GNU bug report logs - #71716
[PATCH] Add new completion-preview-insert-{word,sexp} commands

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Jules Tamagnan <jtamagnan <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 09:12:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Fixed in version 31.1

Done: Eshel Yaron <me <at> eshelyaron.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #52 received at control <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eshel Yaron <me <at> eshelyaron.com>
To: Jules Tamagnan <jtamagnan <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 71716 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#71716: [PATCH] Add new completion-preview-insert-{word,
 sexp} commands
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 17:00:15 +0200
close 71716 31.1
quit

Jules Tamagnan <jtamagnan <at> gmail.com> writes:

> Eshel Yaron <me <at> eshelyaron.com> writes:
>
>> Thank you, pushed to master as commit b3017e7c252, after some tweaks to
>> the commit message.  I've also pushed a follow up commit (9cb2a204088)
>> with some minor refinements, see the commit message for details.  One
>> notable change is that completion-preview-partial-insert does not force
>> point to the position of the preview overlay ("end") before calling the
>> motion function.  This makes completion-preview-insert-word behave more
>> like forward-word when point is in the middle of a multi-word symbol,
>> with the completion preview at the end of that symbol.  I've added
>> another test case that demonstrates this behavior.
>>
>> Could you please give it a try to make sure that everything still works
>> as you expect?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Eshel
>
> I've taken this change around the block since yesterday and everything
> seems to be working exactly as I would expect it to.

Great, I'm therefore closing this bug.  

> I've also reviewed the cleanup that you did and tried to take some
> notes, especially on the commit message.

There was actually one more small issue that I now fixed in commit
5e3b94e1bec - in case completion-preview-insert-word would just move
word without leaving anything inserted, it would still record an
unwanted undo operation (that just inserts and deletes everything again,
basically a no-op).  Now we avoid recording anything in buffer-undo-list
if we're only moving point.

> Thanks again for all of the work that you put into creating this
> packaging in the first place, helping me through my change, and
> cleaning up the rough edges in the aftermath.

Thank you for this nice contribution!


Eshel




This bug report was last modified 1 year and 12 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.