GNU bug report logs -
#71934
31.0.50; edebug--called-interactively-skip vs. new fun objects
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Hello, Michael.
On Sat, Jul 06, 2024 at 03:06:24 +0200, Michael Heerdegen wrote:
> Alan Mackenzie <acm <at> muc.de> writes:
> > > > All very clever arguments, no doubt, but in the end it means you
> > > > cannot native compile foo.
> > > To obey the docstring, ....
> > Forget that doc string, just do what is right, expected, and convenient
> > for Emacs users, and adjust the doc string afterwards.
> We are actually trying to do that, but we don't understand the code
> because of the lacking or wrong documentation.
Would that code be comp--spill-lap-function, perhaps? There are
currently three functions with that name, each for a different type of
argument.
It's apparent that the one that used to work,
(cl-defmethod comp--spill-lap-function ((form list))
, no longer works since function forms were converted to a different
format in March. It needs modifying to handle the new format.
> Maybe we already had introduced a regression because of that. And now
> three people try to guess what the code does. Our time is also
> valuable, Alan. This documentation is important.
I don't really see where the problem is: comp--spill-lap-function, all
versions, isolates the Lisp source form, passes it to the byte compiler
and receives the intermediate compiled form in the hash table
byte-to-native-lambdas-h. This intermediate form is then fed to the
native compilation engine.
Or am I not understanding what you're asking?
> Michael.
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
This bug report was last modified 314 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.