From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:21:26 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#7206: 24.0.50; Bugs with minibuffer completion Resent-From: Tim Van Holder Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:58:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 7206 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 7206@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.128697104110793 (code B ref -1); Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:58:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Oct 2010 11:57:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P5zxQ-0002o2-Or for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:57:20 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P5zxP-0002nw-W2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:57:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P600i-0003KF-Qr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 08:00:50 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:52563) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P600i-0003Jq-KR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 08:00:44 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33875 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P600b-0006J4-Vs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 08:00:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P5xOg-0001VA-8T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 05:13:19 -0400 Received: from crm.anubex.com ([194.78.75.179]:53391 helo=mail.anubex.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P5xOg-0001UY-2X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 05:13:18 -0400 Received: from localhost (kraatos.anubex.internal [127.0.0.1]) by mail.anubex.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95E27EC01C7; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:13:14 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at anubex.com Received: from mail.anubex.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.anubex.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I1u79tZfWjEB; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:12:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from leeloo.anubex.internal (leeloo.anubex.internal [192.168.14.202]) by mail.anubex.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7ACEEBE979; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:12:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tim by leeloo.anubex.internal with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P5xON-0004Dl-EG; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:12:59 +0200 From: Tim Van Holder Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:12:59 +0200 Message-ID: <877hhme9r8.fsf@leeloo.anubex.internal> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Spam-Score: -5.6 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.6 (-----) Current bzr (r101947) has 2 issues with completion in the minibuffer: Recipe: $ emacs -Q C-x C-f Issue #1: Enter anything that has a non-unique completion (or don't enter anything at all after ther default directory name prompt), and press [tab]. Instead of getting the "[Complete, but not unique]" prompt, you get an error instead: minibuffer-completion-help: Wrong type argument: listp, 0 (the integer varies). This also happens with non-path completions (e.g. C-h f). Issue #2: Put point inside the path prompt and delete the trailing part of a path component, taking care to still keep a unique prefix to avoid hitting issue #1. Pressing [tab] to re-complete the path component works fine, but point "jumps back" several positions. This does not happen for completions at the end of the path, nor does it seem to heppen for non-path completions (at least for [C-h f] the problem does not seem to exist). In GNU Emacs 24.0.50.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.8.20) of 2010-10-13 on leeloo Windowing system distributor `The Cygwin/X Project', version 11.0.10503000 configured using `configure '--with-x'' From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:21:26 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#7206: 24.0.50; Bugs with minibuffer completion Resent-From: Stephen Berman Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7206 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Tim Van Holder Cc: 7206@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 7206-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7206.128699500922247 (code B ref 7206); Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:37:02 +0000 Received: (at 7206) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Oct 2010 18:36:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P66C0-0005mm-JP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:36:49 -0400 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23] helo=mail.gmx.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P66Bx-0005mg-Kj for 7206@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 14:36:46 -0400 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 13 Oct 2010 18:40:15 -0000 Received: from i59F55F24.versanet.de (EHLO escher.home) [89.245.95.36] by mail.gmx.net (mp007) with SMTP; 13 Oct 2010 20:40:15 +0200 X-Authenticated: #20778731 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/a5RhTehfamWXkp4R28azGgb7acfFHzACRalb833 pc6U6/RSehA8P0 Received: by escher.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A85E01042E; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 20:40:13 +0200 (CEST) From: Stephen Berman References: <877hhme9r8.fsf@leeloo.anubex.internal> Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 20:40:13 +0200 In-Reply-To: <877hhme9r8.fsf@leeloo.anubex.internal> (Tim Van Holder's message of "Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:12:59 +0200") Message-ID: <87fwwa0wdu.fsf@escher.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:12:59 +0200 Tim Van Holder wrote: > Current bzr (r101947) has 2 issues with completion in the minibuffer: > > Recipe: > > $ emacs -Q > C-x C-f > > Issue #1: > > Enter anything that has a non-unique completion (or don't enter > anything at all after ther default directory name prompt), and press > [tab]. Instead of getting the "[Complete, but not unique]" prompt, you > get an error instead: > minibuffer-completion-help: Wrong type argument: listp, 0 > (the integer varies). > This also happens with non-path completions (e.g. C-h f). This is due to this change: 2010-10-13 IRIE Shinsuke (tiny change) * subr.el (last): Make it faster. (Bug#7174) Here is a fix: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-patch Content-Disposition: inline Content-Description: fix for last *** /data/steve/bzr/emacs/trunk/lisp/subr.el 2010-10-13 14:41:39.000000000 +0200 --- /data/steve/bzr/emacs/quickfixes/lisp/subr.el 2010-10-13 20:34:46.000000000 +0200 *************** *** 290,299 **** If N is bigger than the length of LIST, return LIST." (if n (and (> n 0) ! (let ((m (length list))) (if (< n m) (nthcdr (- m n) list) list))) (and list ! (nthcdr (1- (length list)) list)))) (defun butlast (list &optional n) "Return a copy of LIST with the last N elements removed." --- 290,299 ---- If N is bigger than the length of LIST, return LIST." (if n (and (> n 0) ! (let ((m (safe-length list))) (if (< n m) (nthcdr (- m n) list) list))) (and list ! (nthcdr (1- (safe-length list)) list)))) (defun butlast (list &optional n) "Return a copy of LIST with the last N elements removed." --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Steve Berman --=-=-=-- From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:21:26 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Tim Van Holder Subject: bug#7206: closed (Re: bug#7206: 24.0.50; Bugs with minibuffer completion) Message-ID: References: <877hhme9r8.fsf@leeloo.anubex.internal> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 7206 X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs Reply-To: 7206@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 23:12:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1287011522-29670-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1287011522-29670-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #7206: 24.0.50; Bugs with minibuffer completion which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 7206@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 7206: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D7206 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1287011522-29670-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 7206-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Oct 2010 23:11:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P6ATz-0007iM-4G for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 19:11:39 -0400 Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com ([209.85.214.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P6ATx-0007iG-DN for 7206-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 19:11:37 -0400 Received: by iwn10 with SMTP id 10so6694361iwn.3 for <7206-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:15:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=vYh9IP4BhoXXfzWwkf3qiVF851ay6wRfklBQE5N6f2E=; b=E6xy0kD6gHAGKy1OWhNaqqrvx6TsOccztMx3WuvbHfSMXPKw6WJyVMp5idZhAqMSo2 VbAq1Xkjzqnu0c6VHEw1oe5uO30neHfyoJ6tlhhFsuxG98npDkRcYlvg7/onG9otbYFi nY8YXgnfiXFL0oMAuKeEDJWYpF8z9TPWtJlig= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=d4ooHHtDnY45e5kcb01giY0fMgXtf04l4HblTtj7cLEyqADQd0f5d3pNjYMNcSuM1u klB4ybTozgvZ4PBXZQg8zIkE4zoL8/fTV7c3HSdTvxtb8UxRiq/6BJJr8v7x9tLs+RkL F+uUq/f6B0MCTSqknqXMwV/so0/t8zJmAXelQ= Received: by 10.231.39.205 with SMTP id h13mr7716986ibe.148.1287011708100; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:15:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.180.226 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:14:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87fwwa0wdu.fsf@escher.home> References: <877hhme9r8.fsf@leeloo.anubex.internal> <87fwwa0wdu.fsf@escher.home> From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 01:14:27 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#7206: 24.0.50; Bugs with minibuffer completion To: Stephen Berman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 7206-done Cc: Tim Van Holder , 7206-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 20:40, Stephen Berman wrot= e: > Here is a fix: Applied, thanks. =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma ------------=_1287011522-29670-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Oct 2010 11:57:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P5zxQ-0002o2-Or for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:57:20 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P5zxP-0002nw-W2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:57:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P600i-0003KF-Qr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 08:00:50 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:52563) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P600i-0003Jq-KR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 08:00:44 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33875 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P600b-0006J4-Vs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 08:00:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P5xOg-0001VA-8T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 05:13:19 -0400 Received: from crm.anubex.com ([194.78.75.179]:53391 helo=mail.anubex.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P5xOg-0001UY-2X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 05:13:18 -0400 Received: from localhost (kraatos.anubex.internal [127.0.0.1]) by mail.anubex.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95E27EC01C7; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:13:14 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at anubex.com Received: from mail.anubex.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.anubex.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I1u79tZfWjEB; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:12:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from leeloo.anubex.internal (leeloo.anubex.internal [192.168.14.202]) by mail.anubex.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7ACEEBE979; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:12:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tim by leeloo.anubex.internal with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P5xON-0004Dl-EG; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:12:59 +0200 From: Tim Van Holder To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 24.0.50; Bugs with minibuffer completion Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:12:59 +0200 Message-ID: <877hhme9r8.fsf@leeloo.anubex.internal> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Spam-Score: -5.6 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.6 (-----) Current bzr (r101947) has 2 issues with completion in the minibuffer: Recipe: $ emacs -Q C-x C-f Issue #1: Enter anything that has a non-unique completion (or don't enter anything at all after ther default directory name prompt), and press [tab]. Instead of getting the "[Complete, but not unique]" prompt, you get an error instead: minibuffer-completion-help: Wrong type argument: listp, 0 (the integer varies). This also happens with non-path completions (e.g. C-h f). Issue #2: Put point inside the path prompt and delete the trailing part of a path component, taking care to still keep a unique prefix to avoid hitting issue #1. Pressing [tab] to re-complete the path component works fine, but point "jumps back" several positions. This does not happen for completions at the end of the path, nor does it seem to heppen for non-path completions (at least for [C-h f] the problem does not seem to exist). In GNU Emacs 24.0.50.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.8.20) of 2010-10-13 on leeloo Windowing system distributor `The Cygwin/X Project', version 11.0.10503000 configured using `configure '--with-x'' ------------=_1287011522-29670-1-- From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:21:26 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#7206: 24.0.50; Bugs with minibuffer completion Resent-From: Tim Van Holder Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 08:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7206 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Juanma Barranquero Cc: Stephen Berman , 7206@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 7206-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7206.128704457917434 (code B ref 7206); Thu, 14 Oct 2010 08:23:02 +0000 Received: (at 7206) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Oct 2010 08:22:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P6J5W-0004X9-TM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 04:22:59 -0400 Received: from mail-ww0-f46.google.com ([74.125.82.46]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P6J5V-0004X4-El for 7206@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 04:22:57 -0400 Received: by wwb24 with SMTP id 24so33577wwb.15 for <7206@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 01:26:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=IyQZTkD3CKTWjFqvoqnclnwJQUG3dorCfSDJpn84Ono=; b=OOHHXLLq6yDbHozI/SL5VrJo8bxeSbBKaPGu6Ys+ZxHVyH4timPlaQ238gi57cmLjx Z0rgYe1PIqkuVgMup6YQSSkp+jVGO2Zu5/q6j+MIMqZSOBdo6T0S2v5dRdqqR4Oh5s2O JhThssWCFKwg0UEix5+5gxZTXsgke/GwSzFiE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=rpSGEaLInUMrgePYiq/NvfpanOf0zx0OjHbIMHPiACY29M9ZuD9peIEyWw7lqDaYdM WvXvu/KxZh3VEKKMLSlbLAsdaSYrmkF6R/nRSVQKl5z83Ic7xlYybKR1e5JgAByKIeaj 6P60x8VHNDRPFV12LfAzJ49/HQlSTDoVPJRlI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.49.212 with SMTP id x62mr9524166web.55.1287044447034; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 01:20:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.163.65 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 01:20:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <877hhme9r8.fsf@leeloo.anubex.internal> <87fwwa0wdu.fsf@escher.home> Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 10:20:46 +0200 Message-ID: From: Tim Van Holder Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On 14 October 2010 01:14, Juanma Barranquero wrote: > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 20:40, Stephen Berman wrote: > >> Here is a fix: > > Applied, thanks. That indeed fixes issue #1, but issue #2 remains in bzr 101960. Should I file a separate report for that one (so this one can stay closed), or will you reopen this one? From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:21:26 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#7206: 24.0.50; Bugs with minibuffer completion Resent-From: Juanma Barranquero Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 10:10:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7206 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Tim Van Holder Cc: Stephen Berman , 7206@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 7206-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7206.128705099225600 (code B ref 7206); Thu, 14 Oct 2010 10:10:03 +0000 Received: (at 7206) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Oct 2010 10:09:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P6Kkx-0006er-MY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 06:09:51 -0400 Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com ([209.85.214.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P6Kkw-0006em-Tc for 7206@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 06:09:51 -0400 Received: by iwn10 with SMTP id 10so7268378iwn.3 for <7206@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 03:13:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ij2xLLE3R6BYB5UDGuy0B0NTzKI/KX3JisxLy+EMaus=; b=b842u9ATd13AdIyWJZ63WJ3PXOEnVpq28iWwdhNN5+p/SD8AHM5NevCjCH6HRThm60 Qjm/fSdr6IlscMV7Cn2ep9kBJ94CV3m2PZHT5qTNOBZVazUrixusvSnBWbPBYgFPxP3H cyojpld0PeRFOkPje0M+1qtKsg1TDTD17Ya3o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=r2CyJ90vu0hcHC4jNoNcRS/8HU9yeavj5o+qT8CBKEe567FQTA2RYL4jNJ1CnYjGBK eDeOSy4VCPLWAvfY8drv1YQH9uFz8zxmjRCGKqg7GeBSUBxFsoiMdkGtN1CypK++Sg14 Q9tUE+x5XIaz8FWX/2P9NH5YlqMjVts+SOTJA= Received: by 10.42.103.78 with SMTP id l14mr5419971ico.131.1287051202204; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 03:13:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.180.226 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 03:12:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <877hhme9r8.fsf@leeloo.anubex.internal> <87fwwa0wdu.fsf@escher.home> From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 12:12:41 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:20, Tim Van Holder wro= te: > That indeed fixes issue #1, but issue #2 remains in bzr 101960. Should > I file a separate report for that one (so this one can stay closed), > or will you reopen this one? Please file another bug report. Thanks, =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma