GNU bug report logs - #72406
[PATCH emacs-team WIP 0/4] Simplify creation of emacs package variants

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>

Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 21:02:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com>, 72406 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: cox.katherine.e+guix <at> gmail.com, gemmaro.dev <at> gmail.com, liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com, andrew <at> trop.in
Subject: [bug#72406] [PATCH emacs-team WIP v4 07/24] gnu: emacs-eweouz: Build variants.
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2024 17:47:14 +0200
Hi Liliana,

On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 at 14:58, Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> (emacs-minimal-eweouz, emacs-next-eweouz, emacs-pgtk-eweouz): New variables.

An open question: do we need them?  I mean since
package-with-emacs-minimal is provided, it’s easy to create such
variant.  Therefore, the question becomes: is it useful to provide
substitutes?

Building Emacs packages is most of the time quick and requires few
resources, so it’s not painful to do it locally in case an user want
such variant.

And, it avoids some combinatorial maintenance burden.  Although Emacs
compiling toolchain is stable, it can be boring to ensure all the
variants still correctly build.

Instead, we could imagine some transformation option, let say
--with-emacs-toolchain=PACKAGE=TOOLCHAIN.

WDYT?

Cheers,
simon




This bug report was last modified 284 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.