GNU bug report logs -
#72745
`bash-mode` doesn't recognize comments inside command substitution
Previous Next
To reply to this bug, email your comments to 72745 AT debbugs.gnu.org.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#72745
; Package
emacs
.
(Wed, 21 Aug 2024 13:09:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
"shynur ." <one.last.kiss <at> outlook.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Wed, 21 Aug 2024 13:09:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Reproduce:
1. echo -e 'echo $(echo 42 # print 42)\n)' > /tmp/a.bash
Content of `/tmp/a.bash`:
echo $(echo 42 # print 42)
)
2. emacs -Q, version 29.4
3. eval: (set-face-italic font-lock-comment-face t)
4. Open file `/tmp/a.bash`.
Only the first `)` is italic; "# print 42" is not.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#72745
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 24 Aug 2024 09:21:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 72745 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: "shynur ." <one.last.kiss <at> outlook.com>
> Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 13:02:24 +0000
>
> Reproduce:
> 1. echo -e 'echo $(echo 42 # print 42)\n)' > /tmp/a.bash
> Content of `/tmp/a.bash`:
> echo $(echo 42 # print 42)
> )
> 2. emacs -Q, version 29.4
> 3. eval: (set-face-italic font-lock-comment-face t)
> 4. Open file `/tmp/a.bash`.
>
> Only the first `)` is italic; "# print 42" is not.
I'm not sure this is not the right behavior.
Does anyone else have an opinion here?
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#72745
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 24 Aug 2024 15:14:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 72745 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
>> Reproduce:
>> 1. echo -e 'echo $(echo 42 # print 42)\n)' > /tmp/a.bash
>> Content of `/tmp/a.bash`:
>> echo $(echo 42 # print 42)
>> )
>> 2. emacs -Q, version 29.4
>> 3. eval: (set-face-italic font-lock-comment-face t)
>> 4. Open file `/tmp/a.bash`.
>>
>> Only the first `)` is italic; "# print 42" is not.
>
> I'm not sure this is not the right behavior.
> Does anyone else have an opinion here?
Too many "not"s in one sentence, and too many nested "echo"s in
the other.
But when I try to run
#!/bin/bash
echo $(echo 42 # print 42)
)
echo there
it returns
42
there
as expected. IOW, I agree with the title of this bug report (and in my
test, Emacs doesn't highlighted any part of that script with the comment face).
Stefan
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#72745
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 24 Aug 2024 15:32:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 72745 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: "shynur ." <one.last.kiss <at> outlook.com>, 72745 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 11:12:06 -0400
>
> >> Reproduce:
> >> 1. echo -e 'echo $(echo 42 # print 42)\n)' > /tmp/a.bash
> >> Content of `/tmp/a.bash`:
> >> echo $(echo 42 # print 42)
> >> )
> >> 2. emacs -Q, version 29.4
> >> 3. eval: (set-face-italic font-lock-comment-face t)
> >> 4. Open file `/tmp/a.bash`.
> >>
> >> Only the first `)` is italic; "# print 42" is not.
> >
> > I'm not sure this is not the right behavior.
> > Does anyone else have an opinion here?
>
> Too many "not"s in one sentence, and too many nested "echo"s in
> the other.
>
> But when I try to run
>
> #!/bin/bash
> echo $(echo 42 # print 42)
> )
> echo there
>
> it returns
>
> 42
> there
>
> as expected. IOW, I agree with the title of this bug report (and in my
> test, Emacs doesn't highlighted any part of that script with the comment face).
FWIW, I tried bash-ts-mode, and it doesn't show the comment face
there, either.
This bug report was last modified 294 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.