GNU bug report logs - #71554
29.3; eshell-command async buffer behavior

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Christopher Howard <christopher <at> librehacker.com>

Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 13:58:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 29.3

Done: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #41 received at 71554 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Thierry Volpiatto <thievol <at> posteo.net>
Cc: thievol <at> posteo.net, jporterbugs <at> gmail.com, christopher <at> librehacker.com,
 71554 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#71554: 29.3; eshell-command async buffer behavior
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2024 08:46:29 +0300
> From: Thierry Volpiatto <thievol <at> posteo.net>
> Cc: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>,  thievol <at> posteo.net,
>   71554 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,  christopher <at> librehacker.com
> Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2024 04:09:43 +0000
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 22:36:47 -0700
> >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, 71554 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
> >>  christopher <at> librehacker.com
> >> From: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>
> >> 
> >> Eli, what do you think about merging this into the Emacs 30 branch? I 
> >> have no strong preference myself, but I think it's small enough that it 
> >> should be safe, and it fixes an annoyance with Eshell today. (I can also 
> >> write a regression test or two if that would help matters.)
> >
> > Why do we have to make this change in Emacs 30?  AFAIU, it isn't a
> > bug, just inconsistency between shell-mode and Eshell, and we have
> > lived with it for quite some time.  Right?
> 
> We have lived with this because the eshell-command async behavior was
> broken from 2005 to 2021. Now it is repaired the need of beeing able to
> run several processes raise.
> 
> > I'd like to have as short a pretest for Emacs 30.1 as possible, and
> > that means no changes we don't absolutely have to make.  Please
> > consider the necessity of this change from that POV.
> 
> Now we have a emacs-31 branch, perhaps this can be installed there?

There's no emacs-31, only emacs-30 and master.  The master branch will
eventually become Emacs 31, so if you mean to install there, I'm okay
with that, of course.




This bug report was last modified 318 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.