GNU bug report logs - #72344
[PATCH] Add a version of cl-once-only which handles lists of forms

Previous Next

Full log

Message #50 received at 72344 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: Thuna <thuna.cing <at> gmail.com>, Sean Whitton <spwhitton <at> spwhitton.name>
Cc: "72344 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <72344 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Subject: RE: [External] : Re: bug#72344: [PATCH] Add a version of cl-once-only
 which handles lists of forms
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 21:36:08 +0000

> If Drew wants to start a new conversation to move `cl-once-only' (and
> also this) out of cl-lib we can also just go with any name now and then
> finalize it afterwards, though of all the names the one I favor is still
> `cl-once-only-multiple' above all others (sans `cl-once-only*' which is
> not an option - unless if you changed your mind about it?).

I've said all I have to say on the matter.
I seem to be a minority of one, and won't
bother starting any new thread about it.

I will however, repeat it here, for the record.

We've deviated from prefix cl- being only for
emulations of Common Lisp constructs.  At
first just a little, but more and more over
time.  I really don't see the point of that.
And I've never heard any good reason for it.

I understand that cl- is a library prefix,
so the functions etc. defined there should
take the library prefix.

What I object to is adding non-internal
constructs to this library that aren't
part of Common Lisp (and are generally not
even related).

I have no objection to using prefix cl--
(internal prefix) for utility functions &
macros in the library - i.e., for plumbing
needed to support the actual emulation.

Since the point of the library is (used to
be, at least) ONLY to emulate CL constructs,
I think cl- should be reserved for those
constructs, and anything else in it should
use cl--.

Yes, that would mean moving un-CL functions
etc. out of the library, to somewhere else.
And yes, that would mean replacing their
cl- prefix with whatever prefix is right
for their new location.  And enforce the
rule thereafter that you don't get to add
wonderful-whatever-function to the library
and give it prefix cl-.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.