GNU bug report logs - #72442
31.0.50; Gnus or message.el doesn't handle international message reply subject prefixes and insults users

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Björn Bidar <bjorn.bidar <at> thaodan.de>
Cc: 72442 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, rpluim <at> gmail.com
Subject: bug#72442: 31.0.50; Gnus or message.el doesn't handle international message reply subject prefixes and insults users
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 22:30:10 +0200

> From: Björn Bidar <bjorn.bidar <at> thaodan.de>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>,  72442 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 20:04:16 +0200
> 
> Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com> writes:
> 
> >>>>>> On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 19:21:32 +0200, Björn Bidar <bjorn.bidar <at> thaodan.de> said:
> >
> >     Björn> The message manual is still tell insulting users and/or is inaccurate now:
> >
> >     >> ‘message-subject-re-regexp’
> >     >> Responses to messages have subjects that start with ‘Re: ’.  This
> >     >> is _not_ an abbreviation of the English word “response”, but it
> >     >> comes from the Latin “res”, and means “in the matter of”.  Some
> >     >> illiterate nincompoops have failed to grasp this fact, and have
> >     >> “internationalized” their software to use abominations like ‘Aw: ’
> >     >> (“antwort”) or ‘Sv: ’ (“svar”) instead, which is meaningless and
> >     >> evil.  However, you may have to deal with users that use these evil
> >     >> tools, in which case you may set this variable to a regexp that
> >     >> matches these prefixes.  Myself, I just throw away non-compliant
> >     >> mail.
> >
> >     Björn> (info "(message) Message Headers")
> >
> > That text is slightly different now, but Iʼm not going to bowdlerize
> > it further.
> 
> standards-challenged? The voicing is still passive aggressive. I think
> it should be enough to say some users might fail to understand or
> misunderstand. Even better could be to just drop the drop the offhanded
> comment.

We could choose other words, but are we not allowed in general to
express contempt towards silly decisions made out of ignorance?

> I don't think insulting or judging user who don't use English
> as their native language is a good thing.

As the text says, "res" is Latin, not English.  So this has nothing to
do with native English speakers.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.