GNU bug report logs -
#7228
coreutils-8.6 sort-float failure on ppc
Previous Next
Reported by: "Gilles Espinasse" <g.esp <at> free.fr>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 14:48:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Tue, 31 May 2011 23:26:27 +0200
with message-id <87boyiftoc.fsf <at> rho.meyering.net>
and subject line Re: bug#7228: coreutils-8.6 sort-float failure on ppc
has caused the GNU bug report #7228,
regarding coreutils-8.6 sort-float failure on ppc
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)
--
7228: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=7228
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Just tested 8.6 on linux glibc-2.11.1/gcc-4.4.5 LFS build on x86, sparc and
ppc
First a good news is that on sparc (32-bits), 8.6 test suite is now passing
I didn't report yet a failure on misc/stty which was
Failure was
+ stty -icanon
stty: standard input: unable to perform all requested operations
The bad news is that it fail now on ppc in FAIL: misc/sort-float
+ LC_ALL=C
+ sort -sg
+ compare out exp
+ diff -u out exp
--- out 2010-10-16 13:40:44.000000000 +0000
+++ exp 2010-10-16 13:40:44.000000000 +0000
@@ -2,11 +2,11 @@
-1.797693e+308
-3.402823e+38
-1.175494e-38
--2.004168e-292
-2.225074e-308
+-2.004168e-292
0
-2.225074e-308
2.004168e-292
+2.225074e-308
1.175494e-38
3.402823e+38
1.797693e+308
+ fail=1
...
+ LC_ALL=fr_FR
+ sort -sg
+ compare out exp
+ diff -u out exp
--- out 2010-10-16 13:40:44.000000000 +0000
+++ exp 2010-10-16 13:40:44.000000000 +0000
@@ -2,11 +2,11 @@
-1,797693e+308
-3,402823e+38
-1,175494e-38
--2,004168e-292
-2,225074e-308
+-2,004168e-292
0
-2,225074e-308
2,004168e-292
+2,225074e-308
1,175494e-38
3,402823e+38
1,797693e+308
+ fail=1
+ Exit 1
Gilles
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Gilles Espinasse wrote:
>>> > The bad news is that it fail now on ppc in FAIL: misc/sort-float
>>> >
>> It's ok now with the patch on ppc.
>> It's ppc32, not 64 (gcc have --with-long-double-128 option if that matter)
>
> Thanks. Adjusted. I reproduced the failure also on ppc64.
This was resolved, afaics, so closing.
This bug report was last modified 13 years and 363 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.