GNU bug report logs - #71503
30.0.50; pcase-lambda (with "and" and "guard") does not work as expected

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>, Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: mekeor <at> posteo.de, 71503 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#71503: 30.0.50; pcase-lambda (with "and" and "guard") does not work as expected
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 11:37:02 +0300

> Cc: 71503 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
> Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 08:42:25 +0000
> 
> Mekeor Melire <mekeor <at> posteo.de> writes:
> 
> > I was expecting these two expressions to evaluate to the same value.
> > First, we call `pcase' on a value with a pattern involving `and' and
> > `guard':
> >
> >     (pcase "value"
> >       ((and v (guard (string= "not-value" v))) v))
> >     ;; => nil
> >
> > Second, let's use the same value and pattern, but this time using
> > `pcase-lambda':
> >
> >     (funcall
> >       (pcase-lambda
> >         ((and v (guard (string= "not-value" v)))) v)
> >       "value")
> >     ;; => "value"
> >
> > Am I missing something or is this a bug?
> 
> The difference is that pcase-lambda doesn't do case-distinction, but
> just pattern matching/destruncting.  So if the pattern-matching fails,
> then the variable is just not bound, instead of the entire expression
> falling back to returning no value/nil.  I am guessing you wanted to
> have something like Scheme's `case-lambda'[0]?  Or we could clarify this
> point in the docstring.

Would you mind suggesting a clarification for the doc string (and the
ELisp manual as well)?

Thanks.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.