GNU bug report logs -
#71572
[PATCH] seconds-to-string-approximate
Previous Next
Reported by: JD Smith <jdtsmith <at> gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 17:25:01 UTC
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Merged with 71573
Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #84 received at 71572 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
JD Smith <jdtsmith <at> gmail.com> writes:
>> On Dec 7, 2024, at 8:02 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
>>
>>> From: JD Smith <jdtsmith <at> gmail.com>
>>> Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2024 13:58:52 -0500
>>> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>,
>>> Adam Porter <adam <at> alphapapa.net>,
>>> jonas <at> bernoul.li,
>>> Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
>>>
>>> I was recently reminded of the need for a more capable seconds-to-string.
>>>
>>> Anyone have any additional comments on this proposed patch? If not,
>>> I'd suggest someone with access
>>> merges.
>>
>> A few minor nits below, and then we can install:
>
> Thanks. Updated patch below.
Thanks for working on this. I gave a quick try and noticed some
amounts aren’t pluralized how I expect; e.g.
(seconds-to-string 36541462 'expanded nil 1)
;; "1 year 1.9 month"
(seconds-to-string 73082924 'expanded nil 2)
;; "2 year 3.79 months"
(seconds-to-string 2511822 'expanded nil 3)
;; "4 week 1.072 day"
I would expect those to output:
1 year 1.9 months
2 years 3.79 months
4 weeks 1.072 days
According to the Chicago Manual of Style all fractional values are
plural, even 1.0, 2.0 &c.
The incorrect “2 year”, “4 week” only happen when PRECISION is
non-nil; e.g.
(seconds-to-string 2511822 'expanded nil)
"4 weeks 1 day"
p.s. There is a missing “is” in the last sentence of the docstring
for seconds-to-string.
This bug report was last modified 154 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.