GNU bug report logs - #72867
[PATCH] gexp: Make 'local-file' follow symlinks.

Previous Next

Full log

Message #17 received at 72867 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Nigko Yerden <nigko.yerden <at> gmail.com>
To: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian <at> pelzflorian.de>
Cc: 72867 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#72867] [PATCH] gexp: Make 'local-file' follow symlinks.
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 17:07:03 +0500

Hello Florian,

> I contributed only the error location in a failed fix.
Discussions and testings also should be counted. Without your
suggestions I would hardly have made this patch.
Thank you for all this.

> There are currently no tests for `current-source-directory'.
> To make a test case like in test/channels.scm, we would have to make
> a new guile process or build process, I presume?
I was thinking about making a test to 'local-file'. It is natural
taking into account the problem this patch solves sits in
'local-file' bad behavior. But 'current-source-directory'
is fine already.

Regards,
Nigko



pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:
> Hello all.  Thank you to Nigko for sending the patch.
> 
> Nigko Yerden <nigko.yerden <at> gmail.com> writes:
>> This patch is the result of collective work of
>> Florian Pelz <pelzflorian <at> pelzflorian.de> and
>> Nigko Yerden <nigko.yerden <at> gmail.com>
> 
> All real contribution to this patch is Nigko’s work.
> I contributed only the error location in a failed fix.
> 
> 
> Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:
>> I haven’t read the thread above.  Could you come up with a test case
>> that shows the problem being fixed?  (That is, the test should fail when
>> run on current ‘master’.)
> 
> Nigko sums up the fixed issue in
> <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2024-08/msg00071.html>:
>> pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) wrote:
>>> Nonsense; it must have worked; 7.7 Wrapping Up lists
>>> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guile.git/tree/.guix/modules/guile-package.scm?id=cd57379b3df636198d8cd8e76c1bfbc523762e79
>>> as proof.
>> […]
>> For me pulling from this channel with subsequent
>>
>> $ guix build guile <at> 3.0.99-git
>>
>> throws an error ("No such file or directory" "GUILE-VERSION"). However,
>>
>> $ GUILE_LOAD_PATH= guix build guile <at> 3.0.99-git
>>
>> , which emulates system without [1] in Guile load path, works like a charm.
>> Thus, this repository behaves exactly as does the main branch of [2].
>>
>> Perhaps many systems (e.g. Guix on foreign distributions) indeed does not
>> have [1] in Guile load path, and thus recipe from the Cookbook works for them.
>>     Regards,
>> Nigko
>>
>> [1] ~/.config/guix/current/share/guile/site/3.0/
>> [2] https://gitlab.com/anigko/test-channel.git
> 
> There are currently no tests for `current-source-directory'.
> To make a test case like in test/channels.scm, we would have to make
> a new guile process or build process, I presume?
> 
> Regards,
> Florian

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.