GNU bug report logs - #71559
[PATCH] gnu: Add ruby-3.3.

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 71559 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 71559 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Cc: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add ruby-3.3.
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 19:24:45 +0200

* gnu/packages/ruby.scm (ruby-3.3): New variable.

Change-Id: Ie26b97fdcea75e7eddabb2dba3fc91882be41b34
---
 gnu/packages/ruby.scm | 14 ++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/ruby.scm b/gnu/packages/ruby.scm
index 5c1e666bb0..9547481caf 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/ruby.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/ruby.scm
@@ -292,6 +292,20 @@ (define-public ruby-3.2
      (modify-inputs (package-inputs ruby-3.1)
        (prepend libyaml)))))
 
+(define-public ruby-3.3
+  (package
+    (inherit ruby-3.2)
+    (version "3.3.3")
+    (source
+     (origin
+       (method url-fetch)
+       (uri (string-append "http://cache.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/"
+                           (version-major+minor version)
+                           "/ruby-" version ".tar.xz"))
+       (sha256
+        (base32
+         "07pwf3zkf7idl95agfjbv2lvamcp0spp0znqp9arb71ri19rkh43"))))))
+
 (define-public ruby ruby-3.1)
 
 (define-public mruby

base-commit: 7770e4140cddd5dc9c9879cb2bfcbd6cd4de59a0
-- 
2.45.1

Message #10 received at 71559-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
To: Daniel Littlewood <danielittlewood <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 71559-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>,
 help-guix <help-guix <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Ruby without RVM - what to do if the version I want is missing?
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2024 12:27:21 +0200

Hello,

Am Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 07:36:07PM +0200 schrieb Andreas Enge:
> (define-public ruby-3.3
>   (package
>     (inherit ruby-3.2)
>     (version "3.3.3")
>     (source
>      (origin
>        (method url-fetch)
>        (uri (string-append "http://cache.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/"
>                            (version-major+minor version)
>                            "/ruby-" version ".tar.xz"))
>        (sha256
>         (base32
>          "07pwf3zkf7idl95agfjbv2lvamcp0spp0znqp9arb71ri19rkh43"))))))
> I have sent this patch, see
>    https://issues.guix.gnu.org/71559

QA has given the green light, so I have pushed this new version to master.
You should see it after a "guix pull".

Andreas

Message #13 received at 71559-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Daniel Littlewood <danielittlewood <at> gmail.com>
To: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
Cc: 71559-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>,
 help-guix <help-guix <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Ruby without RVM - what to do if the version I want is missing?
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 20:09:13 +0100

Hi, thank you all very much for the help,

Thank you Andreas for your patch. I wasn't sure quite how to use it at
first, but after some looking I found out I could put it into a local
channel. So I made a file ~/my-channel/ruby.scm with contents

(define-module (ruby)
  #:use-module (guix packages)
  #:use-module (guix licenses)
  #:use-module (guix download)
  #:use-module (guix utils)
  #:use-modules (gnu packages ruby))
<the contents of your patch here>

That worked well.
guix shell ruby <at> 3.3 # fails as expected
guix shell -L ~/guix-scout ruby <at> 3.3 # works
ruby --version
ruby 3.3.3 (2024-06-12 revision f1c7b6f435) [x86_64-linux]

However I wanted to have a more sophisticated guix shell, called from
a file. Something like what Remco suggested, but this was just what I
could cobble together and it isn't exactly the same.

The file guix.scm contains (by the way, why is the use-modules syntax
different here?)
(use-modules (guix packages)
                       (guix download)
                       (guix utils)
                       (guix build-system ruby)
                       (ruby))
(package
  (name "my-project")
  (version "1.0.0")
  (license #f)
  (source #f)
  (build-system ruby-build-system) ; "no build system" was not an option
  (propagated-inputs (list ruby-3.3))
  (synopsis "")
  (description "")
  (homepage ""))

Now I become confused:
guix shell -L ~/my-channel -D -f guix.scm # works, as expected
ruby --version
ruby 3.1.4p223 (2023-03-30 revision 957bb7cb81) [x86_64-linux]
# this is *not* the host ruby:
exit
ruby --version
ruby 2.7.8p225 (2023-03-30 revision 1fd455848) [x86_64-linux]

I don't know where it is getting 3.1.4 from! I have not written it
anywhere. I do recognise it - I think I have previously installed it
at some point. But I don't know where it's being pulled from - some
cache? It looks like Remco's approach using manifests should work, but
I wonder: does anyone know what's wrong with my guix.scm?

Best wishes,
Dan

On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 11:27 AM Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Am Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 07:36:07PM +0200 schrieb Andreas Enge:
> > (define-public ruby-3.3
> >   (package
> >     (inherit ruby-3.2)
> >     (version "3.3.3")
> >     (source
> >      (origin
> >        (method url-fetch)
> >        (uri (string-append "http://cache.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/"
> >                            (version-major+minor version)
> >                            "/ruby-" version ".tar.xz"))
> >        (sha256
> >         (base32
> >          "07pwf3zkf7idl95agfjbv2lvamcp0spp0znqp9arb71ri19rkh43"))))))
> > I have sent this patch, see
> >    https://issues.guix.gnu.org/71559
>
> QA has given the green light, so I have pushed this new version to master.
> You should see it after a "guix pull".
>
> Andreas
>

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.