from [81.190.248.246] (port=38624 helo=marekpasnikowski.pl) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sjgCl-0001TS-GV for 72872@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Aug 2024 10:32:57 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.local [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id cd6ed9a8 for <72872@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 29 Aug 2024 14:31:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=marekpasnikowski.pl; h= from:to:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=dkim; bh=hS9qCwMOllGOAqFga3LE4fO9r LqHjv1ZhTILrG49PBo=; b=kcvASLjeXawiEqwYvOKVCiNYbxCaKLmf+dxNaD1nN kNGqVuJ8olZQcAHus5miG2i8WHylQMa4W6vOHrJrP9vutwSxhdamd9tziC9hAJ/C gX8lzWFLm4NAVDmp5DSmPW8LY0W9sHdXU6uTnD3yt7xXMpo48/fMp98j8uJkhSLa yg9Qs9ASMaOYoMiPI/ptG9DhDaSHVRS0S+lTQbnMC7FdayQKdUjIrsi2etIiN53V BvZs2U5QykSeZgxZ8w3up/J7ZQi5bMgl09HHTrso5t9wMqYACULbKjJgIoNJk++s NDFQf7La3xQy9QtRql7FdeBEv68v8q+ouy+zi0ARv4prg== Received: by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 79424d38 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO) for <72872@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 29 Aug 2024 14:31:54 +0000 (UTC) From: =?utf-8?Q?Marek_Pa=C5=9Bnikowski?= To: 72872@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 16:31:53 +0200 Message-ID: <87h6b3h02u.fsf@marekpasnikowski.pl> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 4.9 (++++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: This is embarassing. I apologize for this “report”. I was following Debbugs’ [documentation][1] to finally get started with learning the system. Unfortunately, the worst case scenario played out and I got exposed in [...] Content analysis details: (4.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 1.7 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist [URIs: marekpasnikowski.pl] 1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 72872 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 11:21:12 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 3.9 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: This is embarassing. I apologize for this “report”. I was following Debbugs’ [documentation][1] to finally get started with learning the system. Unfortunately, the worst case scenario played out and I got exposed in [...] Content analysis details: (3.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.7 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist [URIs: marekpasnikowski.pl] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager This is embarassing. I apologize for this =E2=80=9Creport=E2=80=9D. I was following Debbugs=E2= =80=99 [documentation][1] to finally get started with learning the system. Unfortunately, the worst case scenario played out and I got exposed in the act. At this point, I have no idea how to peacefully start interacting with Debbugs in read-only capacity. [1]: https://debbugs.gnu.org/server-refcard.html From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Aug 29 13:38:06 2024 Received: (at 72872-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Aug 2024 17:38:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52099 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sjj5y-0007ED-CT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Aug 2024 13:38:06 -0400 Received: from mx1.dismail.de ([78.46.223.134]:32457) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sjj5t-0007Dc-VF for 72872-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Aug 2024 13:38:04 -0400 Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 7a552ab9; Thu, 29 Aug 2024 19:36:57 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=20190914; bh=N37kJ/Dqp2lw9X8TwXYyXxswdR/6ep4bK/Xvavuu2/Q=; b= SOFbTnSjJHyKP91UEqu65bAKPpgPJWUST4Fdc3yK3/j8WVNp2eG99PVEvW+ak4nH flXkS8+l4QOW7SIB2WTZ98qDgf4c/XADehrNqiGoX8geMzwZapsJB7yBFBpkMK8k lbGiEo3w5iITC4RNmCo8RT1HNKP5gmOyu0OVWTuzXoSTREI0/GCwjZp0ygYUvPwl ABQrZJuUXN60zZrRmvTwsiXZOz3mDdwbBZjkkMDYTHZICooTs+p5geLQzHj3WuoE HZImTdlH/aWF2faHDCeW675gsifVHN+P1nbAI571wSu9IFa020+4aKKvEkwSnt3P iVxxPvFGK4RfBGiNIjd4kg== Received: from smtp2.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.12]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 78457365; Thu, 29 Aug 2024 19:36:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id fcf0eaed; Thu, 29 Aug 2024 19:36:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 3e890d57 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Thu, 29 Aug 2024 19:36:55 +0200 (CEST) From: jgart To: 72872-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: Learning Debbugs - documentation unclear - test In-Reply-To: <87h6b3h02u.fsf@marekpasnikowski.pl> Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 12:36:52 -0500 Message-ID: <874j73cjt7.fsf@dismail.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 72872-done Cc: Marek =?utf-8?Q?Pa=C5=9Bnikowski?= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) > This is embarassing. Sorry to hear that. > > At this point, I have no idea how to peacefully start interacting with > Debbugs in read-only capacity. I recommend to use mumi instead of debbugs. Debbugs is confusing. See these slides here for more info: https://git.sr.ht/~whereiseveryone/mumiii -- all the best, jgart From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Sep 10 04:36:16 2024 Received: (at 72872-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Sep 2024 08:36:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34823 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1snwMB-0005e9-QV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 04:36:16 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f41.google.com ([209.85.128.41]:56516) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1snwM8-0005dU-Bq for 72872-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 04:36:13 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f41.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-42cb60aff1eso19896355e9.0 for <72872-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 01:36:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1725957302; x=1726562102; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=96SQ0QIhlxtpM4m+AlCdxBbvsCLDWaTCrn0N9B+FOSA=; b=mhROireCLkBgpiXYhG64djDLERPR63B08gVqAcA3m4uI8mg70aJW8POVX317Buw+sv /Avz4HW4+pcprixBPVi4G6uFA9AyoUTesgI4G3a3/ks7dLEGIYnZX7zG/dKlaE0dWNLQ UG8aPoM7117BPSNt4asXB4EYxRYHsoatfxn/8Qe+tSjXnGK6XD2jSCLuYW65Ttvjd4vB XS6BJ8saJSmAVosvtygs2Xvg32tY+vim3V8qaS2ngHPBQ/6pRteRhYZ8k+GXuyp4CqK0 GTXBYxaueZtkq+Sy73tNLyJUYNUVktB64LjCt+TTNvl50bWryJvRHuTIiu3mKUF7akw5 g7Gg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1725957302; x=1726562102; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=96SQ0QIhlxtpM4m+AlCdxBbvsCLDWaTCrn0N9B+FOSA=; b=SCp/o0qak1uc+4Nv4CUAeYWBN1ATW1npW9R1+I5ceiz1p8WJlB/hNbc8MgB0tW3XpY O7l9gRM3MPp6TVAHRwGCHyPWl8lsaqau5N7dVEwIqaX7pTMcsH5XB4hF3cCR8DfeHrcA KvP0IWVGk2UJFEozQ+IOPH9Y8Ghz+RGqKXAE2KB2Ap/gNeeCl/reSBziHiYj8xyZqGzb fRj2vTL9HM8zudyImdEkBf38W5clskMSJSPuPVjBIJjuWoHXAnlTdyakirwdUl/EC6Hr 1xEqTHGyVZYIgKPMkX/40uT3u3JbsVhfPCc5MO1W4egLpjiAdLqeOAbsqoq2ySY8NASd 3lgQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCW0MxqzlS4aehkYrjeMPObgPf6KEL4o4ODMjO/k1+gD5LsZgCpMs5zYQ3TQ+i4caheJuF7IVbO1zsGn@debbugs.gnu.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy10sCfbWrwmdnOIiW9Zfd39dYk4UxOw5uT0HRjpZEq9n4AOrsH bXo7TKZ60TZ0+5iqUq6Iirj5uQ96/oURBornosYEqMzMLkuh5neZ X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG23oIQAmvF2IkxQmAe5m2Nw5/DBG7pwo/62G7+bXvpxsQxa8D3eip5VPdmd0F6nkKQdHneeA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4f82:b0:42c:b9c8:2bb0 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-42cb9c82edfmr36713715e9.4.1725957301921; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 01:35:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:5ac1:7013:f8b9:fc1a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-42cb0642f99sm100442475e9.40.2024.09.10.01.34.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 10 Sep 2024 01:35:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Simon Tournier To: jgart , 72872-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#72872: Learning Debbugs - documentation unclear - test In-Reply-To: <874j73cjt7.fsf@dismail.de> References: <8734mnv6rs.fsf@marekpasnikowski.pl> <874j73cjt7.fsf@dismail.de> Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2024 21:40:03 +0200 Message-ID: <87o74wr4z0.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 72872-done Cc: Marek =?utf-8?Q?Pa=C5=9Bnikowski?= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) Hi jgart, On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 at 12:36, jgart via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > I recommend to use mumi instead of debbugs. Debbugs is confusing. You cannot avoid Debbugs. ;-) Debbugs is the name of the issue tracker system [1]. And Mumi is one front-end. Other front-ends are: plain emails, debbugs.el, issues.guix.gnu.org, or BTS (debian-devscripts-bts), etc. Mumi rocks! BTW. Cheers, simon 1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debbugs From unknown Mon Jun 23 07:46:58 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2024 11:24:16 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator