From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:43:06 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#7167: 23.2; w32-shell-execute doc Resent-From: Mirko Vukovic Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 16:09:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 7167 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 7167@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.128638133826764 (code B ref -1); Wed, 06 Oct 2010 16:09:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Oct 2010 16:08:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3WY6-0006xd-0y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:08:58 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3VEC-0006Oy-1i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:44:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P3VHF-0003B1-FC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:47:31 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:59872) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P3VH1-00036j-L6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:47:29 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47265 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P3VGl-0006gd-DN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:47:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P3VGe-00031G-Lf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:46:55 -0400 Received: from mail-yx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.213.169]:56937) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P3VGe-00030s-JB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:46:52 -0400 Received: by yxk8 with SMTP id 8so3699022yxk.0 for ; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 07:46:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=1E4UDc4BTcDIGALxJD2NEliqTeFKUx9Xdivzztn33wc=; b=EDQA84N260/jSQEcs9EymYS5U/TJ0V4VJCKVsWi3YF32ZGdSTBYYPxniBNU5OZg8k0 243ZMRs4olfvn45+bzJjL9q05O+KOxJiZulU5PZGEg1doNRkoxAldivMUqoFKkYTpFQI xpF/SgiUptMxDfohvZXfWqZ1col7QgG0tJ28Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=wwsggTlxCxGZm7Gfmq+I0DoL4n5rdmwnFftfJ/SqXLsPbfQJLPmKFcXdsSRPotFs+U Or4Oipg3h6a0dZ8WaVRzCbGc+QIWqhEk9Fe1tjF/OVwsbefSohMe4xMUS0UijH1yRg5Q jtikUBR+9YYAb7eOjv8Dbt62qdpJUMOa6RVpI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.50.1 with SMTP id c1mr1982476ybk.134.1286376411822; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 07:46:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.91.3 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 07:46:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 10:46:51 -0400 Message-ID: From: Mirko Vukovic Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:08:57 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) In `emacs -Q' When executing describe function (C-c f on) w32-shell-execute I get the following result: w32-shell-execute is a built-in function in `C source code'. [Missing arglist. Please make a bug report.] Not documented. [back] In GNU Emacs 23.2.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2010-05-08 on G41R2F1 Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600 configured using `configure --with-gcc (3.4) --no-opt --cflags -Ic:/xpm/include' Important settings: value of $LC_ALL: nil value of $LC_COLLATE: nil value of $LC_CTYPE: nil value of $LC_MESSAGES: nil value of $LC_MONETARY: nil value of $LC_NUMERIC: nil value of $LC_TIME: nil value of $LANG: ENU value of $XMODIFIERS: nil locale-coding-system: cp1252 default enable-multibyte-characters: t Major mode: Lisp Interaction Minor modes in effect: tooltip-mode: t mouse-wheel-mode: t tool-bar-mode: t menu-bar-mode: t file-name-shadow-mode: t global-font-lock-mode: t font-lock-mode: t blink-cursor-mode: t auto-encryption-mode: t auto-compression-mode: t line-number-mode: t transient-mark-mode: t Recent input: C-h f w 3 2 - s h e l l e Recent messages: For information about GNU Emacs and the GNU system, type C-h C-a. Making completion list... Type C-x 1 to delete the help window. Load-path shadows: e:/program-files/emacs-23.2/site-lisp/remember/remember hides e:/program-files/emacs-23.2/lisp/textmodes/remember Features: (shadow sort mail-extr message ecomplete rfc822 mml mml-sec password-cache mm-decode mm-bodies mm-encode mailcap mail-parse rfc2231 rfc2047 rfc2045 qp ietf-drums mailabbrev nnheader gnus-util netrc time-date mm-util mail-prsvr gmm-utils wid-edit mailheader canlock sha1 hex-util hashcash mail-utils emacsbug help-mode easymenu view help-fns tooltip ediff-hook vc-hooks lisp-float-type mwheel dos-w32 disp-table ls-lisp w32-win w32-vars tool-bar dnd fontset image fringe lisp-mode register page menu-bar rfn-eshadow timer select scroll-bar mldrag mouse jit-lock font-lock syntax facemenu font-core frame cham georgian utf-8-lang misc-lang vietnamese tibetan thai tai-viet lao korean japanese hebrew greek romanian slovak czech european ethiopic indian cyrillic chinese case-table epa-hook jka-cmpr-hook help simple abbrev loaddefs button minibuffer faces cus-face files text-properties overlay md5 base64 format env code-pages mule custom widget hashtable-print-readable backquote make-network-process multi-tty emacs) From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:43:06 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#7167: 23.2; w32-shell-execute doc Resent-From: Juanma Barranquero Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 18:26:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7167 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Mirko Vukovic Cc: 7167@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 7167-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7167.128638950630274 (code B ref 7167); Wed, 06 Oct 2010 18:26:02 +0000 Received: (at 7167) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Oct 2010 18:25:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3Yfp-0007sF-H4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 14:25:05 -0400 Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com ([209.85.214.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3Yfn-0007rq-NP for 7167@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 14:25:04 -0400 Received: by iwn10 with SMTP id 10so4152iwn.3 for <7167@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:28:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ino9y6fm2zTxGCPlp1GrCBizJPlRz+MGaDPnalvl2VE=; b=jS3Sj/oeqRTxlzLjdHLX9JsX69RuE2oA/N5/ROW42GQApz8AfiV5YIhi5A47TOw7X9 Ffk95YKUoc/z9rYfPAkXLRTgA4YlXsknMR3or0JvDJBoF+mj6XhVwbsFBviIFj8Zv18k Rx6S0Q2Lz5i67jMtdgcCubRSTPDdSmcYsK1fg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=wWM0HEpkxEU34jjc99jC0+kAbXDE+1Ip1+7YgXweFsJJrDwpFTWGDC/l4LubT3v+i6 3EXxSHTkTmQKVpeSr2u3Hl5TWn2QLfdn1/GU/AuONpVJgjABkdl85QbHJBbKGAkFw+We CSeGaGdGDwicFg6lV+6Pteil9BLI3JkTrmUD0= Received: by 10.231.31.196 with SMTP id z4mr14339633ibc.111.1286389694606; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:28:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.196.71 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 11:27:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 20:27:34 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 16:46, Mirko Vukovic wrote= : > w32-shell-execute is a built-in function in `C source code'. > > [Missing arglist. =C2=A0Please make a bug report.] > > Not documented. I cannot reproduce this (neither 23.1, 23.2 nor the branch for 23.3 or the trunk). Perhaps a problem with the binary distribution. Where did you get that Emacs binary? =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:43:06 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#7167: 23.2; w32-shell-execute doc Resent-From: Christoph Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 03:46:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7167 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Juanma Barranquero , mirko.vukovic@gmail.com Cc: 7167@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 7167-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7167.128642314011954 (code B ref 7167); Thu, 07 Oct 2010 03:46:02 +0000 Received: (at 7167) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2010 03:45:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3hQJ-00036l-FV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 23:45:39 -0400 Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com ([209.85.160.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3hQH-00036d-74 for 7167@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 23:45:38 -0400 Received: by gyh20 with SMTP id 20so2359gyh.3 for <7167@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 20:48:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zfduMFdtzgSuvL5ETRguToHUU5+tgFGRD0AnBU19kLI=; b=R0H61ImfWDDvm9BbPVFR7fdRjeVK6RCiA4SaAPjahpVENXn1xljHawddh27eQRfG5o CORhOEOGGfTwTxLQXubeRHHW80HcBKCSJyUeyFxzP4Nzq43HrgiaHwN54rN3DH/oSGFy aF3rDzqjd4PGls9O6dpcNOR5n9aIVfKJvVqC4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=A+6/wd3aTPkJANuxpDf39f5/m6Rv126Gx8CUsl06XVD1kCkg1goO60besMvPMVlS5a OGt9xCguxVGvB5nlhJNhhysM8tZ7NPODC0OjisZXfLas8AVvP2TjRE7k07jDHW2y/DQk RcyFhFQkAxZjGzpk34rirRALX070aJSjV8X08= Received: by 10.100.105.10 with SMTP id d10mr302616anc.4.1286422946578; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 20:42:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (71-208-139-99.hlrn.qwest.net [71.208.139.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b22sm932623anb.15.2010.10.06.20.42.24 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 06 Oct 2010 20:42:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CAD419F.3020305@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 21:42:23 -0600 From: Christoph User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On 10/6/2010 12:27 PM, Juanma Barranquero wrote: >> w32-shell-execute is a built-in function in `C source code'. >> >> [Missing arglist. Please make a bug report.] >> >> Not documented. > > I cannot reproduce this (neither 23.1, 23.2 nor the branch for 23.3 or > the trunk). It works OK in the current trunk (r101822), but I can definitely reproduce this in 23.2. Binary distribution from the official site running on Windows 7. See details below. In GNU Emacs 23.2.1 (i386-mingw-nt6.1.7600) of 2010-05-08 on G41R2F1 Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 6.1.7600 configured using `configure --with-gcc (3.4) --no-opt --cflags -Ic:/xpm/include' Important settings: value of $LC_ALL: nil value of $LC_COLLATE: nil value of $LC_CTYPE: nil value of $LC_MESSAGES: nil value of $LC_MONETARY: nil value of $LC_NUMERIC: nil value of $LC_TIME: nil value of $LANG: ENU value of $XMODIFIERS: nil locale-coding-system: cp1252 default enable-multibyte-characters: t Major mode: Lisp Interaction Minor modes in effect: tooltip-mode: t mouse-wheel-mode: t tool-bar-mode: t menu-bar-mode: t file-name-shadow-mode: t global-font-lock-mode: t font-lock-mode: t blink-cursor-mode: t auto-encryption-mode: t auto-compression-mode: t line-number-mode: t transient-mark-mode: t Recent input: M-x r e p o t - r t Recent messages: For information about GNU Emacs and the GNU system, type C-h C-a. Load-path shadows: None found. Features: (shadow sort mail-extr message ecomplete rfc822 mml easymenu mml-sec password-cache mm-decode mm-bodies mm-encode mailcap mail-parse rfc2231 rfc2047 rfc2045 qp ietf-drums mailabbrev nnheader gnus-util netrc time-date mm-util mail-prsvr gmm-utils wid-edit mailheader canlock sha1 hex-util hashcash mail-utils emacsbug tooltip ediff-hook vc-hooks lisp-float-type mwheel dos-w32 disp-table ls-lisp w32-win w32-vars tool-bar dnd fontset image fringe lisp-mode register page menu-bar rfn-eshadow timer select scroll-bar mldrag mouse jit-lock font-lock syntax facemenu font-core frame cham georgian utf-8-lang misc-lang vietnamese tibetan thai tai-viet lao korean japanese hebrew greek romanian slovak czech european ethiopic indian cyrillic chinese case-table epa-hook jka-cmpr-hook help simple abbrev loaddefs button minibuffer faces cus-face files text-properties overlay md5 base64 format env code-pages mule custom widget hashtable-print-readable backquote make-network-process multi-tty emacs) Christoph From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:43:06 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#7167: 23.2; w32-shell-execute doc Resent-From: Christoph Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 03:54:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7167 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Juanma Barranquero Cc: 7167@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 7167-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7167.128642363712168 (code B ref 7167); Thu, 07 Oct 2010 03:54:01 +0000 Received: (at 7167) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2010 03:53:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3hYK-0003AD-Vx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 23:53:57 -0400 Received: from mail-gw0-f44.google.com ([74.125.83.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3hYJ-0003A8-2W for 7167@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 23:53:55 -0400 Received: by gwb20 with SMTP id 20so119857gwb.3 for <7167@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 20:57:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OmVhwXzAiB/v7FHvM9VtnlxLqdGw1ewaSnbpyElvOME=; b=ASvcR5dbDzT9cwSAGOyrXnnYuUQl1FqMQltLJamKQKdrSlbjCRHt/P6bMxS3xefVI/ 0+I2w/70a+/gpWpRirLSrs6NrKX8Aife5B6LSojX9aKfJ+E3jZhm4OMyylOrCrIaioFN ttP8f379gFb5uKXM2gmWGP/o/eb2EngAcaC9Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=MQU88lnYXq3JWzzmnhWsPcemyuCirNj/5iafcc5y+0Z83bZz6jW+ahOo1TzzsYO0gB OThL/8zLMjPYz2bPG36mt+qNEPEu9rJGLIDmosa6UNA+/h90yW01jQkfBWZBbDmIrAia c9fjA32nCqe5PIbsV4F1xDbwwBQQ7bKAzC1gs= Received: by 10.100.213.4 with SMTP id l4mr315046ang.35.1286423827528; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 20:57:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (71-208-139-99.hlrn.qwest.net [71.208.139.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6sm422214anx.12.2010.10.06.20.57.05 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 06 Oct 2010 20:57:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CAD4510.4000702@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 21:57:04 -0600 From: Christoph User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4CAD419F.3020305@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4CAD419F.3020305@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) On 10/6/2010 9:42 PM, Christoph wrote: > It works OK in the current trunk (r101822), but I can definitely > reproduce this in 23.2. Binary distribution from the official site > running on Windows 7. See details below. Juanma, let me know if I can help troubleshoot this. Christoph From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:43:06 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#7167: 23.2; w32-shell-execute doc Resent-From: Juanma Barranquero Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7167 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Christoph Cc: Sean Sieger , 7167@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 7167-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7167.128644785022797 (code B ref 7167); Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:38:02 +0000 Received: (at 7167) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2010 10:37:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3nqr-0005vd-Nq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 06:37:29 -0400 Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com ([209.85.214.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3nqo-0005vX-Gi for 7167@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 06:37:26 -0400 Received: by iwn10 with SMTP id 10so735509iwn.3 for <7167@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 03:40:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ip1nMne/lmJLNjd2K/WuWpyMjYF5ECqS6lmq189Pd3M=; b=StIe2+V/u4YcrhF+4SrQ/youwVoRW21XLUt7xHHNqOBLDBGN6HfaPAKokcoxl7DlTy 9+7oruq6IN2NCZ1U9LxTXT1UextyCaN1RStsU2NjvklpMs0PGOsSZ5P05xbRsmTqiEKC Qd27AYOiKKRDLI93BXeirT/0WbD3JhJwmUW9o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=gCtqwtpKTXkSmwnHVZvS314EuUEbue+Ma6Sk0a3Y5Zgdlku2Uk8l+uop9QAZUT52Mp j8jbH/wWtEAnvPXx2Px9CPZP1NZuKVXwIbnOzBN4fdPXYQvi5DysRPSLb0eMK4k9obWE L1wcvtLXxZJSD2vb/vWebi83Oy6mn8CMBH+dA= Received: by 10.231.33.71 with SMTP id g7mr623437ibd.54.1286446595962; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 03:16:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.196.71 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 03:15:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4CAD4510.4000702@gmail.com> References: <4CAD419F.3020305@gmail.com> <4CAD4510.4000702@gmail.com> From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 12:15:55 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) [Sean, I've Cc:ed you because you're doing binary tarballs now] On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 05:57, Christoph wrote: > Juanma, let me know if I can help troubleshoot this. I think it is an issue with the binary distribution of Emacs 23.2 for Windows, not with 23.2 per se, because I have my own build of it and the problem is not present. Likely the fix will simply be to rebuild the official binary distribution of 23.2. =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:43:06 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#7167: 23.2; w32-shell-execute doc Resent-From: Lennart Borgman Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:42:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7167 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Juanma Barranquero Cc: Christoph , Sean Sieger , 7167@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 7167-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7167.128644808222924 (code B ref 7167); Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:42:02 +0000 Received: (at 7167) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2010 10:41:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3nub-0005xh-UK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 06:41:22 -0400 Received: from mail-qw0-f44.google.com ([209.85.216.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3nua-0005xb-E6 for 7167@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 06:41:20 -0400 Received: by qwc9 with SMTP id 9so250676qwc.3 for <7167@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 03:44:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=YaTRgVGrQ82/Z5Tu7H2SPZp+a6itZdHddZkJeUxYjlg=; b=iyA3DYnXjXqpmCMdueUlxn1JfjVvvtlR3yvIuoH8LZIvFWo+sglHP3CxfWLWP9NmAV QPWFxmzYjbamk+2OxMwm7lmjke6w2DUr8NpuE4rHHz3M0Uz8poV1i05jlQ8IMkbrmQeq 8mP9aoBUUB0kjSmpJ9w1lIix1d1yyJ7Mpn1rk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=SkdEOC1pAGsmqKgrUzLhttJM774sFN4Zfklcyp0T6pg5WD6UFKwLfUMSQvLGmUBqK9 1mqt0asM1kZO/VI16Z1wqcdEwqDHlnXz3eVS6X/HLcTQWU2jab9alU5KKYmSjnUhqNwl +XlQGTaBLpSGhj/ayHGu/uRVT1tvPsiK/97qA= Received: by 10.224.180.144 with SMTP id bu16mr150285qab.171.1286448273879; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 03:44:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.220.195 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 03:44:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4CAD419F.3020305@gmail.com> <4CAD4510.4000702@gmail.com> From: Lennart Borgman Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 12:44:13 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Juanma Barranquero wrote: > [Sean, I've Cc:ed you because you're doing binary tarballs now] > > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 05:57, Christoph wrote: > >> Juanma, let me know if I can help troubleshoot this. > > I think it is an issue with the binary distribution of Emacs 23.2 for > Windows, not with 23.2 per se, because I have my own build of it and > the problem is not present. > > Likely the fix will simply be to rebuild the official binary > distribution of 23.2. Then something must be broken in the official binary distribution. Maybe it would be good to know what? Or maybe it is just not worth the trouble? Anyway should not new binaries with a new version number (say 23.2.1) be uploaded then? From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:43:06 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#7167: 23.2; w32-shell-execute doc Resent-From: Juanma Barranquero Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7167 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Lennart Borgman Cc: Christoph , Sean Sieger , 7167@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 7167-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7167.128644826323013 (code B ref 7167); Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:45:02 +0000 Received: (at 7167) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2010 10:44:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3nxX-0005z8-82 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 06:44:23 -0400 Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com ([209.85.214.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3nxW-0005z1-19 for 7167@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 06:44:22 -0400 Received: by iwn10 with SMTP id 10so742133iwn.3 for <7167@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 03:47:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=p1JPlRwPObZfUYq7SZ8iREL7ssdA5aZ1s5VU59fH4H8=; b=jumtaRLoEY2Rr7XVYH16orhO0DYJiNdbr/BVSFyPHWpqtppP/mvX4A2ZRbIzYy2YJ0 /weu0FY6G434k6XdoXPuF5zE3E/TCxOGVekFef/PgS11MlEJWZaVPLmThoG+s25ARaRR /0gnNrXd089dQprTcomgt86tYccbH15UIH85Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=m+4fiiRyjRx2xZtBRwI2r7WeIn/gLixFZd169cSn2zl9RrMDy6JoEt9m+pLP9uRjBh 7lJIflsdczYxS4pxhSIlC8CAdDVhb0sylZKsVS51jecfqbdXulqa6LiUpyFHuvH5gVT4 EYGxMUC+/ujyrK3j36+cDuHFRcPL21Si4JC3g= Received: by 10.231.146.135 with SMTP id h7mr629976ibv.149.1286448455359; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 03:47:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.196.71 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 03:46:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4CAD419F.3020305@gmail.com> <4CAD4510.4000702@gmail.com> From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 12:46:55 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 12:44, Lennart Borgman w= rote: > Then something must be broken in the official binary distribution. Isn't that what I said? > Maybe it would be good to know what? Or maybe it is just not worth the > trouble? Not worth the trouble, I think. > Anyway should not new binaries with a new version number (say 23.2.1) > be uploaded then? Perhaps, but that's up to Jason and Sean, I think, because they are the ones taking care of the binary tarballs. =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:43:06 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#7167: 23.2; w32-shell-execute doc Resent-From: Lennart Borgman Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:48:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7167 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Juanma Barranquero Cc: Christoph , Sean Sieger , 7167@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 7167-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7167.128644847023121 (code B ref 7167); Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:48:02 +0000 Received: (at 7167) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2010 10:47:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3o0r-00060s-Qu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 06:47:50 -0400 Received: from mail-qy0-f172.google.com ([209.85.216.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3o0p-00060m-Kw for 7167@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 06:47:48 -0400 Received: by qyk2 with SMTP id 2so16258qyk.3 for <7167@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 03:51:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=e0UQSOdrg58/dAqiTxF/yixCkatHTAP4pUaiPA2x2hg=; b=Pb1hvIyaxmbYF+zM0bwI81jMVtkvf2m1t7Xi7QL1qtudAsNAnaWcyHYa0HopYwmW8l rHUYGuyzvA98pBxdD4W9hMgMHxQzJE6n47yYDk09n9BA83UeDRfO2zp8yoHq6Vwp1dRQ GolydzSG7SlyT2hJ2IKtJwH5QMMeO+zv5kILU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=Q+Qa1X8g2j+h+6CfKUQbikVAf5CUzrnJ9K/Aa5V1CwAC1L7iBh/wwBpGPeRtWkgCd4 ofvPsmOON2KfCM0jCzJIR9AJFCmLm5QaqWSXSp8y06HrLx5v+dozp7t0OADj8Uqjy9uM A2iT/uswhagGBkl+FCroQyAmMmNsXTKxc8VvA= Received: by 10.229.236.8 with SMTP id ki8mr615109qcb.102.1286448660866; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 03:51:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.220.195 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 03:50:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4CAD419F.3020305@gmail.com> <4CAD4510.4000702@gmail.com> From: Lennart Borgman Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 12:50:40 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Juanma Barranquero wrote: > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 12:44, Lennart Borgman wrote: > >> Then something must be broken in the official binary distribution. > > Isn't that what I said? ;-) >> Maybe it would be good to know what? Or maybe it is just not worth the >> trouble? > > Not worth the trouble, I think. > >> Anyway should not new binaries with a new version number (say 23.2.1) >> be uploaded then? > > Perhaps, but that's up to Jason and Sean, I think, because they are > the ones taking care of the binary tarballs. Isn't it more general than that? Must we not make it clear that unfortunately something went wrong with the upload of 23.2 and therefore we make a new upload 23.2.1? At least I think that would help the users. From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:43:06 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#7167: 23.2; w32-shell-execute doc Resent-From: Juanma Barranquero Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:55:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7167 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Lennart Borgman Cc: Christoph , Sean Sieger , 7167@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 7167-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7167.128644885223332 (code B ref 7167); Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:55:01 +0000 Received: (at 7167) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2010 10:54:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3o71-00064H-Uz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 06:54:12 -0400 Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com ([209.85.214.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3o6l-00063u-MF for 7167@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 06:54:10 -0400 Received: by iwn10 with SMTP id 10so751038iwn.3 for <7167@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 03:57:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0jtt2poLw+FakZz8oozQOgyKC/MrCWgxwXWjEnhvmFI=; b=Dv3O4IbEa4eayWYi2raYdjH/1MYuW4lnabSnGmY7bIqiMt6AiHybb4bDZ8IGM64eJO nD4u7PbGNTD+hPWQybHJCExk/xjSxedgNC9i4T6ZMafLsQuWIjE3EZteG7Q9etk4UnOd M+bmskq8f8+o3FGCpMPzFPtdm+v0ms3zgLOys= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ZU8qCLTa8MCl405DlN8RDetPYhT+mPml66mjjvT9Gm3KCZ/WxvuKRa/MjYegZL0Sp0 QhBrJDNnocskHuHmca4FDxO2cTRx+fm57YmrnkbJ6Na+sScnXwIZeipwJ58fA39bmrPw +a96lHhLrf1wPM4XNXDZuDgKdbe1pXwzfaUZw= Received: by 10.231.170.208 with SMTP id e16mr673863ibz.44.1286449027212; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 03:57:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.196.71 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 03:56:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4CAD419F.3020305@gmail.com> <4CAD4510.4000702@gmail.com> From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 12:56:26 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 12:50, Lennart Borgman w= rote: > Isn't it more general than that? Must we not make it clear that > unfortunately something went wrong with the upload of 23.2 and > therefore we make a new upload 23.2.1? At least I think that would > help the users. So far, the only trouble is that one specific function is lacking its docstring. Hardly earthshaking. Releasing a new 23.2 could be confusing, specially if 23.3 pretest is about to start (Chong said). =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:43:06 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#7167: 23.2; w32-shell-execute doc Resent-From: Lennart Borgman Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 11:52:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7167 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Juanma Barranquero Cc: Christoph , Sean Sieger , 7167@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 7167-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7167.128645227427420 (code B ref 7167); Thu, 07 Oct 2010 11:52:01 +0000 Received: (at 7167) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2010 11:51:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3p0E-00078D-G6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 07:51:14 -0400 Received: from mail-qy0-f172.google.com ([209.85.216.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3p0C-000788-SQ for 7167@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 07:51:13 -0400 Received: by qyk1 with SMTP id 1so16518qyk.3 for <7167@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 04:54:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=e4AOmouHhJOWa0Q9vRxeRXlYMOvzN2A41FXJsiDldDE=; b=jp3WtVNwkX3DfKP0byW00zmM9X/Zo/f6CDaWSy7YA4hAUkdEgixGCrWmnTX4ZSAsrM 6YLSgqsTyS6HlHB0vh3BHUFooE3ef30h47ci0N+wD0uF9t/3bwvLFRt82RRtRYn5xcmb 52ys+MGLX6mCl9MWEzyI7uxEyN5d7E3IQMheU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=nRmkvwGiLccbnuT+9CO8g1zwqzDi3fkTx5T9gwMspVVshBZf0Ul5/jw+Tbjz/rrWrI k4jZLt3f9P84RHHgkv8Ztb1jz9aeI/Cnif1QYMW2CqgKr6lcX54J3tfN8DG3FeoosSt0 uk255NGUfm5u4l1GqYi5rY4KzdEujn44j48fo= Received: by 10.224.179.75 with SMTP id bp11mr211516qab.204.1286452466240; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 04:54:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.220.195 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 04:53:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4CAD419F.3020305@gmail.com> <4CAD4510.4000702@gmail.com> From: Lennart Borgman Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 13:53:48 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Juanma Barranquero wrote: > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 12:50, Lennart Borgman wrote: > >> Isn't it more general than that? Must we not make it clear that >> unfortunately something went wrong with the upload of 23.2 and >> therefore we make a new upload 23.2.1? At least I think that would >> help the users. > > So far, the only trouble is that one specific function is lacking its > docstring. Hardly earthshaking. It does not really matter to me, but can you ask yourself how you are thinking here? > Releasing a new 23.2 could be confusing, specially if 23.3 pretest is > about to start (Chong said). Yes, maybe. However the trouble could be worse so the possibility for this must be made explicit IMO. From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:43:06 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#7167: 23.2; w32-shell-execute doc Resent-From: Juanma Barranquero Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 12:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7167 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Lennart Borgman Cc: Christoph , Sean Sieger , 7167@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 7167-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7167.128645283527704 (code B ref 7167); Thu, 07 Oct 2010 12:01:02 +0000 Received: (at 7167) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2010 12:00:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3p9H-0007Cn-0c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 08:00:35 -0400 Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com ([209.85.214.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3p9E-0007Ci-TN for 7167@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 08:00:33 -0400 Received: by iwn10 with SMTP id 10so811629iwn.3 for <7167@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 05:03:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=MM9ZokydYWDjOCHgfdu2jXwj61Qgt/Ek/gnJJc3ASoE=; b=nT67DV6+7gw/2Qc0cp7AqvMm1wmlZx8bMlkrJTjglOn/4ZeDsFaIgR9UXQHcqTNLHe FmHkxaM8zg0LLzyK73mZ/RqPhh1NgZoWxsS2sZJQgakM56r4RSLlKgWRx4e8dx6BuIw4 Vl3n1MkI0tDTjWWBBwOlgQzx12yovO+L/m3dw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=JrV0pDKc/9+IjBG5R3JGWPDOMjkL5Al9XJFQ0SdLH/1lyb2/uEl1JXybZuhRUqzqkP OyxpR1c+vyY0otJvAHjKcwj2aMwtN9DC92UAct4V9Hizpm4nbgQC25DZF2UTPK1pH4ZR s6WWrBJFGjPtxDoN8sLhmaNV+btsMccaewYWI= Received: by 10.231.172.205 with SMTP id m13mr752993ibz.35.1286453026055; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 05:03:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.196.71 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 05:03:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4CAD419F.3020305@gmail.com> <4CAD4510.4000702@gmail.com> From: Juanma Barranquero Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 14:03:05 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--) On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 13:53, Lennart Borgman w= rote: > It does not really matter to me, but can you ask yourself how you are > thinking here? What are you suggesting? Be clear. > Yes, maybe. However the trouble could be worse so the possibility for > this must be made explicit IMO. Again: explain yourself if you want to be understood. =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Juanma From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:43:06 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#7167: 23.2; w32-shell-execute doc Resent-From: Jason Rumney Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 14:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7167 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Juanma Barranquero Cc: Christoph , Sean Sieger , 7167@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 7167-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7167.128646091131486 (code B ref 7167); Thu, 07 Oct 2010 14:16:02 +0000 Received: (at 7167) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2010 14:15:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3rFX-0008Bn-J0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:15:11 -0400 Received: from mail-px0-f172.google.com ([209.85.212.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3rFV-0008Bi-Ri for 7167@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:15:10 -0400 Received: by pxi6 with SMTP id 6so142726pxi.3 for <7167@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 07:18:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:received:from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; bh=YCtw7wPcxUmLcYRvbn8dK3zYTVaRCoxSJEXJDtq9gGs=; b=R3ngkyyrJdyvyjcR4zpMkZJUhe0iMjqp5cbANJnDqE3WVmEko9lpOOuIMerdfclc/X LBCW1GDqCbuqvDu+5YlBObGRqrmVTw/dErJZJKGhBoN75oHgatwsdpcJ95fbLSAyig8P y4kaVTehBeT8CF0h1ytLdSXkVFAThO+GVajL8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=cnTNa1mAvoQlTuJADcpQuamf3vbAOhOibt3VmdDmMnApnGnm3j7lIa3gzrOj39fcHb mRAGNTqIYoNDDGWShkA+lyLeaitfbJlatOF4Sue4ZM6SqNCYzJki3dQnwqCpuND3Z9aL l2JG7dkRWTmGw5mmguphT0RF0pJ1stQwBZz7g= Received: by 10.142.246.10 with SMTP id t10mr651694wfh.99.1286461099330; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 07:18:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from home.jasonrumney.net ([202.87.221.130]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z23sm2383142wfd.3.2010.10.07.07.18.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 07 Oct 2010 07:18:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by home.jasonrumney.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 19D54A76; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 22:18:13 +0800 (MYT) From: Jason Rumney References: <4CAD419F.3020305@gmail.com> <4CAD4510.4000702@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 22:18:12 +0800 In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Thu, 7 Oct 2010 12:15:55 +0200") Message-ID: <87aamq3x3v.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) Juanma Barranquero writes: > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 05:57, Christoph wrote: > >> Juanma, let me know if I can help troubleshoot this. > > I think it is an issue with the binary distribution of Emacs 23.2 for > Windows, not with 23.2 per se, because I have my own build of it and > the problem is not present. > > Likely the fix will simply be to rebuild the official binary > distribution of 23.2. It sounds like the problem could be a stale DOC file. Sean, did you run make install after building, or did you just copy the exe files into the bin directory by hand? When I built the binaries, I always started from a fresh directory, and used make install to ensure everything was in place. It could also be caused by the recent changes to the install and packaging targets for Windows failing to copy or package all the required files. I'm not sure if those changes went into the Emacs 23 branch, if so then they may need checking. From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:43:06 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#7167: 23.2; w32-shell-execute doc References: In-Reply-To: Resent-From: Esa Peuha Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 14:58:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7167 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Juanma Barranquero Cc: 7167@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 7167-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7167.128646347232676 (code B ref 7167); Thu, 07 Oct 2010 14:58:01 +0000 Received: (at 7167) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2010 14:57:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3rup-0008Uz-Uy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:57:52 -0400 Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com ([74.125.82.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3ruo-0008Ur-Hn for 7167@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:57:50 -0400 Received: by wyi11 with SMTP id 11so131400wyi.3 for <7167@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 08:01:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=U2qu3zO7MCPtJpt6d97q9uZXCS7o9Ru4nXblPSoK9bM=; b=h7iQYef/QOnvqgU2Xcz67g8NqZ/cTkaM81ZL9VxsTNiv9N/SBVSoVcMKJFGOycf9dU KNBhx4ANIOZb2uU2/VvF4ULrfl2k6mGcIvKEBocWwupdcc8Zxhqof0YdcDPCeKBYwXWB dJDf680GDq8BnQE/M/0G+i9SXAK4UsWqoiZjQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=uK96S2O1HMwBms3PHhywodeK8T9HB3YvL9CjW09pBlqR3pZSvCN6Z0XQJGsidKRGaW hSZ2Gd7mNGCqdwtlcDeZF9gJFz/TIFdc4yUu1Ym62qZQQyQERDFTP1McpYBmObiN1LeQ TsmwYDCIOF6RWf40hfrUAfhJv7/BTbR7QPx7A= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.23.4 with SMTP id u4mr836272weu.96.1286463664060; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 08:01:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.10.146 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 08:01:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 18:01:04 +0300 Message-ID: From: Esa Peuha Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Score: -3.9 (---) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.8 (---) > So far, the only trouble is that one specific function is lacking its docstring. It's a little more serious than that: all lisp functions defined in every w32*.c file, except for those with names beginning with x, are missing their docstrings. I didn't check functions from other files, so some of their docstrings may be missing as well. From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:43:06 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#7167: 23.2; w32-shell-execute doc Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 18:10:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7167 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Juanma Barranquero Cc: cschol2112@googlemail.com, sean.sieger@gmail.com, 7167@debbugs.gnu.org Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Received: via spool by 7167-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7167.12864749976506 (code B ref 7167); Thu, 07 Oct 2010 18:10:03 +0000 Received: (at 7167) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2010 18:09:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3uui-0001gt-W5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 14:09:57 -0400 Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3uug-0001go-IA for 7167@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 14:09:55 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L9X00300MHNHE00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 7167@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 20:12:48 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.148.82]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L9X003E7MLAGL10@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 20:12:48 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 20:12:47 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il Message-id: <83pqvloork.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4CAD419F.3020305@gmail.com> <4CAD4510.4000702@gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 12:15:55 +0200 > Cc: Sean Sieger , 7167@debbugs.gnu.org > > [Sean, I've Cc:ed you because you're doing binary tarballs now] > > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 05:57, Christoph wrote: > > > Juanma, let me know if I can help troubleshoot this. > > I think it is an issue with the binary distribution of Emacs 23.2 for > Windows, not with 23.2 per se, because I have my own build of it and > the problem is not present. > > Likely the fix will simply be to rebuild the official binary > distribution of 23.2. Not sure, because my binary, which I built myself, also has this problem. Will try to investigate tomorrow. From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:43:06 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#7167: 23.2; w32-shell-execute doc Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 18:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7167 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Jason Rumney Cc: cschol2112@googlemail.com, lekktu@gmail.com, sean.sieger@gmail.com, 7167@debbugs.gnu.org Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Received: via spool by 7167-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7167.12864754166806 (code B ref 7167); Thu, 07 Oct 2010 18:17:01 +0000 Received: (at 7167) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2010 18:16:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3v1U-0001lj-4n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 14:16:56 -0400 Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3v1R-0001la-U1 for 7167@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 14:16:55 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L9X00700MWSOR00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 7167@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 20:19:58 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.148.82]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L9X007WNMX8O410@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 20:19:58 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 20:19:56 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: <87aamq3x3v.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il Message-id: <83ocb5oofn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4CAD419F.3020305@gmail.com> <4CAD4510.4000702@gmail.com> <87aamq3x3v.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) > From: Jason Rumney > Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 22:18:12 +0800 > Cc: Christoph , Sean Sieger , > 7167@debbugs.gnu.org > > It sounds like the problem could be a stale DOC file. Sean, did you run > make install after building, or did you just copy the exe files into the > bin directory by hand? This is unlikely to be the problem: my binary was built in a fresh directory and "make install"ed, and it also doesn't have this function documented. From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:43:06 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#7167: 23.2; w32-shell-execute doc In-Reply-To: Resent-From: Sean Sieger Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 21:05:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7167 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.128648549011421 (code B ref -1); Thu, 07 Oct 2010 21:05:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2010 21:04:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3xdy-0002yA-BK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 17:04:50 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3xdv-0002y3-Li for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 17:04:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P3xgw-0003DQ-Po for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 17:08:02 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:39555) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P3xgw-0003DK-Nm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 17:07:54 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36407 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P3xgq-0005sF-UK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 17:07:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P3xUa-0007xQ-8Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 16:55:09 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:33725) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P3xUa-0007x6-34 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 16:55:08 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3xUW-0004mD-H1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 22:55:04 +0200 Received: from pool-141-155-18-143.ny325.east.verizon.net ([141.155.18.143]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 22:55:04 +0200 Received: from sean.sieger by pool-141-155-18-143.ny325.east.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 22:55:04 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ From: Sean Sieger Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 16:53:03 -0400 Lines: 4 Message-ID: <87aampendc.fsf@gmail.com> References: <4CAD419F.3020305@gmail.com> <4CAD4510.4000702@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-141-155-18-143.ny325.east.verizon.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:BhF2zZofdcH7dtZJ0EmpSbvlQ84= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) Likely the fix will simply be to rebuild the official binary distribution of 23.2. So, is this worth a try? From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:43:06 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#7167: 23.2; w32-shell-execute doc In-Reply-To: Resent-From: Sean Sieger Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 21:06:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7167 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.128648551911456 (code B ref -1); Thu, 07 Oct 2010 21:06:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2010 21:05:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3xeR-0002yj-JF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 17:05:19 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3xeQ-0002ye-Cg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 17:05:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P3xhX-0003Qs-Mf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 17:08:33 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:40297) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P3xhX-0003Qm-Kg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 17:08:31 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36602 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P3xhR-0005wh-Cw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 17:08:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P3xQJ-0007AR-S2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 16:50:44 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:41955) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P3xQJ-00079Z-MP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 16:50:43 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3xQE-0003Yk-RG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 22:50:38 +0200 Received: from pool-141-155-18-143.ny325.east.verizon.net ([141.155.18.143]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 22:50:38 +0200 Received: from sean.sieger by pool-141-155-18-143.ny325.east.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 22:50:38 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ From: Sean Sieger Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 16:50:38 -0400 Lines: 19 Message-ID: <87eic1enhd.fsf@gmail.com> References: <4CAD419F.3020305@gmail.com> <4CAD4510.4000702@gmail.com> <87aamq3x3v.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-141-155-18-143.ny325.east.verizon.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:8/G9S02zHQYY6+Pe3fksGMdJO94= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) Jason Rumney writes: It sounds like the problem could be a stale DOC file. Sean, did you run make install after building, or did you just copy the exe files into the bin directory by hand? I ran make install. When I built the binaries, I always started from a fresh directory, and used make install to ensure everything was in place. While I don't delete /bin, I don't alter the course of make install. It could also be caused by the recent changes to the install and packaging targets for Windows failing to copy or package all the required files. I'm not sure if those changes went into the Emacs 23 branch, if so then they may need checking. I think post 23.2. From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:43:06 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Mirko Vukovic Subject: bug#7167: closed (Re: bug#7167: 23.2; w32-shell-execute doc) Message-ID: References: <83eic1nh8w.fsf@gnu.org> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 7167 X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs,w32 Reply-To: 7167@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 09:51:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1286531462-493-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1286531462-493-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #7167: 23.2; w32-shell-execute doc which was filed against the emacs,w32 package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 7167@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 7167: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D7167 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1286531462-493-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 7167-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Oct 2010 09:50:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P49aW-00007j-AI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 05:50:04 -0400 Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P49aS-00007K-Pw for 7167-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 05:50:02 -0400 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L9Y00K00U3DSM00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 7167-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 11:52:49 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.148.82]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L9Y00KPDU3YE7E0@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 11:52:48 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 11:52:47 +0200 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#7167: 23.2; w32-shell-execute doc In-reply-to: <83pqvloork.fsf@gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83eic1nh8w.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4CAD419F.3020305@gmail.com> <4CAD4510.4000702@gmail.com> <83pqvloork.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 7167-done Cc: cschol2112@googlemail.com, lekktu@gmail.com, sean.sieger@gmail.com, 7167-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) > Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 20:12:47 +0200 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: cschol2112@googlemail.com, sean.sieger@gmail.com, 7167@debbugs.gnu.org > > > From: Juanma Barranquero > > Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 12:15:55 +0200 > > Cc: Sean Sieger , 7167@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > [Sean, I've Cc:ed you because you're doing binary tarballs now] > > > > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 05:57, Christoph wrote: > > > > > Juanma, let me know if I can help troubleshoot this. > > > > I think it is an issue with the binary distribution of Emacs 23.2 for > > Windows, not with 23.2 per se, because I have my own build of it and > > the problem is not present. > > > > Likely the fix will simply be to rebuild the official binary > > distribution of 23.2. > > Not sure, because my binary, which I built myself, also has this > problem. > > Will try to investigate tomorrow. Found the problem. There's nothing wrong with the Windows build system per se. The problem is that emacs-23.2 tarball comes with a src/buildobj.h from a Unix system where it was tarred, which is baaaaad, and not only on Windows. This causes Make not to create src/buildobj.h as suitable for the actual build on the target platform, and the rest is history. I've just installed a fix in the emacs-23 branch (revno 100091 and a followup change in 100092) to exclude this file from the tarball. To fix this locally, just remove src/buildobj.h and rebuild Emacs. While at that, I would suggest that this code in help-fns.el: (let ((file (catch 'loop (while t (let ((pnt (search-forward (concat "" name "\n")))) (re-search-backward "S\\(.*\\)") (let ((file (match-string 1))) (if (member file build-files) (throw 'loop file) (goto-char pnt)))))))) (if (string-match "^ns.*\\(\\.o\\|obj\\)\\'" file) (setq file (replace-match ".m" t t file 1)) (if (string-match "\\.\\(o\\|obj\\)\\'" file) (setq file (replace-match ".c" t t file)))) (if (string-match "\\.\\(c\\|m\\)\\'" file) (concat "src/" file) file))))) be made smarter wrt the error message it displays when the function or variable it looks for is found in etc/DOC, but the file in which it is defined is not in build-files. (This happens when you click or type RET on the link to the source file where the function is defined.) Currently, the error message, which comes from search-forward, is quite cryptic for a naive user: Search failed: "^_Fw32-shell-execute " It should at least mention the fact that the problem could be with build-files, or, better, say that w32-shell-execute's definition is in a file that is not in build-files. Volunteers are welcome to make this improvement. ------------=_1286531462-493-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Oct 2010 16:08:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3WY6-0006xd-0y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:08:58 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3VEC-0006Oy-1i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:44:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P3VHF-0003B1-FC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:47:31 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:59872) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P3VH1-00036j-L6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:47:29 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47265 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P3VGl-0006gd-DN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:47:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P3VGe-00031G-Lf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:46:55 -0400 Received: from mail-yx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.213.169]:56937) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P3VGe-00030s-JB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:46:52 -0400 Received: by yxk8 with SMTP id 8so3699022yxk.0 for ; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 07:46:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=1E4UDc4BTcDIGALxJD2NEliqTeFKUx9Xdivzztn33wc=; b=EDQA84N260/jSQEcs9EymYS5U/TJ0V4VJCKVsWi3YF32ZGdSTBYYPxniBNU5OZg8k0 243ZMRs4olfvn45+bzJjL9q05O+KOxJiZulU5PZGEg1doNRkoxAldivMUqoFKkYTpFQI xpF/SgiUptMxDfohvZXfWqZ1col7QgG0tJ28Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=wwsggTlxCxGZm7Gfmq+I0DoL4n5rdmwnFftfJ/SqXLsPbfQJLPmKFcXdsSRPotFs+U Or4Oipg3h6a0dZ8WaVRzCbGc+QIWqhEk9Fe1tjF/OVwsbefSohMe4xMUS0UijH1yRg5Q jtikUBR+9YYAb7eOjv8Dbt62qdpJUMOa6RVpI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.50.1 with SMTP id c1mr1982476ybk.134.1286376411822; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 07:46:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.91.3 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 07:46:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 10:46:51 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: 23.2; w32-shell-execute doc From: Mirko Vukovic To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 12:08:57 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) In `emacs -Q' When executing describe function (C-c f on) w32-shell-execute I get the following result: w32-shell-execute is a built-in function in `C source code'. [Missing arglist. Please make a bug report.] Not documented. [back] In GNU Emacs 23.2.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2010-05-08 on G41R2F1 Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600 configured using `configure --with-gcc (3.4) --no-opt --cflags -Ic:/xpm/include' Important settings: value of $LC_ALL: nil value of $LC_COLLATE: nil value of $LC_CTYPE: nil value of $LC_MESSAGES: nil value of $LC_MONETARY: nil value of $LC_NUMERIC: nil value of $LC_TIME: nil value of $LANG: ENU value of $XMODIFIERS: nil locale-coding-system: cp1252 default enable-multibyte-characters: t Major mode: Lisp Interaction Minor modes in effect: tooltip-mode: t mouse-wheel-mode: t tool-bar-mode: t menu-bar-mode: t file-name-shadow-mode: t global-font-lock-mode: t font-lock-mode: t blink-cursor-mode: t auto-encryption-mode: t auto-compression-mode: t line-number-mode: t transient-mark-mode: t Recent input: C-h f w 3 2 - s h e l l e Recent messages: For information about GNU Emacs and the GNU system, type C-h C-a. Making completion list... Type C-x 1 to delete the help window. Load-path shadows: e:/program-files/emacs-23.2/site-lisp/remember/remember hides e:/program-files/emacs-23.2/lisp/textmodes/remember Features: (shadow sort mail-extr message ecomplete rfc822 mml mml-sec password-cache mm-decode mm-bodies mm-encode mailcap mail-parse rfc2231 rfc2047 rfc2045 qp ietf-drums mailabbrev nnheader gnus-util netrc time-date mm-util mail-prsvr gmm-utils wid-edit mailheader canlock sha1 hex-util hashcash mail-utils emacsbug help-mode easymenu view help-fns tooltip ediff-hook vc-hooks lisp-float-type mwheel dos-w32 disp-table ls-lisp w32-win w32-vars tool-bar dnd fontset image fringe lisp-mode register page menu-bar rfn-eshadow timer select scroll-bar mldrag mouse jit-lock font-lock syntax facemenu font-core frame cham georgian utf-8-lang misc-lang vietnamese tibetan thai tai-viet lao korean japanese hebrew greek romanian slovak czech european ethiopic indian cyrillic chinese case-table epa-hook jka-cmpr-hook help simple abbrev loaddefs button minibuffer faces cus-face files text-properties overlay md5 base64 format env code-pages mule custom widget hashtable-print-readable backquote make-network-process multi-tty emacs) ------------=_1286531462-493-1-- From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:43:06 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#7167: 23.2; w32-shell-execute doc Resent-From: Lennart Borgman Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 10:32:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7167 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii , 7167@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: cschol2112@googlemail.com, lekktu@gmail.com, sean.sieger@gmail.com, 7167-done@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 7167-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7167.12865338951685 (code B ref 7167); Fri, 08 Oct 2010 10:32:02 +0000 Received: (at 7167) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Oct 2010 10:31:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P4AEg-0000R7-Vc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 06:31:35 -0400 Received: from mail-qy0-f172.google.com ([209.85.216.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P4AEe-0000Qz-8y; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 06:31:32 -0400 Received: by qyk2 with SMTP id 2so444451qyk.3 for ; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 03:34:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=66qgmLfwU3cK6eK17TD6nB9AimiGYNZ7SY0IvpJsf+g=; b=Xb6hq6+DX13QRloAbp8Nw5VALo0xqQeTuCGUKRQlnX1FEqCJPR/OmyJAhvjrSWHt1l odszKl0SNL1CB0NL1l3gY6lIZtfzPgz5HeSHFT6TLZrhUts3JTPlossYvuyu8ti4XVZ0 37GzDOmPihOxgsfQF8U4FwFkKjy45ru9Xl2+0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=s6eULUbT/yPA2BXlvXqeyp4RIIXrMPXT1ilKqpQlZeKRRuEPBDCX3z/GmjptCZl5dN NW/X25GHWhvwiM79Z3Zza9+6fX9DyCmM/x4gRAxC+IYr3lJHvehuGtoNL83fNJ+LNYir XOtMwd2o/74BxcWLlfJkidFT4AWWxySxKCuHo= Received: by 10.224.174.136 with SMTP id t8mr1387909qaz.298.1286534088279; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 03:34:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.220.195 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Oct 2010 03:34:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83eic1nh8w.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4CAD419F.3020305@gmail.com> <4CAD4510.4000702@gmail.com> <83pqvloork.fsf@gnu.org> <83eic1nh8w.fsf@gnu.org> From: Lennart Borgman Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 12:34:27 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 20:12:47 +0200 >> From: Eli Zaretskii >> Cc: cschol2112@googlemail.com, sean.sieger@gmail.com, 7167@debbugs.gnu.o= rg >> >> > From: Juanma Barranquero >> > Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 12:15:55 +0200 >> > Cc: Sean Sieger , 7167@debbugs.gnu.org >> > >> > [Sean, I've Cc:ed you because you're doing binary tarballs now] >> > >> > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 05:57, Christoph wr= ote: >> > >> > > Juanma, let me know if I can help troubleshoot this. >> > >> > I think it is an issue with the binary distribution of Emacs 23.2 for >> > Windows, not with 23.2 per se, because I have my own build of it and >> > the problem is not present. >> > >> > Likely the fix will simply be to rebuild the official binary >> > distribution of 23.2. >> >> Not sure, because my binary, which I built myself, also has this >> problem. >> >> Will try to investigate tomorrow. > > Found the problem. =C2=A0There's nothing wrong with the Windows build > system per se. =C2=A0The problem is that emacs-23.2 tarball comes with a > src/buildobj.h from a Unix system where it was tarred, which is > baaaaad, and not only on Windows. =C2=A0This causes Make not to create > src/buildobj.h as suitable for the actual build on the target > platform, and the rest is history. Very good. What impact can this have other than what we know now? From unknown Sat Aug 16 18:43:06 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#7167: 23.2; w32-shell-execute doc Resent-From: Ken Brown Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 15:06:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7167 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 7167@debbugs.gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org Received: via spool by 7167-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7167.128655030712667 (code B ref 7167); Fri, 08 Oct 2010 15:06:02 +0000 Received: (at 7167) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Oct 2010 15:05:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P4EVP-0003IG-5x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 11:05:07 -0400 Received: from granite1.mail.cornell.edu ([128.253.83.141] helo=authusersmtp.mail.cornell.edu) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P4EVM-0003Hr-6Z for 7167@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 11:05:05 -0400 Received: from [128.84.234.191] (markov.math.cornell.edu [128.84.234.191]) (authenticated bits=0) by authusersmtp.mail.cornell.edu (8.14.4/8.12.10) with ESMTP id o98F8Krg002223 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 8 Oct 2010 11:08:20 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4CAF33E5.7030508@cornell.edu> Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 11:08:21 -0400 From: Ken Brown User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4CAD419F.3020305@gmail.com> <4CAD4510.4000702@gmail.com> <83pqvloork.fsf@gnu.org> <83eic1nh8w.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83eic1nh8w.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.7 (-----) On 10/8/2010 5:52 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Found the problem. There's nothing wrong with the Windows build > system per se. The problem is that emacs-23.2 tarball comes with a > src/buildobj.h from a Unix system where it was tarred, which is > baaaaad, and not only on Windows. This causes Make not to create > src/buildobj.h as suitable for the actual build on the target > platform, and the rest is history. > > I've just installed a fix in the emacs-23 branch (revno 100091 and a > followup change in 100092) to exclude this file from the tarball. > > To fix this locally, just remove src/buildobj.h and rebuild Emacs. This also fixes bug#7127. I'll write a separate message about that. Ken