Package: emacs;
Reported by: Troy Hinckley <troyhinckley <at> dabrev.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 05:17:04 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
View this message in rfc822 format
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> To: Troy Hinckley <troyhinckley <at> dabrev.com> Cc: 71896 <at> debbugs.gnu.org Subject: bug#71896: shell-resync-dirs hang Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2024 12:58:00 +0300
> Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2024 21:22:35 -0500 > From: Troy Hinckley <troyhinckley <at> dabrev.com> > > This is related to #59804 and #54384. > > I will occasionally (about 30% of the time) see hangs when running shell-resync-dirs in Emacs 29. I tracked this > down to two issues: > > First is in shell-eval-command. For Emacs 29 this function was added to fix #54384. It has this section in the > code: > > ``` > ;; Wait until we get a prompt (which will be a line without > ;; a newline). This is far from fool-proof -- if something > ;; outputs incomplete data and then sleeps, we'll think > ;; we've received the prompt. > (while (not (let* ((lines (string-lines result)) > (last (car (last lines)))) > (and (length> lines 0) > (not (equal last "")) > (or (not prev) > (not (equal last prev))) > (setq prev last)))) > (accept-process-output proc 0 100)) > ``` > > Note that is says that is looking for “a line without a newline” to determine if we have reached the prompt. > However this code does not actually do that. If the result ends in a newline it will still terminate the loop and not > wait for more input. We can see that by the fact that the following code evaluates to nil. > > ``` > (let ((result "dirs\n") prev) > (not (let* ((lines (string-lines result)) > (last (car (last lines)))) > (and (length> lines 0) > (not (equal last "")) > (or (not prev) > (not (equal last prev))) > (setq prev last))))) > ``` > > I am not sure what this code is supposed to do, but the issue arrises if the process output sends anything to > this function it will terminate and not wait for more input. In my case the issue is that the shell is echoing the > command followed by the result (comint-process-echoes). About 30% of the time these two lines get sent as > part of two different outputs. Meaning the second line (the directory for shell-resync-dirs) does not get captured > and instead gets printed to the terminal. Does the patch below solve the problem in shell-eval-command? > This leads us to the hang. The issue is this code in shell-resync-dirs: > > ``` > (while dlsl > (let ((newelt "") > tem1 tem2) > (while newelt > ;; We need tem1 because we don't want to prepend > ;; `comint-file-name-prefix' repeatedly into newelt via tem2. > (setq tem1 (pop dlsl) > tem2 (concat comint-file-name-prefix tem1 newelt)) > (cond ((file-directory-p tem2) > (push tem2 ds) > (when (string= " " (car dlsl)) > (pop dlsl)) > (setq newelt nil)) > (t > (setq newelt (concat tem1 newelt))))))) > ``` > > This loop can only terminate if tem2 is a valid directory. Otherwise it will take the default case in the cond and > loop forever. And since the bug in shell-eval-command does not provide the directory when the process output > is split, we get a hang. > > I believe both of these need to be fixed to properly fix the bug. > > For the shell-eval-command I don’t understand what that loop is trying to do now, so I am not sure how to fix it > without breaking its functionality. I would just use (string-suffix-p “\n” result) to check if the output ends in a > newline, but the code is obviously trying to do something more complex there. > > If we fix that issue then it will resolve the hang in shell-resync-dirs, but I think that is just glossing over the > problem. That functions should never hang, no matter what output it get’s from the shell. My recommendation > would be to add `(and dlsl newelt)` as the condition for the inner while loop with newelt. That way if dlsl is > empty, it will terminate the loop since there is nothing more to process. This fixed the issue for me. Thanks, I think I agree with your suggestion for shell-resync-dirs. But please undo the fix you evidently made there to avoid the infloop, and see if the patch below for shell-eval-command makes shell-resync-dirs do its job by correctly resynchronizing shell-dirtrack. diff --git a/lisp/shell.el b/lisp/shell.el index e1936ff..f86156e 100644 --- a/lisp/shell.el +++ b/lisp/shell.el @@ -1629,10 +1629,12 @@ shell-eval-command ;; a newline). This is far from fool-proof -- if something ;; outputs incomplete data and then sleeps, we'll think ;; we've received the prompt. - (while (not (let* ((lines (string-lines result)) - (last (car (last lines)))) + (while (not (let* ((lines (string-lines result nil t)) + (last (car (last lines))) + (last-end (substring last -1))) (and (length> lines 0) - (not (equal last "")) + (not (member last '("" "\n"))) + (not (equal last-end "\n")) (or (not prev) (not (equal last prev))) (setq prev last))))
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.