GNU bug report logs - #72442
31.0.50; Gnus or message.el doesn't handle international message reply subject prefixes and insults users

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 72442 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bjorn.bidar <at> thaodan.de
Subject: bug#72442: 31.0.50; Gnus or message.el doesn't handle international message reply subject prefixes and insults users
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 16:52:17 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

>>>>> Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com> said:

>>>>> On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 19:39:28 +0300, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> said:
    >>> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
    >>> Cc: bjorn.bidar <at> thaodan.de,  72442 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
    >>> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 17:50:41 +0200
    >>> 
    >>> >>>>> On Thu, 22 Aug 2024 15:15:03 +0300, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> said:
    >>> 
    Eli> For backward compatibility, let's leave rmail-re-abbrevs in place, and
    Eli> just initialize it from that new defcustom.
    >>>

OK
    >>> +          "\\(\\[[0-9]*\\]\\)*"
    >>> +          " ?\u00a0*[:：][ \t]*"

    Eli> These two parts could use a comment that explains what they handle.

    >>> +                       "\\(([0-9]+)\\|\\[[0-9]+\\]\\|\\^[0-9]+\\)?"
    >>> +                       " ?\u00a0*[:：][ \t]*\\)*[ \t]*")))

    Eli> Same here.

Done. The rmail and gnus code now use exactly the same final regexp
derived from the new user option. Patch attached, itʼs been working
fine for me in Gnus, but somebody who uses rmail should give it a go.

Robert
-- 

[0001-Teach-gnus-message-about-international-Re-variants.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.