GNU bug report logs -
#71763
[PATCH] Inconsistency in bitmap overlay drawing for macOS
Previous Next
Full log
Message #17 received at 71763 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>> From: Daniel Pettersson <daniel <at> dpettersson.net>
>> Cc: 71763 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 11:26:50 +0100
>>
>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>>
>> > Can some macOS expert please review the proposed patch?
>> Seems like they are hard to come by.
>>
>> I have been using this patch since I reported the bug, how can I help
>> move this along?
>
> Thanks, but maybe Gerd (CCed) will agree to look at this?
The struct draw_fringe_bitmap_params is not documented very well, so
I've looked at fringe.c for what its overlay_p member means. I landed in
draw_fringe_bitmap_1, where draw_fringe_bitmap_params::overlay_p is set
if that function is called with an overlay parameter that fits some
criterion, which one can try to figure out in its caller
draw_fringe_bitmap. It apparently has something to do with drawing a
cursor in a fringe, and then also drawing an overlay arrow.
Didn't even know until a few minutes ago that the cursor can land in
the fringe. And I'm wondering if that ever happens in the left fringe,
and/or if the overlay arrow appears only on the left. Questions upon
questions, as usual.
Anyway. Assuming that I read the code correctly, that we are drawing a
cursor and overlay arrow on top of each other, then I think Daniel's
patch makes sense, because drawing the overlay arrow should not clear
under it and erase what was drawn for the cursor before.
That's about what I could find out. NS should do something different if
overlay_p is set or not, I think that's for sure. And if Daniel says it
works, that's goog enough for me I guess.
This bug report was last modified 262 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.