GNU bug report logs - #72532
[PATCH] ; lisp/progmodes/which-func.el (which-function-mode): check buffer

Previous Next

Full log

Message #25 received at 72532-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Raffael Stocker <r.stocker <at> mnet-mail.de>
Cc: 72532-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, stefankangas <at> gmail.com
Subject: Re: bug#72532: [PATCH] ;
 lisp/progmodes/which-func.el (which-function-mode): check buffer
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 11:36:02 +0300

> Cc: 72532 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Raffael Stocker <r.stocker <at> mnet-mail.de>
> Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2024 21:59:46 +0200
> 
> Raffael Stocker <r.stocker <at> mnet-mail.de> writes:
> 
> > Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com> writes:
> >
> >> `buffer-list' is documented to return a list of all live buffers, so it
> >> would be good to understand why buffers are getting killed in this loop.
> >>
> >> In other words, are we sure that your patch is not just covering up some
> >> problem elsewhere?
> >
> > I guess it is.  I just did some trying out and found that I can reliably
> > make the problem appear and disappear by enabling/disabling eglot.
> >
> > I will spend some more time with this and see what more I can find out.
> 
> It seems the problem comes from me putting ‘which-function-mode’ into
> ‘prog-mode-hook’, which I probably shouldn't have done.  Each time I
> load a file in some prog-mode while eglot is active managing at least
> one buffer, which-function-mode seems to get re-enabled and cause my
> problems.  If I just globally enable it (as I probably should do), this
> doesn't happen.
> 
> In short, seems to be a pilot error.
> Why I still can't reproduce it with ‘emacs -Q’, I do not know.
> Still, not worth a patch it seems, sorry for the noise.

Thanks, I'm therefore closing this bug.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.