GNU bug report logs - #71646
29.3; pixel-scroll-precision-mode overrides paging behaviour even when pixel-scroll-precision-interpolate-page is off

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: luangruo <at> yahoo.com
Cc: mike <at> bulsara.com, 71646 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#71646: 29.3; pixel-scroll-precision-mode overrides paging behaviour even when pixel-scroll-precision-interpolate-page is off
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2024 12:24:43 +0300

Ping! Should I close this?

> Cc: mike <at> bulsara.com, 71646 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 11:43:51 +0300
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
> 
> > From: Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com>
> > Cc: mike <at> bulsara.com,  71646 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> > Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2024 16:24:28 +0800
> > 
> > Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> > 
> > > Ping!
> > >
> > >> Cc: 71646 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> > >> Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2024 10:54:54 +0300
> > >> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
> > >> 
> > >> Po Lu, how can we make some progress here?
> > >> 
> > >> > From: Mike Woolley <mike <at> bulsara.com>
> > >> > Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 11:10:15 +0100
> > >> > Cc: Po Lu <luangruo <at> yahoo.com>,
> > >> >  71646 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> > >> > 
> > >> > Sorry Eli,
> > >> > 
> > >> > I had replied, but forgot to CC the list :-)
> > 
> > I suspect that if you make this mistake and correct it afterwards the
> > entire thread will be classified as spam...
> > 
> > >> > What I was saying was: of course I can remove the bindings from the map myself (& indeed that’s what I've
> > >> > done), but my point is why should I have to?
> > >> > Why is a feature that’s turned off still having an effect? I think this is unnecessary and surprising to users (at
> > >> > least it was to me)!
> > >> > 
> > >> > I was thinking this paging animation feature might be better as it’s own minor mode, which would do the right
> > >> > thing with keymaps and is how the other features in the same file are implemented?
> > 
> > Yes, but that ship sailed with the release of Emacs 29.  It's too late
> > to change any of these mechanics.
> 
> So should we close this bug as wontfix, then?
> 
> 
> 
> 

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.