GNU bug report logs -
#71577
Some Images jobset lack artifacts
Previous Next
Full log
Message #13 received at 71577 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello Ludo,
On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 8:49 AM Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>
> > I wanted to try a fresh guix in a VM, but the "Download / Latest"
> > page (1) does not have the:
> > "QCOW2 virtual machine (VM) image"
> > "GNU Guix 1.4.0 QEMU Image"
> > that is available on the "Download / Standard" page (2)
>
> This is now fixed:
>
> https://guix.gnu.org/en/download/latest/
>
> For the record, the problem was that we’d be removing GC roots too
> early, which was fixed here:
>
>
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/maintenance.git/commit/?id=489fc437c7b3aa0af41a40d6090eb4c51ced0028
>
Yes, I remember seeing some discussion about this.
But I tried to have a new look at :
https://guix.gnu.org/en/download/latest/
But with another browser, another computer, reloading the page in firefox,
or even forced reloading (CTRL+F5) I'm still not seeing the x86_64 qcow2.
Is there some propagation delay, or something on my side that is wrong ?
> > BTW, DL latest page also lacks checksum files to verify integrity.
>
> Since this process is automated, there cannot be a signature to verify
> the authenticity of those binaries (integrity is most likely verified
> indirectly via embedded checksums in the container formats).
>
That's why I spoke about checksum and not signatures, I'm not talking
about authenticity, but just about DL checking.
I don't really know if qcow has integrated checksums, but I doubt raw
image does. So I think this could still have some usefulness.
Thanks
--
Vincent Legoll
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 9 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.