GNU bug report logs - #72328
[PATCH] Nested backquote in pcase

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Thuna <thuna.cing <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2024 01:06:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de>
Cc: monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, thuna.cing <at> gmail.com, 72328 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#72328: [PATCH] Nested backquote in pcase
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2024 14:53:26 +0300
> From: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen <at> web.de>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>,  monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca,
>   72328 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2024 05:33:40 +0200
> 
> Thuna <thuna.cing <at> gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > I don't see how we can discuss whether this patch has enough benefits to
> > clear the hurdle of backwards-incompatibility if you are not willing to
> > engage with the discussion of what this patch's benefits *are* to begin
> > with.
> 
> He sees that of course, but it is not what he has asked for because it
> is obviously not enough.
> 
> Eli has to ask these questions, he is just doing his job.  He has to
> weight backward incompatibilities and potential breakage against
> potential further improvements.  The second is what his question is
> about.  If you as the one who proposes this change can't answer it with
> concrete examples, how could he come to a decision?
> 
> So I suggest to avoid meta discussions about what we expect and
> how others should behave and, even if it sucks, try to answer Eli's
> questions without questioning his reasons and intentions all the time.

Thanks for representing my POV so clearly.




This bug report was last modified 236 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.