Subject: Re: bug#72328: [PATCH] Nested backquote in pcase

From: Michael Heerdegen <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2024 16:52:09 +0200

Hello Thuna,

> a comma should match its argument as a pattern only if it escapes the
> original backquote (currently comma at all depths "escape" the
> original backquote).

why do you want to behave `pcase' like that?

This would be a backward-incompatible change, breaking existing code.

And this change would break the symmetry between `backquote' the macro
and backquote patterns in `pcase'.  This is an important design idea.
And I don't see any advantage either.

Michael.