GNU bug report logs - #72794
Bad kernel config

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Jorge Acereda <jacereda <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 17:34:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 72794 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 72794 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox

Report forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#72794; Package guix. (Sat, 24 Aug 2024 17:34:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent to Jorge Acereda <jacereda <at> gmail.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix <at> gnu.org. (Sat, 24 Aug 2024 17:34:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jorge Acereda <jacereda <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Bad kernel config
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 19:44:55 +0200

Hi,

I noticed this looking at the linux.scm file:

    ,@(if (version>=? version "5.13")
          '(("BPF_UNPRIV_DEFAULT_OFF" . #t))
          '())


Shouldn't that be "CONFIG_BPF_UNPRIV_DEFAULT_OFF" instead?

Regards,
  Jorge Acereda
Reply sent to Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>:
You have taken responsibility. (Sat, 14 Sep 2024 14:14:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Notification sent to Jorge Acereda <jacereda <at> gmail.com>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Sat, 14 Sep 2024 14:14:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #10 received at 72794-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Jorge Acereda <jacereda <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 72794-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#72794: Bad kernel config
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 23:12:31 +0900

Hi,

Jorge Acereda <jacereda <at> gmail.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> I noticed this looking at the linux.scm file:
>
>     ,@(if (version>=? version "5.13")
>           '(("BPF_UNPRIV_DEFAULT_OFF" . #t))
>           '())
>
>
> Shouldn't that be "CONFIG_BPF_UNPRIV_DEFAULT_OFF" instead?

Indeed! Thanks for spotting that. It's now fixed, with commit
74c96e87a5.

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim
bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Sun, 13 Oct 2024 11:24:12 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 307 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.