From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:12:04 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#71626 <71626@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#71626 <71626@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: build of /gnu/store/5mzanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-guix-package-cache.drv failed Reply-To: bug#71626 <71626@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 14:12:04 +0000 retitle 71626 build of /gnu/store/5mzanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-guix-pac= kage-cache.drv failed reassign 71626 guix submitter 71626 danclm@tutanota.com severity 71626 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jun 18 03:55:36 2024 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jun 2024 07:55:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41390 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sJTgm-0008HX-Ex for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 03:55:36 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:52378) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sJNWO-0005xp-Hi for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 21:20:29 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sJNWL-00045H-Rr for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 21:20:25 -0400 Received: from w1.tutanota.de ([81.3.6.162]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sJNWK-0001Y4-9D for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 21:20:25 -0400 Received: from tutadb.w10.tutanota.de (unknown [192.168.1.10]) by w1.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC7D3FBFADC for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 01:20:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1718673621; s=s1; d=tutanota.com; h=From:From:To:To:Subject:Subject:Content-Description:Content-ID:Content-Type:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:Date:In-Reply-To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:References:Sender; bh=vOMjXp72E4bJFUWzxPTN5D23Wp5gYIuuXFKXS3Z+8Rw=; b=SpoHCGepokZ+yPxVvGrtvJCb2AD1DMfTUMiNCJkRAvLJlHVuc6Yf/9jzn8UKny/c mN5mA60TalQ0LZIo9ZOv2teE7DlH7nfsbJbGmSKzx1C240XRRlHpUOQZlj1dImC+kN2 GT9OXDde0EkIZhdSlCalvC75lkyW5XDrgHPU4kC/u74e4I2UEb3o1qxUsizZBHEOeY+ MuXE/VtTjQwK/2uNBRQ/8MuSuJADFmYeDPSDOh8aEANavK91aKraOkW34ZCwPp6vKVi Gr5IWIW4B9ovxOoI5h9r+Rgn5CRa9cQ03n1N+RqBQ1VJ6tVmHaUFGcpakqigRK2sFox jE77bIcpaQ== Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 03:20:21 +0200 (CEST) From: danclm@tutanota.com To: Bug Guix Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: build of /gnu/store/5mzanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-guix-package-cache.drv failed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=81.3.6.162; envelope-from=danclm@tutanota.com; helo=w1.tutanota.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.9 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 03:55:34 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) After a few more attempts guix pull was successful.=C2=A0I don't know what = happened, I think it was still right to report it. --=20 Jun 17, 2024, 23:41 by danclm@tutanota.com: > Hi Guix, > I'm getting this bug when attempting to guix pull (it persists with an ol= der generation): > > build of /gnu/store/5mzanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-guix-package-cache.d= rv failed > hint: This usually indicates a bug in one of the channels you are pulling= from, or some incompatibility among them.=C2=A0 You can check the build lo= g > and report the issue to the channel developers. > > The channels you are pulling from are: guix. > > View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/5m/zanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-g= uix-package-cache.drv.gz'. > cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/r7v8j9pgaw3sc3wjmchd99arjp527w73-prof= ile.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built > guix pull: error: build of `/gnu/store/r7v8j9pgaw3sc3wjmchd99arjp527w73-p= rofile.drv' failed > > (repl-version 0 1 1) > Generating package cache for '/gnu/store/gxhl3fny25a9d1rmpl9fr9h8brd1ng4m= -profile'... > > Backtrace: > In gnu/packages.scm: > =C2=A0=C2=A0 439:11 19 (generate-package-cache _) > In srfi/srfi-1.scm: > =C2=A0=C2=A0 460:18 18 (fold # _ _) > In gnu/packages.scm: > =C2=A0=C2=A0 399:37 17 (expand-cache . _) > In guix/packages.scm: > =C2=A0 1411:17 16 (supported-package? # ?) > In guix/memoization.scm: > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 101:0 15 (_ # # ?) > In guix/packages.scm: > =C2=A0 1381:14 14 (_) > In srfi/srfi-1.scm: > =C2=A0=C2=A0 460:18 13 (fold # ?) > In guix/packages.scm: > =C2=A0 1385:44 12 (_ _ ("x86_64-linux" "i686-linux")) > In guix/memoization.scm: > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 101:0 11 (_ # # ?) > In guix/packages.scm: > =C2=A0 1381:14 10 (_) > In srfi/srfi-1.scm: > =C2=A0=C2=A0 460:18=C2=A0 9 (fold # ?) > In guix/packages.scm: > =C2=A0 1385:44=C2=A0 8 (_ _ ("x86_64-linux" "i686-linux")) > In guix/memoization.scm: > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 101:0=C2=A0 7 (_ # = # ?) > In guix/packages.scm: > =C2=A0 1389:39=C2=A0 6 (_) > =C2=A0 1651:16=C2=A0 5 (package->bag _ _ _ #:graft? _) > =C2=A0 1755:47=C2=A0 4 (thunk) > In gnu/packages/linux.scm: > =C2=A0 9981:25=C2=A0 3 (native-inputs #) > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > =C2=A0 1685:16=C2=A0 2 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _) > =C2=A0 1780:13=C2=A0 1 (_ #<&compound-exception components: (#<&undefined= -vari?>) > In unknown file: > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 0 (backtrace= #) > > (exception unbound-variable (value #f) (value "Unbound variable: ~S") (va= lue (linux-libre-headers-6.8)) (value #f)) > > Thank you, > Best regards > > -- > > From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jun 18 04:28:21 2024 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jun 2024 08:28:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41569 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sJUCT-0000lZ-B4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 04:28:21 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:40766) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sJUCS-0000lS-26 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 04:28:20 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sJUCP-0008Rn-8i for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 04:28:17 -0400 Received: from msg-2.mailo.com ([213.182.54.12] helo=mailo.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sJUCN-0001ET-NS for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 04:28:17 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nicolasgoaziou.fr; s=mailo; t=1718699293; bh=mjk9opiy9S/oF7iFHaU5v4BwCl4KvUjXlWtsrG/IuSI=; h=X-EA-Auth:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date: Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Os9y7PYWm48jhLjM0958HRLtuKU3fLmr0MF8QFmSu/kUZcd7qLodChZ5zhsKfH6WQ Y9efXmnJHkJ7J968Jnv7YnaEs0Q9eVaaMitulYCjJCUuSA2Cy380bvwWZrMx4hQAN0 lIoCUKNC/RSdn5Yl0rb32Y/fV6WWV3XON6UDu/tk= Received: by b221-8.in.mailobj.net [192.168.90.28] with ESMTP via ip-20.mailobj.net [213.182.54.20] Tue, 18 Jun 2024 10:28:13 +0200 (CEST) X-EA-Auth: w+Wyto96rN12orL75H6HldZKttQMRA9fsq0Ay/XVXC0s6Hi3LbcR4PCW8bLJ0ylBoinIZD8/F6SfzwbQIAacZqusfsvvkWxOHOmd+lxzNs4= From: Nicolas Goaziou To: danclm--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix Subject: Re: bug#71626: build of /gnu/store/5mzanz9linxs05ypxf1fil639gs2nard-guix-package-cache.drv failed In-Reply-To: (danclm's message of "Tue, 18 Jun 2024 03:20:21 +0200 (CEST)") References: Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 10:27:56 +0200 Message-ID: <87iky6wt83.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=213.182.54.12; envelope-from=mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr; helo=mailo.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: danclm@tutanota.com, 71626-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) Hello, danclm--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix writes: > After a few more attempts guix pull was successful.=C2=A0I don't know what > happened, I think it was still right to report it. An erroneous commit made "guix pull" fail. The problem was fixed a few hours after having been introduced. Unfortunately, you guix pulled during the time frame it was still present. Now, everything is in order again. Sorry for the inconvenience! Regards, --=20 Nicolas Goaziou From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:12:04 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 11:24:13 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator