GNU bug report logs - #72695
CC Mode 5.35.2 (C++//l); c++-mode misindents 'if constexpr' inside lambdas

Previous Next

Package: cc-mode;

Reported by: Arsen Arsenović <arsen <at> aarsen.me>

Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2024 09:52:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Alan Mackenzie <acm <at> muc.de>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Alan Mackenzie <acm <at> muc.de>
To: Arsen Arsenović <arsen <at> aarsen.me>
Cc: acm <at> muc.de, 72695 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#72695: CC Mode 5.35.2 (C++//l); c++-mode misindents 'if constexpr' inside lambdas
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 14:59:01 +0000
Hello, Arsen.

On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 01:02:50 +0200, Arsen Arsenović wrote:
> Hi Alan,

> Alan Mackenzie <acm <at> muc.de> writes:

[ .... ]

I'm hoping I've now fixed this bug (see patch below).

[ .... ]

> >> I've tried it on a few examples I came up with, it seems to work well in
> >> 'real-life' code.

> >> I've also constructed the following "stress test" which includes (almost
> >> - see below) all the productions that can exist in a lambda function, in
> >> the same context as the original bad example:

> > Thanks, this was very useful.  As an important question, can and alignas
> > specifier exist inside a lambda expression?  If so, what does it mean?
> > My new patch below doesn't (yet) handle it.

> It certainly can in the body.  I presume you mean in the
> leader/declarator/whathaveyou however; in that case, yes, as part of the
> attribute-specifier-seq in lambda-expression and lambda-declarator, and
> its meaning depends on the position (see
> https://eel.is/c++draft/expr.prim.lambda#closure-6).

Thanks, I've now found the place in the C++ syntax where alignas can go
in a lambda construct.  It is the only specifier which may go in these
places, although any number of attributes are allowed.  (As a matter of
interest, attributes in CC Mode are treated as syntactic whitespace.)

[ .... ]

> >>   void
> >>   def ()
> >>   {
> >>     auto foo = [&,
> >>   	      a,
> >>   	      b = 123,
> >>   	      c,
> >>   	      ...d,
> >>   	      ...e = 123
> >>   	      ]
> >>       <typename T,
> >>        typename S>
> >>       //alignas (128)
> >>       [[gnu::noreturn]]
> >>       requires some_concept<T>
> >>       (int a,
> >>        int b,
> >>        int c)
> >>       consteval
> >>       constexpr
> >>       mutable
> >>       static
> >>       //noexcept(true)
> >>       [[gnu::packed]]
> >>       //alignas (128)
> >>       //->
> >>       //int
> >>       //requires (std::same_as <decltype (a), int>)
> >>         {
> >>       if constexpr (true)
> >>         ;
> >>     }
> >>   }

Question: Is that first (commented out) alignas correct where it is?  My
reading of the version of the standard suggests that the alignas (128)
should come _after_ the requires some_concept<T>, not before it.

> > Here's a modified version which is now fully handled (as far as it goes):

And here's a further modified version, which my patch (below) now
handles:

void
def ()
{
      auto foo = [&,
              a,
              b = 123,
              c,
              ...d,
              ...e = 123
      ]
        <typename T,
         typename S>
//alignas (128)
        [[gnu::noreturn]]
        requires some_concept<T>
        alignas (128)
        (int a,
         int b,
         int c)
        consteval
        constexpr
        mutable
        static
        noexcept(true)
        [[gnu::packed]]
        alignas (128)
        -> int
        requires (std::same_as <decltype (a), int>)
      {
        if constexpr (true)
          ;
      }
}

[ .... ]

> >> Hopefully these examples help.

> > Very much so.

> >> Please also note that in a few places (such as alignas, the noexcept
> >> specifier, RHS of assignments in the capture list) near-arbitrary
> >> expressions can appear, and that requires clause have special boolean
> >> expression syntax (see
> >> https://eel.is/c++draft/temp.pre#nt:requires-clause).

> > I'm afraid I haven't looked at this, yet.

I have now.  :-)

[ .... ]

> > Here's an up to date version of the patch, which should work better than
> > the last version.  Please do the usual with it, and let me know how it
> > goes.  Thanks!

And here's what I'm hoping will be the final version of the patch to fix
this bug.  Again, could you try it out (on real code as well as test
code), and let me know how well it works.  It should apply cleanly to the
Emacs master branch.  Thanks!

Even it the patch is good, I'm not quite ready to commit it yet, since I
need to amend the test suite somewhat.


diff -r 48ad661a2d7d cc-align.el
--- a/cc-align.el	Mon Jul 22 12:09:34 2024 +0000
+++ b/cc-align.el	Fri Sep 20 14:15:17 2024 +0000
@@ -95,7 +95,9 @@
       (c-backward-syntactic-ws (c-langelem-pos langelem))
       (if (and (memq (char-before) '(?} ?,))
 	       (not (and c-overloadable-operators-regexp
-			 (c-after-special-operator-id))))
+			 (c-after-special-operator-id)))
+	       (progn (goto-char (c-langelem-pos langelem))
+		      (not (looking-at c-requires-clause-key))))
 	  c-basic-offset))))
 
 (defun c-lineup-gnu-DEFUN-intro-cont (langelem)
diff -r 48ad661a2d7d cc-engine.el
--- a/cc-engine.el	Mon Jul 22 12:09:34 2024 +0000
+++ b/cc-engine.el	Fri Sep 20 14:15:17 2024 +0000
@@ -8694,10 +8694,9 @@
 	(c-forward-syntactic-ws)
 	(c-forward-id-comma-list ref t t))
 
-       ((and (c-keyword-member kwd-sym 'c-paren-any-kwds)
+       ((and (c-keyword-member kwd-sym 'c-paren-type-kwds)
 	     (eq (char-after) ?\())
 	;; There's an open paren after a keyword in `c-paren-any-kwds'.
-
 	(forward-char)
 	(when (and (setq pos (c-up-list-forward))
 		   (eq (char-before pos) ?\)))
@@ -8715,6 +8714,12 @@
 	  (setq safe-pos (point)))
 	  (c-forward-syntactic-ws))
 
+       ((c-keyword-member kwd-sym 'c-paren-nontype-kwds)
+	(when (and (eq (char-after) ?\()
+		   (c-go-list-forward))
+	  (setq safe-pos (point))
+	  (c-forward-syntactic-ws)))
+
        ((and (c-keyword-member kwd-sym 'c-<>-sexp-kwds)
 	     (eq (char-after) ?<)
 	     (c-forward-<>-arglist (c-keyword-member kwd-sym 'c-<>-type-kwds)))
@@ -9914,9 +9919,6 @@
   ;;
   ;; Note that this function is incomplete, handling only those cases expected
   ;; to be common in a C++20 requires clause.
-  ;;
-  ;; Note also that (...) is not recognized as a primary expression if the
-  ;; next token is an open brace.
   (let ((here (point))
 	(c-restricted-<>-arglists t)
 	(c-parse-and-markup-<>-arglists nil)
@@ -9929,12 +9931,10 @@
 	 ((eq (char-after) ?\()
 	  (and (c-go-list-forward (point) limit)
 	       (eq (char-before) ?\))
-	       (let ((after-paren (point)))
-		 (c-forward-syntactic-ws limit)
-		 (prog1
-		     (not (eq (char-after) ?{))
-		   (when stop-at-end
-		     (goto-char after-paren))))))
+	       (progn
+		 (unless stop-at-end
+		   (c-forward-syntactic-ws limit))
+		 t)))
 	 ((c-forward-over-compound-identifier)
 	  (let ((after-id (point)))
 	    (c-forward-syntactic-ws limit)
@@ -9953,9 +9953,7 @@
 			  (c-forward-over-compound-identifier)
 			(c-forward-syntactic-ws limit))))))
 	    (goto-char after-id)))
-	 ((and
-	   (looking-at c-fun-name-substitute-key) ; "requires"
-	   (not (eq (char-after (match-end 0)) ?_)))
+	 ((looking-at c-fun-name-substitute-key) ; "requires"
 	  (goto-char (match-end 1))
 	  (c-forward-syntactic-ws limit)
 	  (and
@@ -10210,9 +10208,7 @@
 		   ((looking-at c-type-decl-suffix-key)
 		    (cond
 		     ((save-match-data
-			(and
-			 (looking-at c-fun-name-substitute-key)
-			 (not (eq (char-after (match-end 0)) ?_))))
+			(looking-at c-requires-clause-key))
 		      (c-forward-c++-requires-clause))
 		     ((eq (char-after) ?\()
 		      (if (c-forward-decl-arglist not-top decorated limit)
@@ -10667,10 +10663,8 @@
 	      (c-forward-keyword-clause 1)
 	      (when (and (c-major-mode-is 'c++-mode)
 			 (c-keyword-member kwd-sym 'c-<>-sexp-kwds)
-			 (save-match-data
-			   (and
-			    (looking-at c-fun-name-substitute-key)
-			    (not (eq (char-after (match-end 0)) ?_)))))
+			 (save-match-data ; Probably unnecessary (2024-09-20)
+			   (looking-at c-requires-clause-key)))
 		(c-forward-c++-requires-clause))
 	      (setq kwd-clause-end (point))))
 	   ((and c-opt-cpp-prefix
@@ -11028,9 +11022,7 @@
 		     ((save-match-data (looking-at "\\s("))
 		      (c-safe (c-forward-sexp 1) t))
 		     ((save-match-data
-			(and
-			 (looking-at c-fun-name-substitute-key)
-			 (not (eq (char-after (match-end 0)) ?_)))) ; C++ requires
+			(looking-at c-requires-clause-key))
 		      (c-forward-c++-requires-clause))
 		     (t (goto-char (match-end 1))
 			t))
@@ -13178,229 +13170,218 @@
   ;;
   ;; Here, "brace list" does not include the body of an enum.
   (save-excursion
-    (let ((start (point))
-	  (braceassignp 'dontknow)
-	  inexpr-brace-list bufpos macro-start res pos after-type-id-pos
-	  pos2 in-paren parens-before-brace
-	  paren-state paren-pos)
-
-      (setq res
-	    (or (progn (c-backward-syntactic-ws)
-		       (c-back-over-compound-identifier))
-		(c-backward-token-2 1 t lim)))
-      ;; Checks to do only on the first sexp before the brace.
-      ;; Have we a C++ initialization, without an "="?
-      (if (and (c-major-mode-is 'c++-mode)
-	       (cond
-		((and (or (not (memq res '(t 0)))
-			  (eq (char-after) ?,))
-		      (setq paren-state (c-parse-state))
-		      (setq paren-pos (c-pull-open-brace paren-state))
-		      (eq (char-after paren-pos) ?\())
-		 (goto-char paren-pos)
-		 (setq braceassignp 'c++-noassign
-		       in-paren 'in-paren))
-		((looking-at c-pre-brace-non-bracelist-key)
-		 (setq braceassignp nil))
-		((and
-		  (looking-at c-fun-name-substitute-key)
-		  (not (eq (char-after (match-end 0)) ?_)))
-		 (setq braceassignp nil))
-		((looking-at c-return-key))
-		((and (looking-at c-symbol-start)
-		      (not (looking-at c-keywords-regexp)))
-		 (if (save-excursion
-		       (and (zerop (c-backward-token-2 1 t lim))
-			    (looking-at c-pre-id-bracelist-key)))
-		     (setq braceassignp 'c++-noassign)
-		   (setq after-type-id-pos (point))))
-		((eq (char-after) ?\()
-		 (setq parens-before-brace t)
-		 ;; Have we a requires with a parenthesis list?
-		 (when (save-excursion
-			 (and (zerop (c-backward-token-2 1 nil lim))
-			      (looking-at c-fun-name-substitute-key)
-			      (not (eq (char-after (match-end 0)) ?_))))
+    (unless (and (c-major-mode-is 'c++-mode)
+		 (c-backward-over-lambda-expression lim))
+      (let ((start (point))
+	    (braceassignp 'dontknow)
+	    inexpr-brace-list bufpos macro-start res pos after-type-id-pos
+	    pos2 in-paren paren-state paren-pos)
+
+	(setq res
+	      (or (progn (c-backward-syntactic-ws)
+			 (c-back-over-compound-identifier))
+		  (c-backward-token-2 1 t lim)))
+	;; Checks to do only on the first sexp before the brace.
+	;; Have we a C++ initialization, without an "="?
+	(if (and (c-major-mode-is 'c++-mode)
+		 (cond
+		  ((and (or (not (memq res '(t 0)))
+			    (eq (char-after) ?,))
+			(setq paren-state (c-parse-state))
+			(setq paren-pos (c-pull-open-brace paren-state))
+			(eq (char-after paren-pos) ?\())
+		   (goto-char paren-pos)
+		   (setq braceassignp 'c++-noassign
+			 in-paren 'in-paren))
+		  ((looking-at c-pre-brace-non-bracelist-key)
 		   (setq braceassignp nil))
-		 nil)
-		(t nil))
-	       (save-excursion
-		 (cond
-		  ((or (not (memq res '(t 0)))
-		       (eq (char-after) ?,))
-		   (and (setq paren-state (c-parse-state))
-			(setq paren-pos (c-pull-open-brace paren-state))
-			(eq (char-after paren-pos) ?\()
-			(setq in-paren 'in-paren)
-			(goto-char paren-pos)))
-		  ((looking-at c-pre-brace-non-bracelist-key))
+		  ((looking-at c-fun-name-substitute-key)
+		   (setq braceassignp nil))
 		  ((looking-at c-return-key))
 		  ((and (looking-at c-symbol-start)
-			(not (looking-at c-keywords-regexp))
-			(save-excursion
-			  (and (zerop (c-backward-token-2 1 t lim))
-			       (looking-at c-pre-id-bracelist-key)))))
-		  (t (setq after-type-id-pos (point))
-		     nil))))
-	  (setq braceassignp 'c++-noassign))
-
-      (when (and c-opt-inexpr-brace-list-key
-		 (eq (char-after) ?\[))
-	;; In Java, an initialization brace list may follow
-	;; directly after "new Foo[]", so check for a "new"
-	;; earlier.
-	(while (eq braceassignp 'dontknow)
-	  (setq braceassignp
-		(cond ((/= (c-backward-token-2 1 t lim) 0) nil)
-		      ((looking-at c-opt-inexpr-brace-list-key)
-		       (setq inexpr-brace-list t)
-		       t)
-		      ((looking-at "\\sw\\|\\s_\\|[.[]")
-		       ;; Carry on looking if this is an
-		       ;; identifier (may contain "." in Java)
-		       ;; or another "[]" sexp.
-		       'dontknow)
-		      (t nil)))))
-
-      (setq pos (point))
-      (cond
-       ((not braceassignp)
-	nil)
-       ((and after-type-id-pos
-	     (goto-char after-type-id-pos)
-	     (setq res (c-back-over-member-initializers))
-	     (goto-char res)
-	     (eq (car (c-beginning-of-decl-1 lim)) 'same))
-	(cons (point) nil))		; Return value.
-
-       ((and after-type-id-pos
-	     (progn
-	       (c-backward-syntactic-ws)
-	       (eq (char-before) ?\()))
-	;; Single identifier between '(' and '{'.  We have a bracelist.
-	(cons after-type-id-pos 'in-paren))
-
-       ;; Are we at the parens of a C++ lambda expression?
-       ((and parens-before-brace
-	     (save-excursion
-	       (and
-		(zerop (c-backward-token-2 1 t lim))
-		(c-looking-at-c++-lambda-capture-list))))
-	nil)			     ; a lambda expression isn't a brace list.
-
-       (t
-	(goto-char pos)
-	(when (eq braceassignp 'dontknow)
-	  (let* ((cache-entry (and containing-sexp
-				   (c-laomib-get-cache containing-sexp pos)))
-		 (lim2 (or (cadr cache-entry) lim))
-		 sub-bassign-p)
-	    (if cache-entry
-		(cond
-		 ((<= (point) (cadr cache-entry))
-		  ;; We're inside the region we've already scanned over, so
-		  ;; just go to that scan's end position.
-		  (goto-char (nth 2 cache-entry))
-		  (setq braceassignp (nth 3 cache-entry)))
-		 ((> (point) (cadr cache-entry))
-		  ;; We're beyond the previous scan region, so just scan as
-		  ;; far as the end of that region.
-		  (setq sub-bassign-p (c-laomib-loop lim2))
-		  (if (<= (point) (cadr cache-entry))
-		      (progn
-			(c-laomib-put-cache containing-sexp
-					    start (nth 2 cache-entry)
-					    (nth 3 cache-entry) ;; sub-bassign-p
-					    )
-			(setq braceassignp (nth 3 cache-entry))
-			(goto-char (nth 2 cache-entry)))
-		    (c-laomib-put-cache containing-sexp
-					start (point) sub-bassign-p)
-		    (setq braceassignp sub-bassign-p)))
-		 (t))
-
-	      (setq braceassignp (c-laomib-loop lim))
-	      (when lim
-		(c-laomib-put-cache lim start (point) braceassignp)))))
-
+			(not (looking-at c-keywords-regexp)))
+		   (if (save-excursion
+			 (and (zerop (c-backward-token-2 1 t lim))
+			      (looking-at c-pre-id-bracelist-key)))
+		       (setq braceassignp 'c++-noassign)
+		     (setq after-type-id-pos (point))))
+		  ((eq (char-after) ?\()
+		   ;; Have we a requires with a parenthesis list?
+		   (when (save-excursion
+			   (and (zerop (c-backward-token-2 1 nil lim))
+				(looking-at c-fun-name-substitute-key)))
+		     (setq braceassignp nil))
+		   nil)
+		  (t nil))
+		 (save-excursion
+		   (cond
+		    ((or (not (memq res '(t 0)))
+			 (eq (char-after) ?,))
+		     (and (setq paren-state (c-parse-state))
+			  (setq paren-pos (c-pull-open-brace paren-state))
+			  (eq (char-after paren-pos) ?\()
+			  (setq in-paren 'in-paren)
+			  (goto-char paren-pos)))
+		    ((looking-at c-pre-brace-non-bracelist-key))
+		    ((looking-at c-return-key))
+		    ((and (looking-at c-symbol-start)
+			  (not (looking-at c-keywords-regexp))
+			  (save-excursion
+			    (and (zerop (c-backward-token-2 1 t lim))
+				 (looking-at c-pre-id-bracelist-key)))))
+		    (t (setq after-type-id-pos (point))
+		       nil))))
+	    (setq braceassignp 'c++-noassign))
+
+	(when (and c-opt-inexpr-brace-list-key
+		   (eq (char-after) ?\[))
+	  ;; In Java, an initialization brace list may follow
+	  ;; directly after "new Foo[]", so check for a "new"
+	  ;; earlier.
+	  (while (eq braceassignp 'dontknow)
+	    (setq braceassignp
+		  (cond ((/= (c-backward-token-2 1 t lim) 0) nil)
+			((looking-at c-opt-inexpr-brace-list-key)
+			 (setq inexpr-brace-list t)
+			 t)
+			((looking-at "\\sw\\|\\s_\\|[.[]")
+			 ;; Carry on looking if this is an
+			 ;; identifier (may contain "." in Java)
+			 ;; or another "[]" sexp.
+			 'dontknow)
+			(t nil)))))
+
+	(setq pos (point))
 	(cond
-	 (braceassignp
-	  ;; We've hit the beginning of the aggregate list.
-	  (setq pos2 (point))
-	  (cons
-	   (if (eq (c-beginning-of-statement-1 containing-sexp) 'same)
-	       (point)
-	     pos2)
-	   (or in-paren inexpr-brace-list)))
+	 ((not braceassignp)
+	  nil)
+	 ((and after-type-id-pos
+	       (goto-char after-type-id-pos)
+	       (setq res (c-back-over-member-initializers))
+	       (goto-char res)
+	       (eq (car (c-beginning-of-decl-1 lim)) 'same))
+	  (cons (point) nil))		; Return value.
+
 	 ((and after-type-id-pos
-	       (save-excursion
-		 (when (eq (char-after) ?\;)
-		   (c-forward-over-token-and-ws t))
-		 (setq bufpos (point))
-		 (when (looking-at c-opt-<>-sexp-key)
-		   (c-forward-over-token-and-ws)
-		   (when (and (eq (char-after) ?<)
-			      (c-get-char-property (point) 'syntax-table))
-		     (c-go-list-forward nil after-type-id-pos)
-		     (c-forward-syntactic-ws)))
-		 (if (and (not (eq (point) after-type-id-pos))
-			  (or (not (looking-at c-class-key))
-			      (save-excursion
-				(goto-char (match-end 1))
-				(c-forward-syntactic-ws)
-				(not (eq (point) after-type-id-pos)))))
-		     (progn
-		       (setq res
-			     (c-forward-decl-or-cast-1 (c-point 'bosws)
-						       nil nil))
-		       (and (consp res)
-			    (cond
-			     ((eq (car res) after-type-id-pos))
-			     ((> (car res) after-type-id-pos) nil)
-			     (t
-			      (catch 'find-decl
+	       (progn
+		 (c-backward-syntactic-ws)
+		 (eq (char-before) ?\()))
+	  ;; Single identifier between '(' and '{'.  We have a bracelist.
+	  (cons after-type-id-pos 'in-paren))
+
+	 (t
+	  (goto-char pos)
+	  (when (eq braceassignp 'dontknow)
+	    (let* ((cache-entry (and containing-sexp
+				     (c-laomib-get-cache containing-sexp pos)))
+		   (lim2 (or (cadr cache-entry) lim))
+		   sub-bassign-p)
+	      (if cache-entry
+		  (cond
+		   ((<= (point) (cadr cache-entry))
+		    ;; We're inside the region we've already scanned over, so
+		    ;; just go to that scan's end position.
+		    (goto-char (nth 2 cache-entry))
+		    (setq braceassignp (nth 3 cache-entry)))
+		   ((> (point) (cadr cache-entry))
+		    ;; We're beyond the previous scan region, so just scan as
+		    ;; far as the end of that region.
+		    (setq sub-bassign-p (c-laomib-loop lim2))
+		    (if (<= (point) (cadr cache-entry))
+			(progn
+			  (c-laomib-put-cache containing-sexp
+					      start (nth 2 cache-entry)
+					      (nth 3 cache-entry) ;; sub-bassign-p
+					      )
+			  (setq braceassignp (nth 3 cache-entry))
+			  (goto-char (nth 2 cache-entry)))
+		      (c-laomib-put-cache containing-sexp
+					  start (point) sub-bassign-p)
+		      (setq braceassignp sub-bassign-p)))
+		   (t))
+
+		(setq braceassignp (c-laomib-loop lim))
+		(when lim
+		  (c-laomib-put-cache lim start (point) braceassignp)))))
+
+	  (cond
+	   (braceassignp
+	    ;; We've hit the beginning of the aggregate list.
+	    (setq pos2 (point))
+	    (cons
+	     (if (eq (c-beginning-of-statement-1 containing-sexp) 'same)
+		 (point)
+	       pos2)
+	     (or in-paren inexpr-brace-list)))
+	   ((and after-type-id-pos
+		 (save-excursion
+		   (when (eq (char-after) ?\;)
+		     (c-forward-over-token-and-ws t))
+		   (setq bufpos (point))
+		   (when (looking-at c-opt-<>-sexp-key)
+		     (c-forward-over-token-and-ws)
+		     (when (and (eq (char-after) ?<)
+				(c-get-char-property (point) 'syntax-table))
+		       (c-go-list-forward nil after-type-id-pos)
+		       (c-forward-syntactic-ws)))
+		   (if (and (not (eq (point) after-type-id-pos))
+			    (or (not (looking-at c-class-key))
 				(save-excursion
-				  (goto-char (car res))
-				  (c-do-declarators
-				   (point-max) t nil nil
-				   (lambda (id-start _id-end _tok _not-top _func _init)
-				     (cond
-				      ((> id-start after-type-id-pos)
-				       (throw 'find-decl nil))
-				      ((eq id-start after-type-id-pos)
-				       (throw 'find-decl t)))))
-				  nil))))))
-		   (save-excursion
-		     (goto-char start)
-		     (not (c-looking-at-statement-block))))))
-	  (cons bufpos (or in-paren inexpr-brace-list)))
-	 ((or (eq (char-after) ?\;)
-	      ;; Brace lists can't contain a semicolon, so we're done.
-	      (save-excursion
-		(c-backward-syntactic-ws)
-		(eq (char-before) ?}))
-	      ;; They also can't contain a bare }, which is probably the end
-	      ;; of a function.
-	      )
-	  nil)
-	 ((and (setq macro-start (point))
-	       (c-forward-to-cpp-define-body)
-	       (eq (point) start))
-	  ;; We've a macro whose expansion starts with the '{'.
-	  ;; Heuristically, if we have a ';' in it we've not got a
-	  ;; brace list, otherwise we have.
-	  (let ((macro-end (progn (c-end-of-macro) (point))))
-	    (goto-char start)
-	    (forward-char)
-	    (if (and (c-syntactic-re-search-forward "[;,]" macro-end t t)
-		     (eq (char-before) ?\;))
-		nil
-	      (cons macro-start nil)))) ; (2016-08-30): Lazy! We have no
+				  (goto-char (match-end 1))
+				  (c-forward-syntactic-ws)
+				  (not (eq (point) after-type-id-pos)))))
+		       (progn
+			 (setq res
+			       (c-forward-decl-or-cast-1 (c-point 'bosws)
+							 nil nil))
+			 (and (consp res)
+			      (cond
+			       ((eq (car res) after-type-id-pos))
+			       ((> (car res) after-type-id-pos) nil)
+			       (t
+				(catch 'find-decl
+				  (save-excursion
+				    (goto-char (car res))
+				    (c-do-declarators
+				     (point-max) t nil nil
+				     (lambda (id-start _id-end _tok _not-top _func _init)
+				       (cond
+					((> id-start after-type-id-pos)
+					 (throw 'find-decl nil))
+					((eq id-start after-type-id-pos)
+					 (throw 'find-decl t)))))
+				    nil))))))
+		     (save-excursion
+		       (goto-char start)
+		       (not (c-looking-at-statement-block))))))
+	    (cons bufpos (or in-paren inexpr-brace-list)))
+	   ((or (eq (char-after) ?\;)
+		;; Brace lists can't contain a semicolon, so we're done.
+		(save-excursion
+		  (c-backward-syntactic-ws)
+		  (eq (char-before) ?}))
+		;; They also can't contain a bare }, which is probably the end
+		;; of a function.
+		)
+	    nil)
+	   ((and (setq macro-start (point))
+		 (c-forward-to-cpp-define-body)
+		 (eq (point) start))
+	    ;; We've a macro whose expansion starts with the '{'.
+	    ;; Heuristically, if we have a ';' in it we've not got a
+	    ;; brace list, otherwise we have.
+	    (let ((macro-end (progn (c-end-of-macro) (point))))
+	      (goto-char start)
+	      (forward-char)
+	      (if (and (c-syntactic-re-search-forward "[;,]" macro-end t t)
+		       (eq (char-before) ?\;))
+		  nil
+		(cons macro-start nil)))) ; (2016-08-30): Lazy! We have no
 					; languages where
 					; `c-opt-inexpr-brace-list-key' is
 					; non-nil and we have macros.
-	 (t t))))			;; The caller can go up one level.
-      )))
+	   (t t))))			;; The caller can go up one level.
+	))))
 
 (defun c-inside-bracelist-p (containing-sexp paren-state accept-in-paren)
   ;; return the buffer position of the beginning of the brace list statement
@@ -13652,7 +13633,7 @@
 		nil))
 	     ((progn
 		(goto-char req-pos)
-		(if (looking-at c-fun-name-substitute-key)
+		(if (looking-at c-requires-clause-key)
 		    (setq found-clause (c-forward-c++-requires-clause nil t))
 		  (and (c-forward-concept-fragment)
 		       (setq found-clause (point))))
@@ -13863,18 +13844,84 @@
 	 (looking-at c-pre-lambda-tokens-re)))
    (not (c-in-literal))))
 
+(defun c-looking-at-c++-lambda-expression (&optional lim)
+  ;; If point is at the [ opening a C++ lambda expressions's capture list,
+  ;; and the lambda expression is complete, return the position of the { which
+  ;; opens the body form, otherwise return nil.  LIM is the limit for forward
+  ;; searching for the {.
+  (let ((here (point))
+	(lim-or-max (or lim (point-max)))
+	got-params)
+    (when (and (c-looking-at-c++-lambda-capture-list)
+	       (c-go-list-forward nil lim))
+      (c-forward-syntactic-ws lim)
+      (when (c-forward-<>-arglist t)
+	(c-forward-syntactic-ws lim)
+	(when (looking-at c-requires-clause-key)
+	  (c-forward-c++-requires-clause lim nil)))
+      (when (looking-at "\\(alignas\\)\\([^a-zA-Z0-9_$]\\|$\\)")
+	(c-forward-keyword-clause 1))
+      (when (and (eq (char-after) ?\()
+		 (c-go-list-forward nil lim))
+	(setq got-params t)
+	(c-forward-syntactic-ws lim))
+      (while (and c-lambda-spec-key (looking-at c-lambda-spec-key))
+	(goto-char (match-end 1))
+	(c-forward-syntactic-ws lim))
+      (let (after-except-pos)
+	(while
+	    (and (<= (point) lim-or-max)
+		 (cond
+		  ((save-excursion
+		     (and (looking-at "throw\\([^a-zA-Z0-9_]\\|$\\)")
+			  (progn (goto-char (match-beginning 1))
+				 (c-forward-syntactic-ws lim)
+				 (eq (char-after) ?\())
+			  (c-go-list-forward nil lim)
+			  (progn (c-forward-syntactic-ws lim)
+				 (setq after-except-pos (point)))))
+		   (goto-char after-except-pos)
+		   (c-forward-syntactic-ws lim)
+		   t)
+		  ((looking-at c-paren-nontype-key) ; "noexcept" or "alignas"
+		   (c-forward-keyword-clause 1))))))
+      (and (<= (point) lim-or-max)
+	   (looking-at c-haskell-op-re)
+	   (goto-char (match-end 0))
+	   (progn (c-forward-syntactic-ws lim)
+		  (c-forward-type t)))	; t is BRACE-BLOCK-TOO.
+      (and got-params
+	   (<= (point) lim-or-max)
+	   (looking-at c-requires-clause-key)
+	   (c-forward-c++-requires-clause lim nil))
+      (prog1 (and (<= (point) lim-or-max)
+		  (eq (char-after) ?{)
+		  (point))
+	(goto-char here)))))
+
+(defun c-backward-over-lambda-expression (&optional lim)
+  ;; Point is at a {.  Move back over the lambda expression this is a part of,
+  ;; stopping at the [ of the capture list, if this is the case, returning
+  ;; the position of that opening bracket.  If we're not at such a list, leave
+  ;; point unchanged and return nil.
+  (let ((here (point)))
+    (c-syntactic-skip-backward "^;}]" lim t)
+    (if (and (eq (char-before) ?\])
+	     (c-go-list-backward nil lim)
+	     (eq (c-looking-at-c++-lambda-expression (1+ here))
+		 here))
+	(point)
+      (goto-char here)
+      nil)))
+
 (defun c-c++-vsemi-p (&optional pos)
   ;; C++ Only - Is there a "virtual semicolon" at POS or point?
   ;; (See cc-defs.el for full details of "virtual semicolons".)
   ;;
   ;; This is true when point is at the last non syntactic WS position on the
-  ;; line, and either there is a "macro with semicolon" just before it (see
-  ;; `c-at-macro-vsemi-p') or there is a "requires" clause which ends there.
-  (let (res)
-    (cond
-     ((setq res (c-in-requires-or-at-end-of-clause pos))
-      (and res (eq (cdr res) t)))
-     ((c-at-macro-vsemi-p)))))
+  ;; line, and there is a "macro with semicolon" just before it (see
+  ;; `c-at-macro-vsemi-p').
+  (c-at-macro-vsemi-p pos))
 
 (defun c-at-macro-vsemi-p (&optional pos)
   ;; Is there a "virtual semicolon" at POS or point?
@@ -14857,7 +14904,6 @@
 		   (progn (c-backward-syntactic-ws lim)
 			  (zerop (c-backward-token-2 nil nil lim)))
 		   (looking-at c-fun-name-substitute-key)
-		   (not (eq (char-after (match-end 0)) ?_))
 		   (setq placeholder (point))))
 	    (goto-char placeholder)
 	    (back-to-indentation)
@@ -15283,6 +15329,11 @@
 
 	 ;; NOTE: The point is at the end of the previous token here.
 
+	 ;; CASE 5U: We are just after a requires clause.
+	 ((and (setq placeholder (c-in-requires-or-at-end-of-clause))
+	       (eq (cdr-safe placeholder) t))
+	  (c-add-syntax 'topmost-intro-cont (car placeholder)))
+
 	 ;; CASE 5J: we are at the topmost level, make
 	 ;; sure we skip back past any access specifiers
 	 ((and
@@ -15818,8 +15869,7 @@
 		     (c-go-list-backward nil lim))
 		 (progn (c-backward-syntactic-ws lim)
 			(zerop (c-backward-token-2 nil nil lim)))
-		 (looking-at c-fun-name-substitute-key)
-		 (not (eq (char-after (match-end 0)) ?_))))
+		 (looking-at c-fun-name-substitute-key)))
 	  (goto-char containing-sexp)
 	  (back-to-indentation)
 	  (c-add-stmt-syntax 'defun-close nil t lim paren-state))
@@ -15983,8 +16033,7 @@
 		     (c-go-list-backward nil lim))
 		 (progn (c-backward-syntactic-ws lim)
 			(zerop (c-backward-token-2 nil nil lim)))
-		 (looking-at c-fun-name-substitute-key)
-		 (not (eq (char-after (match-end 0)) ?_))))
+		 (looking-at c-fun-name-substitute-key)))
 	  (goto-char containing-sexp)
 	  (back-to-indentation)
 	  (c-add-syntax 'defun-block-intro (point)))
diff -r 48ad661a2d7d cc-fonts.el
--- a/cc-fonts.el	Mon Jul 22 12:09:34 2024 +0000
+++ b/cc-fonts.el	Fri Sep 20 14:15:17 2024 +0000
@@ -1389,8 +1389,7 @@
 				  (memq type '(c-decl-arg-start
 					       c-decl-type-start))))))))
 		      ((and (zerop (c-backward-token-2))
-			    (looking-at c-fun-name-substitute-key)
-			    (not (eq (char-after (match-end 0)) ?_))))))))))
+			    (looking-at c-fun-name-substitute-key)))))))))
       ;; Cache the result of this test for next time around.
       (c-put-char-property (1- match-pos) 'c-type 'c-decl-arg-start)
       (cons 'decl nil))
diff -r 48ad661a2d7d cc-langs.el
--- a/cc-langs.el	Mon Jul 22 12:09:34 2024 +0000
+++ b/cc-langs.el	Fri Sep 20 14:15:17 2024 +0000
@@ -2639,6 +2639,19 @@
   t (c-make-keywords-re t (c-lang-const c-equals-type-clause-kwds)))
 (c-lang-defvar c-equals-type-clause-key (c-lang-const c-equals-type-clause-key))
 
+(c-lang-defconst c-lambda-spec-kwds
+  "Keywords which are specifiers of certain elements of a C++ lambda function.
+This is only used in C++ Mode."
+  t nil
+  c++ '("mutable" "constexpr" "consteval" "static"))
+
+(c-lang-defconst c-lambda-spec-key
+  ;; A regular expression which matches a member of `c-lambda-spec-kwds',
+  ;; or nil.
+  t (if (c-lang-const c-lambda-spec-kwds)
+	(c-make-keywords-re t (c-lang-const c-lambda-spec-kwds))))
+(c-lang-defvar c-lambda-spec-key (c-lang-const c-lambda-spec-key))
+
 (c-lang-defconst c-equals-nontype-decl-kwds
   "Keywords which are followed by an identifier then an \"=\"
 sign, which declares the identifier to be something other than a
@@ -2657,20 +2670,33 @@
 (c-lang-defconst c-fun-name-substitute-kwds
   "Keywords which take the place of type+declarator at the beginning
 of a function-like structure, such as a C++20 \"requires\"
-clause.  An arglist may or may not follow such a keyword."
+expression.  An arglist may or may not follow such a keyword.
+Not to be confused with `c-requires-clause-kwds'."
   t nil
   c++ '("requires"))
 
 (c-lang-defconst c-fun-name-substitute-key
   ;; An unadorned regular expression which matches any member of
   ;; `c-fun-name-substitute-kwds'.
-  t (c-make-keywords-re 'appendable (c-lang-const c-fun-name-substitute-kwds)))
+  t (c-make-keywords-re t (c-lang-const c-fun-name-substitute-kwds)))
 ;; We use 'appendable, so that we get "\\>" on the regexp, but without a further
 ;; character, which would mess up backward regexp search from just after the
 ;; keyword.  If only XEmacs had \\_>.  ;-(
 (c-lang-defvar c-fun-name-substitute-key
 	       (c-lang-const c-fun-name-substitute-key))
 
+(c-lang-defconst c-requires-clause-kwds
+  "Keywords which introduce a C++ requires clause, or something analogous.
+This should not be confused with `c-fun-name-substitute-kwds'."
+  t nil
+  c++ '("requires"))
+
+(c-lang-defconst c-requires-clause-key
+  ;; A regexp matching any member of `c-requires-clause-kwds'.
+  t (c-make-keywords-re t (c-lang-const c-requires-clause-kwds)))
+;; See `c-fun-name-substitute-key' for the justification of appendable.
+(c-lang-defvar c-requires-clause-key (c-lang-const c-requires-clause-key))
+
 (c-lang-defconst c-modifier-kwds
   "Keywords that can prefix normal declarations of identifiers
 \(and typically act as flags).  Things like argument declarations



> Seems to be working quite well in some contrived tests and a few
> fragments of realistic looking code.

> Thank you!

> Have a lovely evening.
> -- 
> Arsen Arsenović

-- 
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).




This bug report was last modified 294 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.