GNU bug report logs - #71697
[PATCH] guix: lint: Honor 'no-archival?' package property.

Previous Next

Full log

Message #32 received at 71697 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: MSavoritias <email <at> msavoritias.me>
To: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Josselin Poiret <dev <at> jpoiret.xyz>,
 Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>,
 Matthew Trzcinski <matt <at> excalamus.com>, Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe <at> gnu.org>,
 Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>,
 Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me <at> tobias.gr>,
 Florian Pelz <pelzflorian <at> pelzflorian.de>, Ricardo Wurmus <rekado <at> elephly.net>,
 71697 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Christopher Baines <guix <at> cbaines.net>,
 MSavoritias <email <at> msavoritias.me>
Subject: Re: [bug#71697] [PATCH v2] guix: scripts: lint: Honor package
 property to exclude chercker.
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 11:21:51 +0300

On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 17:40:40 +0200
Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Sat, 22 Jun 2024 at 17:29, MSavoritias <email <at> msavoritias.me> wrote:
> 
> > Because as it currently stands this patch doesn't account for:
> > - people who dont have channels but run guix lint  
> 
> You misread: there is no channel involved.
> 
> Considering this patch, if an user does not want to run *any* checker
> for whatever reason, then this user has at hand two means:
> 
>  + guix lint --exclude
>  + rely on the ’properties’ field directly in package definition
> 
> 
> > - people who may not read the manual and have their code sent to SWH even tho they didnt intent it  
> 
> Considering this patch, all the checkers for each package are clearly
> displayed.
> 
> And this patch adds also the option ’--dry-run’.  Therefore, if one does
> not want to read the manual, that’s a good mitigation.
> 
> Cheers,
> simon


Ah okay. That sounds like a good first step then.

MSavoritias

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.