GNU bug report logs - #72787
31.0.50; Invalid describe-function completion candidates

Previous Next

Full log

Message #49 received at 72787 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org>, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca
Cc: michael_heerdegen <at> web.de, pipcet <at> protonmail.com, me <at> eshelyaron.com,
 72787 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#72787: 31.0.50; Invalid describe-function completion
 candidates
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 09:34:12 +0300

> From: Arash Esbati <arash <at> gnu.org>
> Cc: Eshel Yaron <me <at> eshelyaron.com>,  michael_heerdegen <at> web.de,
>   pipcet <at> protonmail.com,  72787 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,  monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca
> Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 06:56:58 +0200
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> From: Eshel Yaron <me <at> eshelyaron.com>
> >> Cc: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>,  michael_heerdegen <at> web.de,
> >>   72787-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org,  pipcet <at> protonmail.com
> >> Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2024 19:41:47 +0200
> >> 
> >> Thanks, but the issue remains, so shouldn't the bug remain open as well?
> >
> > I reopened it.
> 
> Is it possible to revert this change on master as well until a new
> working patch is available?  IIUC, Stefan noted upthread:
> 
>   I think this report makes it clear that
>   45ae4de0e7ce99c88c62f940f605bca693b8e33f should not have gone to
>   `emacs-30` but to `master`.  AFAIK it did not fix a regression or even
>   a user-visible bug.
> 
> The current behavior is somewhat annoying.

AFAIU, Stefan later explained that this is a feature, but maybe I
misunderstood him.  See

  https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=73473#16

Stefan?

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.