GNU bug report logs - #72309
propertized-buffer-identification with maximum width

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Heime <heimeborgia <at> protonmail.com>
Cc: 72309 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#72309: propertized-buffer-identification with maximum width
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 16:00:39 +0300

> Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 12:23:20 +0000
> From: Heime <heimeborgia <at> protonmail.com>
> Cc: 72309 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
> 
> On Sunday, July 28th, 2024 at 12:05 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> 
> > > Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2024 09:22:21 +0000
> > > From: Heime heimeborgia <at> protonmail.com
> > > Cc: 72309 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> > > 
> > > On Saturday, July 27th, 2024 at 5:48 PM, Eli Zaretskii eliz <at> gnu.org wrote:
> > > 
> > > > tags 72309 notabug
> > > > thanks
> > > > 
> > > > > Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 19:04:14 +0000
> > > > > From: Heime via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
> > > > > the Swiss army knife of text editors" bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
> > > > > 
> > > > > propertized-buffer-identification could be improved so that when using a
> > > > > maximum width there are three dots and a space at the end to indicate
> > > > > that the buffer name has been truncated.
> > > > 
> > > > Emacs doesn't truncate the buffer name shown on the mode line, so no
> > > > ellipsis should be needed, ever. IOW, the maximum width is basically
> > > > infinity.
> > > > 
> > > > Where did you see the buffer name truncated on the mode line?
> > > 
> > > There is this construct
> > > 
> > > (width rest…)
> > > 
> > > which specifies truncation or padding of the results of rest.
> > > 
> > > If used on the buffer name it just truncates without specification
> > > that truncation occurred.
> > 
> > 
> > Where in the Emacs code did you see that? I cannot find anything like
> > that in bindings.el, which is where we have the code used for
> > displaying the buffer name on the mode line.
> 
> The last entry in "24.4.2 The Data Structure of the Mode Line".
> 
> I have tried it and setting a maximum width does work and the abrupt 
> truncation in the buffer name does occur.  

Yes, but the (WIDTH something) construct is not for truncating long
names, it's for ensuring the string produced by "something" doesn't
take too many columns.  So you are using this for a wrong purpose.  If
you want to truncate a buffer's name, use truncate-string-to-width
instead, which is also capable of showing the ellipsis at the end.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.