GNU bug report logs - #72766
[PATCH 0/2] slurm: Enable REST API.

Previous Next

Full log

Message #35 received at 72766 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludovic.courtes <at> inria.fr>
To: Arun Isaac <arunisaac <at> systemreboot.net>
Cc: 72766 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#72766] [PATCH v2 2/2] gnu: slurm: Enable REST API.
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 08:50:36 +0200

Hello Arun!

Arun Isaac <arunisaac <at> systemreboot.net> skribis:

> * gnu/packages/parallel.scm (slurm)[inputs]: Add dbus, http-parser, libjwt,
> librdkafka, libtaml and (mariadb "dev").
> [arguments]: Add --enable-slurmrestd, --with-bpf, --with-http-parser,
> --with-rdkafka and --with-yaml to configure flags.
>
> Change-Id: Icddaa8f883754129d975e82fccd732a47a467517

[...]

> +    (inputs (list dbus
> +                  freeipmi
> +                  http-parser
>                    `(,hwloc-2 "lib")
>                    json-c
> +                  libjwt
> +                  librdkafka
> +                  libyaml
>                    linux-pam
> +                  `(,mariadb "dev")

Could you check how this impacts ‘guix size slurm’?

The reason I’m asking is that we at work often end up with slurm in
packs that we carry to supercomputers, so it would be best if it wasn’t
too big:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ guix size slurm |tail -1
total: 359.8 MiB
$ guix size slurm mariadb |tail -1
total: 663.4 MiB
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

I wonder if we should have a ‘slurm-minimal’ variant or something?

(That could probably come as a patch after this series.)

Apart from that, both patches look good to me!

Thanks,
Ludo’.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.