From unknown Sun Sep 14 15:18:56 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#72369 <72369@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#72369 <72369@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: srfi-64: test-end fails to signal an error with null runner Reply-To: bug#72369 <72369@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2025 22:18:56 +0000 retitle 72369 srfi-64: test-end fails to signal an error with null runner reassign 72369 guile submitter 72369 Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> severity 72369 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jul 30 15:52:27 2024 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jul 2024 19:52:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48462 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sYstW-0006Xr-SA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 15:52:27 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:44596) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <~@wolfsden.cz>) id 1sYstL-0006WI-Gt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 15:52:16 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <~@wolfsden.cz>) id 1sYst6-0004sW-Nb for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 15:52:00 -0400 Received: from wolfsden.cz ([37.205.8.62]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <~@wolfsden.cz>) id 1sYst4-0006qu-42 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 15:52:00 -0400 Received: by wolfsden.cz (Postfix, from userid 104) id A5170293A06; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 19:51:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=wolfsden.cz; s=mail; t=1722369114; bh=aqXFbyYUxYvRahW1IBghzh0KrzMD8DvZodw1kM23E5w=; h=Date:From:To:Subject; b=KbiFvEeUpynbx1yl950GTYztapd/925oVMPjufZN9qWAz2k54MxAtrQqhP1IEl1QT WbX9zIMykXrg7UwGGj01m1biK2AYy7g/R8/xmAWY03QchFGgWNdxuunN3hqzbq2XaY +LK3YZNZxSyB9TLf+asIcPXO8VOUHkX015JQQpMOSk6KVttm10+AtKbQ+HuDvCs1QL OBvbTPYHqGcUCW/H8DZ+4S4U9rdRG631T53D4c4q+ngxjNjc9ddvKRAcV8NJcEWf/B S3cQP+9BlKzX5BSPmMlfOnZ8Q+2iY+UisHBdO/YvqMRghJX1yNh1UW4vSTGY0DZvFp DuMmrwSe0kf3BOLNaZAP4vxAOvBZkecbz7gJMYJ372aLshK/zxfa6ahfxjRTq949YK OjOjd43hmAyPUD5ktJPMhojKIDqieg3UDW8NwGkBO0H4MzB9dGwaBjtozINr9mMS/9 xCgGAFRLITHagfiw0VygyFBcQOWNbAciOXV7zHroQKMNIbyU8naXpAXxiuSx46W1nP yKphUxBnTx2I5Nn3PnzPAivMsTrkGMSII+jj6tsbIQ4LBc1AB/gn6TlkrzQpJmCDho u25dqyfpZnYJtGKODQIZcOhSJVfLdZ414QM/xxqKpnaZ3WK7xj9CPui/7Tfl3xHkY2 nCqG6uJW+Bb6GZcLwqZS5tCw= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on wolfsden X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from localhost (unknown [128.0.188.242]) by wolfsden.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6AC282926B0 for ; Tue, 30 Jul 2024 19:51:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=wolfsden.cz; s=mail; t=1722369114; bh=aqXFbyYUxYvRahW1IBghzh0KrzMD8DvZodw1kM23E5w=; h=Date:From:To:Subject; b=KbiFvEeUpynbx1yl950GTYztapd/925oVMPjufZN9qWAz2k54MxAtrQqhP1IEl1QT WbX9zIMykXrg7UwGGj01m1biK2AYy7g/R8/xmAWY03QchFGgWNdxuunN3hqzbq2XaY +LK3YZNZxSyB9TLf+asIcPXO8VOUHkX015JQQpMOSk6KVttm10+AtKbQ+HuDvCs1QL OBvbTPYHqGcUCW/H8DZ+4S4U9rdRG631T53D4c4q+ngxjNjc9ddvKRAcV8NJcEWf/B S3cQP+9BlKzX5BSPmMlfOnZ8Q+2iY+UisHBdO/YvqMRghJX1yNh1UW4vSTGY0DZvFp DuMmrwSe0kf3BOLNaZAP4vxAOvBZkecbz7gJMYJ372aLshK/zxfa6ahfxjRTq949YK OjOjd43hmAyPUD5ktJPMhojKIDqieg3UDW8NwGkBO0H4MzB9dGwaBjtozINr9mMS/9 xCgGAFRLITHagfiw0VygyFBcQOWNbAciOXV7zHroQKMNIbyU8naXpAXxiuSx46W1nP yKphUxBnTx2I5Nn3PnzPAivMsTrkGMSII+jj6tsbIQ4LBc1AB/gn6TlkrzQpJmCDho u25dqyfpZnYJtGKODQIZcOhSJVfLdZ414QM/xxqKpnaZ3WK7xj9CPui/7Tfl3xHkY2 nCqG6uJW+Bb6GZcLwqZS5tCw= Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 21:51:54 +0200 From: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> To: bug-guile@gnu.org Subject: srfi-64: test-end fails to signal an error with null runner Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=37.205.8.62; envelope-from=~@wolfsden.cz; helo=wolfsden.cz X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Hello, I think I found a bug in (srfi srfi-64) module shipped with GNU Guile. The specification says the following about the test-end: > An error is reported if the suite-name does not match the current test group > name. Thus the following should signal an error: (use-modules (srfi srfi-64)) (let ((r (test-runner-null))) (test-runner-current r) (test-begin "x") (test-end "y")) However it does not. Have a nice day Tomas Volf From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Sep 30 12:24:15 2024 Received: (at 72369) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Sep 2024 16:24:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45722 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1svJC3-0001we-1E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2024 12:24:15 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f54.google.com ([209.85.221.54]:39374) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1svJC0-0001wW-6R for 72369@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2024 12:24:13 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f54.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-37cc5ba03c6so300606f8f.1 for <72369@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 30 Sep 2024 09:23:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1727713353; x=1728318153; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=fAiQKO/2McUghLjCfHLSL0mOSvUMnE+E3Iy42uzbwbY=; b=iwXXfMkOJ3/oRX2uQaZIVOXXvCH/FhXZTa1Zp/FDw1m3oAyKeyZMevlXJ6W0CkVOBP So7BpsVbfq8J7CdldWuBVRFq9OHqwNGEXHhyqrqG66Ffmu5Z5qCmRM7lSO9GCEC/ar34 IAIEEmWj5A0j7rCA9taNUehV8/MbFgfjO8mgbVYOZZ8APpksXk8Ze/rfEMtzBWqew9rZ Dk+ThTfNJrDnvUXheXDzAlBppsdJZsTlZXrEj4fDPcmhWJymLcuuE4dHcBWvuickyxgs NCmiynDgaXsuYn7QFANolwJfY++8BSHsVxkelehxQK24Bx3Cn1Fj214G5V20W5e3Jbyo KdDA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1727713353; x=1728318153; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=fAiQKO/2McUghLjCfHLSL0mOSvUMnE+E3Iy42uzbwbY=; b=vUGbExP6h7ch5pE5b45dAlFyEqUjK3sUNOqcMntRKJGKS2uOEiHEgioIPmdSGN3MbD gOQse1H0HyWRqBbiRjxEIcZgh2zyW81GgRj+LMZkDwalVB2kARzBJq0C3HwdcIo2pe7K vrUb64kZCsuJbAQzO/zttdwCT/oz94ZnVDzW/LZ19lu3SNALLAyJVJejkcbvyrb3baJr zx13pjKql9B68qai2S/s42IlIVxL6uXPPo8EzdzxwkwnhBdzSrrYJU0U4pifhZU+Qdij yqmaZS9bsrDRc3Pkt7gzpKkMC+lHtvBPXgW8fC8fXhRO7rT0C6lFOjE0x8d/2/OhbCYP DEFg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVDpJG1kvbM5Rb2t+bk5Wz3mwyVfqaCMzCYBwijdcQqHf4eG7edAeeD8p0npHONswjTqGAN0Q==@debbugs.gnu.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz+8nClf1OdF9MjOFrBaDBSqPtDiTFNrv+q5lPuIHCJPGfxzDGU EM5FF4HrgKmClIDSOGUxEdBdiq6+kJRuwPyO3YNEEYA95J3nks0GY8Jpf8xjScU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGvlsxji2tB8Pn62g6BhdxDypFOVAU0szjs3g3NLKDADKfHEQQarq7m5COOWIIYTbJ4/KecEw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6c6e:0:b0:374:cd01:8b72 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-37cde446cffmr2672374f8f.9.1727713353227; Mon, 30 Sep 2024 09:22:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2003:106:8f04:c300:192e:476d:8ae3:22f2? (p200301068f04c300192e476d8ae322f2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:106:8f04:c300:192e:476d:8ae3:22f2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-37cd5730e9dsm9360770f8f.71.2024.09.30.09.22.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 30 Sep 2024 09:22:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <95bfa264-aa8f-4811-9def-276ed5a1b041@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 18:22:32 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: bug#72369: srfi-64: test-end fails to signal an error with null runner To: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz>, 72369@debbugs.gnu.org References: Content-Language: en-US From: Taylan Kammer In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 72369 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) On 30.07.2024 21:51, Tomas Volf wrote: > Hello, > > I think I found a bug in (srfi srfi-64) module shipped with GNU Guile. > > The specification says the following about the test-end: > >> An error is reported if the suite-name does not match the current test group >> name. > Thus the following should signal an error: > > (use-modules (srfi srfi-64)) > (let ((r (test-runner-null))) > (test-runner-current r) > (test-begin "x") > (test-end "y")) > > However it does not. > > Have a nice day > Tomas Volf This would be easy to change, but the on-bad-end-name handler would be kind of useless if test-end was hardcoded to always raise an error. I think the intended meaning of the spec is that the default/simple test runner reports an error in this case (by implementing the on-bad-end-name handler) but not test-end itself. One could argue that "reporting" an error is not the same thing as signaling/raising one. We could make test-end always print something to stderr, but not actually raise an error, so it technically fulfills the spec's promise that it "reports" an error, but the usefulness of this is unclear to me. Opinions welcome. - Taylan From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 02 15:57:13 2024 Received: (at 72369) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Oct 2024 19:57:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59320 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sw5TF-0005Gu-E5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2024 15:57:13 -0400 Received: from wolfsden.cz ([37.205.8.62]:41094) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <~@wolfsden.cz>) id 1sw5TD-0005Gk-AP for 72369@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2024 15:57:12 -0400 Received: by wolfsden.cz (Postfix, from userid 104) id E03A53139B4; Wed, 2 Oct 2024 19:57:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=wolfsden.cz; s=mail; t=1727899028; bh=y3pm/deuPaV53S/q7qQs4cJOUDL4Y0uqg7t02/mkslY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=C7kq+kpGyQdoYQIPxAFlCtdnkja+Sf2X4KPiyz3/XReAWDKO/oaSSF2xkX9T7aONW 5Ij3wZ/bLY2PWIJm//KcciD3rOjKxvHKOQwuJqQQQ35eT95vrj9GgN4Ny+/1M2TOAR /4CvJjuZBD+NTjZidgrHw+x7YMi1Br17Pzw0lX0+GdfVR1Qm6+xaWItkP/RkFTc2Vy FACQ05bzHchgtwluhSoxtjB9odIyQowJtHOa2q9nr62u8V39J4JcKrX8XsCZm1a7BX Uw19JzWgKHjMzDc2zWGwzzWFjY+B4y4bJghCsKtVl2EAEslFscAq3DMJqiwRjE72oC 1ctxY90O1B9SAoC22Pzy9U3zllHPxDiRtfqsYKE0WXmovu12rz1jmzSIRxuAf4ImFO Rfb3AH0ekKMeFSRnX9E5dsf5tgos5w8fJx3vCgOK2kCL9b2LcBfK2cqpV/iP441qTN OXXmSYkLOKgAFpFjX3C1SLYmc0X5CAQtzyKaiFiSdCRgerKQHD4MfmJ8ZstcYTTRiq 8CpeZiWD+zAnOT7u0+XhzfRxru4P2+GQVzCxeFYcZ2sgBLiwHxqf7UWJOdi4qTxZEf vOsUsmyHXh8ZWQecK0SzSF1FMEnGZJZaGUpcUBS5OTXVONMSW9kzDSMQrtfORPJoSa xOg8zWFdDCl1ri/yg3Yh3YGQ= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on wolfsden X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from localhost (unknown [128.0.188.242]) by wolfsden.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 89DEC313228; Wed, 2 Oct 2024 19:57:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=wolfsden.cz; s=mail; t=1727899028; bh=y3pm/deuPaV53S/q7qQs4cJOUDL4Y0uqg7t02/mkslY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=C7kq+kpGyQdoYQIPxAFlCtdnkja+Sf2X4KPiyz3/XReAWDKO/oaSSF2xkX9T7aONW 5Ij3wZ/bLY2PWIJm//KcciD3rOjKxvHKOQwuJqQQQ35eT95vrj9GgN4Ny+/1M2TOAR /4CvJjuZBD+NTjZidgrHw+x7YMi1Br17Pzw0lX0+GdfVR1Qm6+xaWItkP/RkFTc2Vy FACQ05bzHchgtwluhSoxtjB9odIyQowJtHOa2q9nr62u8V39J4JcKrX8XsCZm1a7BX Uw19JzWgKHjMzDc2zWGwzzWFjY+B4y4bJghCsKtVl2EAEslFscAq3DMJqiwRjE72oC 1ctxY90O1B9SAoC22Pzy9U3zllHPxDiRtfqsYKE0WXmovu12rz1jmzSIRxuAf4ImFO Rfb3AH0ekKMeFSRnX9E5dsf5tgos5w8fJx3vCgOK2kCL9b2LcBfK2cqpV/iP441qTN OXXmSYkLOKgAFpFjX3C1SLYmc0X5CAQtzyKaiFiSdCRgerKQHD4MfmJ8ZstcYTTRiq 8CpeZiWD+zAnOT7u0+XhzfRxru4P2+GQVzCxeFYcZ2sgBLiwHxqf7UWJOdi4qTxZEf vOsUsmyHXh8ZWQecK0SzSF1FMEnGZJZaGUpcUBS5OTXVONMSW9kzDSMQrtfORPJoSa xOg8zWFdDCl1ri/yg3Yh3YGQ= From: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> To: Taylan Kammer Subject: Re: bug#72369: srfi-64: test-end fails to signal an error with null runner In-Reply-To: <95bfa264-aa8f-4811-9def-276ed5a1b041@gmail.com> (Taylan Kammer's message of "Mon, 30 Sep 2024 18:22:32 +0200") References: <95bfa264-aa8f-4811-9def-276ed5a1b041@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2024 21:57:08 +0200 Message-ID: <87h69u46sr.fsf@wolfsden.cz> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 72369 Cc: 72369@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Taylan Kammer writes: Hi, > On 30.07.2024 21:51, Tomas Volf wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I think I found a bug in (srfi srfi-64) module shipped with GNU Guile. >> >> The specification says the following about the test-end: >> >>> An error is reported if the suite-name does not match the current test group >>> name. >> Thus the following should signal an error: >> >> (use-modules (srfi srfi-64)) >> (let ((r (test-runner-null))) >> (test-runner-current r) >> (test-begin "x") >> (test-end "y")) >> >> However it does not. >> >> Have a nice day >> Tomas Volf > > This would be easy to change, but the on-bad-end-name handler would be kind of > useless if test-end was hardcoded to always raise an error. I think the intended > meaning of the spec is that the default/simple test runner reports an error in > this case (by implementing the on-bad-end-name handler) but not test-end itself. > > One could argue that "reporting" an error is not the same thing as > signaling/raising one. We could make test-end always print something to stderr, > but not actually raise an error, so it technically fulfills the spec's promise > that it "reports" an error, but the usefulness of this is unclear to me. > > Opinions welcome. I think I reacted to these concerns in response to #72365, but for completeness pasting the same here: I agree that raising an error is good behavior. However I do not think that on-bad-end-name-function is a place where to do it. In my opinion the name mismatch is a hard error, in my implementation subclass of &programming-error[4]. If I am writing new test runner, the specification does not mention that raising the error is *my* responsibility, just that test-end will signal an error. To rephrase that: test-end is mandated to signal error, but custom test runner has no provision requiring it to do it in on-bad-end-name-function. Hence I believe test-end needs to be the one to signal the error. However! That does not make on-bad-end-name-function useless. The specification does not mandate *how* the error signaled by test-end should look like, hence there is no *portable* way to detect it. Custom runner, if it needs to report name mismatch specially, can just produce specific log line in the callback (or even signal its own exception first before test-end does). Let me know what you think (either here or in #72365 ^_^ ). Tomas -- There are only two hard things in Computer Science: cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Oct 02 17:17:59 2024 Received: (at 72369) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Oct 2024 21:18:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59395 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sw6jP-0001mE-KA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2024 17:17:59 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f48.google.com ([209.85.128.48]:38747) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sw6jN-0001m4-Vf for 72369@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2024 17:17:58 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f48.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-42cb1866c8fso209655e9.3 for <72369@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 02 Oct 2024 14:17:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1727903816; x=1728508616; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=in-reply-to:from:content-language:references:cc:to:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=UTr+08EN8J36CBb/Ohf3gEAZ0jmZa4MGlEI7vQjvaLg=; b=Fu0W5nlSTULuo+dhPz7z7LLUMoXIJqBJs2wHPc1QYzyvLmZ/X1fBwvMdVegWmKjvbK 8qKzp5gjuCYJifD96TSljFdwrDbOc90d4zc11ItUEA1SbcWP8i/E5HXkSgjKmGhfh00/ khcKRJlUE71gbxu2B8cpRslZP5NbhFglRT7QqF/L+lU0wnY1bN7vdBKo1Jy6uzVnvBwf Sw6MaYRvaARCqPQ88vJvwr8ReJ+J6r8f37Ftm/8EOf+NYXpFZRbIUiVU6i3DEUryxshF VvmFi07QbfIniRbp60KTvZtOgrGWTB60IRzOUuWmq+7+Xlry3Lrew50mSdx0x8YoNhxz bm0A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1727903816; x=1728508616; h=in-reply-to:from:content-language:references:cc:to:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=UTr+08EN8J36CBb/Ohf3gEAZ0jmZa4MGlEI7vQjvaLg=; b=hDRhJ/M+X6/RzmPLmOMVhhMs6Y7iQz9dd9bNpXmgetc2A7TZuJbt9XEScR+bIZgHbs BbDnqxmtFQdlqYGGbj+B8TUkmuH9irm6m+sw4Au6nT2OGCvYZjMICsDXA1LZVa4W+AUI TtMjAVVxtwcR9Z5sBUYI2zE8Er/L0JyGDXFPTo15brfA+dd609rKvLXzKtzgF7AMpMau DsYvJqcpyNLaxnVGxX5KS8GYMdfnciIMeFkuon2v67vKhU1ZOHVYqBPT3+Q4e2I2SHX/ soGXYHj3+xxN8vWCgNYaJyFM0sJTqzJMlxZHEOaVhYSsyd67Q4f9nbmLood55xx6Xiuv APDg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwlZQnO+wRdgqOnqSnbUTQZketCcbO18iOOxUVFRJXDKEb8VY0v 3z3mx8FADvTI4kyfL3N1o5fmFLkhCk1h8PcMPrXnQ/JZ/IqHXejnBRZzNgEzzoA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH9azE96FWWkVmxULQ7skA/8iy4JzgW5rR8ePc72js1F1rt2/EVX7tJa829lpMX6aaEsYEOoA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:3509:b0:42c:d084:ed69 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-42f777ed291mr16611595e9.4.1727903815927; Wed, 02 Oct 2024 14:16:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2003:106:8f04:c300:23:dfca:ebd4:aa57? (p200301068f04c3000023dfcaebd4aa57.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:106:8f04:c300:23:dfca:ebd4:aa57]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-42f7e2af1c4sm6228065e9.21.2024.10.02.14.16.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 02 Oct 2024 14:16:55 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------tWNLm8XvOl9GNQGnL4VtHmMC" Message-ID: Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 23:16:54 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: bug#72369: srfi-64: test-end fails to signal an error with null runner To: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> References: <95bfa264-aa8f-4811-9def-276ed5a1b041@gmail.com> <87h69u46sr.fsf@wolfsden.cz> Content-Language: en-US From: Taylan Kammer In-Reply-To: <87h69u46sr.fsf@wolfsden.cz> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 72369 Cc: 72369@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------tWNLm8XvOl9GNQGnL4VtHmMC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02.10.2024 21:57, Tomas Volf wrote: > Let me know what you think (either here or in #72365 ^_^ ). > > Tomas Sure thing! Responded in the other thread. - Taylan --------------tWNLm8XvOl9GNQGnL4VtHmMC Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 02.10.2024 21:57, Tomas Volf wrote:
Let me know what you think (either here or in #72365 ^_^ ).

Tomas

Sure thing! Responded in the other thread.

- Taylan

--------------tWNLm8XvOl9GNQGnL4VtHmMC-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 21 16:29:35 2024 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Oct 2024 20:29:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53574 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1t2z1z-0004ZT-Fa for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 16:29:35 -0400 Received: from wolfsden.cz ([37.205.8.62]:38902) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <~@wolfsden.cz>) id 1t2z1n-0004YL-2a for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 16:29:23 -0400 Received: by wolfsden.cz (Postfix, from userid 104) id 8A42633199A; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 20:28:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=wolfsden.cz; s=mail; t=1729542535; bh=dPr9j/jsL09tz9VXqMH7JKrCMFv1k/3DUl06WpH1UUM=; h=Date:To:From:Subject; b=YtEQ1bwpy24uBT53IVbKk9gO8BKJb+IAIa+GXDOJRmOpXey6oTewRodssfOEd3yCE 2lExBIrwQLs4PTt9O80G0aFkrXTPvTmB+fe7Kw6B35FGs/2UsULt/dY57lyyZmOfBd HIF7fGS6VzPKRKIo6qZQt32ly/z9MeO0Uu3OBHBOGsCch36y8TOaP3cC8n85CUu+O0 4fFSV82cRXljSffcsIvLrPyTpTPoOB3bt+olcYmX4/dSZb9hXKLTD0JbX2Cu3K/8Gu Zf5ZsJBtC0t5830ond1ycpeOu/ltB6AJL4DAg8AttkSIVDjbkT03JCtF6pJJoTpUS3 lGcfpMQ2aQNr12Iy6J2t2cxjP5PhhlDBZstMHpn/TW0PRDHLortr3lS/a9V1eteDMl HEJzUKU5H4YFxSa8/2pBN2cMv05yQO4l9L4S4zGX3IwwXBtjVBm3q/Ynhn5D1cYMLu 8YVGbAKkjkDDpBOT5nvNiADcYNp05RbbaRa2KPOlsyWIz4yEQUPUt0jZbhvghTciNg Uy1UB39peC3/AUYihENtadxv5EY0QgiDt1VNARp9wRodM3NPFrUwZuSWArAx3Uo8TY /VyWHdNtwgxOSVNUnCQ0DR6BBDjNqzemONTUZ25n+4B+0+DKOw0yI70bFg7T/Eoe4n 77xCJqC/tSDJSNCIcmo70fug= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on wolfsden X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from localhost (unknown [193.32.127.157]) by wolfsden.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2A56B33149A for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 20:28:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=wolfsden.cz; s=mail; t=1729542535; bh=dPr9j/jsL09tz9VXqMH7JKrCMFv1k/3DUl06WpH1UUM=; h=Date:To:From:Subject; b=YtEQ1bwpy24uBT53IVbKk9gO8BKJb+IAIa+GXDOJRmOpXey6oTewRodssfOEd3yCE 2lExBIrwQLs4PTt9O80G0aFkrXTPvTmB+fe7Kw6B35FGs/2UsULt/dY57lyyZmOfBd HIF7fGS6VzPKRKIo6qZQt32ly/z9MeO0Uu3OBHBOGsCch36y8TOaP3cC8n85CUu+O0 4fFSV82cRXljSffcsIvLrPyTpTPoOB3bt+olcYmX4/dSZb9hXKLTD0JbX2Cu3K/8Gu Zf5ZsJBtC0t5830ond1ycpeOu/ltB6AJL4DAg8AttkSIVDjbkT03JCtF6pJJoTpUS3 lGcfpMQ2aQNr12Iy6J2t2cxjP5PhhlDBZstMHpn/TW0PRDHLortr3lS/a9V1eteDMl HEJzUKU5H4YFxSa8/2pBN2cMv05yQO4l9L4S4zGX3IwwXBtjVBm3q/Ynhn5D1cYMLu 8YVGbAKkjkDDpBOT5nvNiADcYNp05RbbaRa2KPOlsyWIz4yEQUPUt0jZbhvghTciNg Uy1UB39peC3/AUYihENtadxv5EY0QgiDt1VNARp9wRodM3NPFrUwZuSWArAx3Uo8TY /VyWHdNtwgxOSVNUnCQ0DR6BBDjNqzemONTUZ25n+4B+0+DKOw0yI70bFg7T/Eoe4n 77xCJqC/tSDJSNCIcmo70fug= Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 22:28:54 +0200 Message-ID: To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Tomas Volf <~@wolfsden.cz> Subject: control message for bug #72369 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) close 72369 quit From unknown Sun Sep 14 15:18:56 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 12:24:16 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator