GNU bug report logs -
#72692
Emacs 31.05 (40eecd594ac) get SIGSEGV on Linux (Linux 6.6.45 Kde Wayland)
Previous Next
Reported by: Eval EXEC <execvy <at> gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2024 08:31:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>> Cc: pipcet <at> protonmail.com, execvy <at> gmail.com, 72692 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
>> juri <at> linkov.net
>> Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 15:26:07 +0300
>> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
>>
>> > From: Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com>
>> > Cc: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>, pipcet <at> protonmail.com,
>> > execvy <at> gmail.com, 72692 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>> > Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 20:06:17 +0800
>> >
>> > Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>> >
>> > > Po Lu, is there any reason why frame-parameter handlers for GUI frames
>> > > should ignore the fact that the new value of a parameter is exactly
>> > > equal to the old value? Is there some subtle issue here, and if so,
>> > > does it affect all the parameters or only some?
>> >
>> > No reason occurs to me why redundant changes shouldn't be discarded in
>> > the case of alpha-background, but modifications to other parameters
>> > (e.g. Qfullscreen) always trigger recomputation of various window
>> > manager properties and states, which is not redundant when these
>> > properties change without Emacs's knowledge.
>>
>> OK, I was aware of the issues with Qfullscreen.
>>
>> But what about the rest? Would you mind reviewing the other handlers
>> in frame.c, and telling which ones should do their thing regardless of
>> whether the old and the new value of the parameter are identical?
>
> Ping!
I will, but after the release. I'm a little drained of energy for these
matters at the moment.
This bug report was last modified 258 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.