GNU bug report logs -
#71858
[PATCH shepherd] doc: Patches should be sent to guix-patches instead of guix-devel.
Previous Next
Full log
Message #11 received at 71858 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> > From: Attila Lendvai attila <at> lendvai.name
> >
> > ---
> > doc/shepherd.texi | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>
> What are you looking to get from this change?
i'm confused, so let's sync some assumptions:
are you/we happy that shepherd patches end up on guix-devel?
because i've just sent several shepherd patches to guix-devel, and when i thought about it, i wouldn't be happy to receive a storm of non-guix patches on guix-devel. hence my patch to the manual.
> Personally, I think being able to assume that patches sent to
> guix-patches are for guix is helpful, e.g. some of the automated tooling
> depends on this assumption.
i don't know enough about the infrastructure, and i don't have a strong opinion about where to send this. it just felt wrong to send it to guix-devel, and then guix-patches sounded at least a little better. that's all. i'm open for other suggestions, including that the status quo is fine.
--
• attila lendvai
• PGP: 963F 5D5F 45C7 DFCD 0A39
--
“It requires a great deal of physical tension and mental energy to hold back feelings and memories. This energy can lead to chronic tension, headaches, aches and pains and many other physical problems. It also keeps the body in a heightened state of stress and makes people more vulnerable to anxiety, panic attacks, illness & injury.”
— Carolyn Ainscough & Kay Toon, 'Surviving Childhood Sexual Abuse'
This bug report was last modified 344 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.