GNU bug report logs - #71554
29.3; eshell-command async buffer behavior

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Christopher Howard <christopher <at> librehacker.com>

Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 13:58:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 29.3

Done: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Thierry Volpiatto <thievol <at> posteo.net>
To: Thierry Volpiatto <thievol <at> posteo.net>
Cc: jporterbugs <at> gmail.com, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, christopher <at> librehacker.com, 71554 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#71554: 29.3; eshell-command async buffer behavior
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2024 14:34:01 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Thierry Volpiatto <thievol <at> posteo.net> writes:

> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
>>> From: Thierry Volpiatto <thievol <at> posteo.net>
>>> Cc: Thierry Volpiatto <thievol <at> posteo.net>,  jporterbugs <at> gmail.com,
>>>   71554 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,  christopher <at> librehacker.com
>>> Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2024 06:24:23 +0000
>>> 
>>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>>> 
>>> >> > Why do we have to make this change in Emacs 30?  AFAIU, it isn't a
>>> >> > bug, just inconsistency between shell-mode and Eshell, and we have
>>> >> > lived with it for quite some time.  Right?
>>> >> 
>>> >> We have lived with this because the eshell-command async behavior was
>>> >> broken from 2005 to 2021. Now it is repaired the need of beeing able to
>>> >> run several processes raise.
>>> >> 
>>> >> > I'd like to have as short a pretest for Emacs 30.1 as possible, and
>>> >> > that means no changes we don't absolutely have to make.  Please
>>> >> > consider the necessity of this change from that POV.
>>> >> 
>>> >> Now we have a emacs-31 branch, perhaps this can be installed there?
>>> >
>>> > There's no emacs-31, only emacs-30 and master.  The master branch will
>>> > eventually become Emacs 31, so if you mean to install there, I'm okay
>>> > with that, of course.
>>> 
>>> Yes, I meant install in master, sorry.
>>
>> That's fine by me, thanks.
>
> Good, Jim, do you want me to modify the patch or you modify the default yourself?

Here the patch modified (only changed default value, a typo and the
commit message).

-- 
Thierry
[0001-Allow-using-multiple-buffers-in-eshell-command-bug-7.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 318 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.