Subject: bug#72212: 31.0.50; API for condition objects

From: Stefan Monnier <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 15:24:06 -0400

> FWIW, your patch looks good to me, and seems like it's moving in a good
> direction.

Thanks.

> I think we should keep the word "condition", and think we could have
> aliases "define-condition" and "condition-message-string" like you
> propose.

OK, sounds good.  I'll prepare a more complete patch.

        Stefan