GNU bug report logs - #71554
29.3; eshell-command async buffer behavior

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Christopher Howard <christopher <at> librehacker.com>

Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 13:58:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 29.3

Done: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Thierry Volpiatto <thievol <at> posteo.net>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: Thierry Volpiatto <thievol <at> posteo.net>, jporterbugs <at> gmail.com, christopher <at> librehacker.com, 71554 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#71554: 29.3; eshell-command async buffer behavior
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2024 06:24:23 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Thierry Volpiatto <thievol <at> posteo.net>
>> Cc: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>,  thievol <at> posteo.net,
>>   71554 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,  christopher <at> librehacker.com
>> Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2024 04:09:43 +0000
>> 
>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>> 
>> >> Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 22:36:47 -0700
>> >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, 71554 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
>> >>  christopher <at> librehacker.com
>> >> From: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>
>> >> 
>> >> Eli, what do you think about merging this into the Emacs 30 branch? I 
>> >> have no strong preference myself, but I think it's small enough that it 
>> >> should be safe, and it fixes an annoyance with Eshell today. (I can also 
>> >> write a regression test or two if that would help matters.)
>> >
>> > Why do we have to make this change in Emacs 30?  AFAIU, it isn't a
>> > bug, just inconsistency between shell-mode and Eshell, and we have
>> > lived with it for quite some time.  Right?
>> 
>> We have lived with this because the eshell-command async behavior was
>> broken from 2005 to 2021. Now it is repaired the need of beeing able to
>> run several processes raise.
>> 
>> > I'd like to have as short a pretest for Emacs 30.1 as possible, and
>> > that means no changes we don't absolutely have to make.  Please
>> > consider the necessity of this change from that POV.
>> 
>> Now we have a emacs-31 branch, perhaps this can be installed there?
>
> There's no emacs-31, only emacs-30 and master.  The master branch will
> eventually become Emacs 31, so if you mean to install there, I'm okay
> with that, of course.

Yes, I meant install in master, sorry.

-- 
Thierry
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 319 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.