GNU bug report logs - #72125
[PATCH 0/4] gajim: Update to latest version

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Gisement <sisiutl <at> egregore.fun>

Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 16:47:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #29 received at 72125 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: 宋文武 <iyzsong <at> envs.net>
To: Gisement <sisiutl <at> egregore.fun>
Cc: 72125 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#72125] [PATCH 1/4] gnu: python-protobuf: Update to 5.27.2.
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 19:57:44 +0800
Gisement <sisiutl <at> egregore.fun> writes:

> Change-Id: Ibaf04dd3d66789ab0e2407e25e1a79e55f4d6e4d
> ---
>  gnu/packages/protobuf.scm | 14 +++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/protobuf.scm b/gnu/packages/protobuf.scm
> index d47b67fa61..ef91a1b838 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/protobuf.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/protobuf.scm
> @@ -429,21 +429,21 @@ (define-public python-nanopb
>  (define-public python-protobuf
>    (package
>      (name "python-protobuf")
> -    (version "3.20.2")
> +    (version "5.27.2")

Hello, this will broke packages (eg: onnx) which still depends on
protobuf < 4, the packages list can be get via:
  guix refresh --list-dependent python-protobuf

I guess onnx is not the only one will fail.

Maybe introduce as a new 'python-protobuf-5' package?




This bug report was last modified 70 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.