GNU bug report logs -
#71502
[PATCH][DOCUMENTATION] doc: Clarify when to use guix style when submitting patches.
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Make more explicit the need to run guix style for new packages only,
not for updates.
* doc/contributing.texi (Submitting Patches): clarify the fourth item
of the checklist.
Change-Id: I69e1a6144b4da4814d2c8d9b44c7f77490183556
---
A newbie like me can easily miss the "new" here and mix guix style with
other changes. So let’s make it extra clear.
doc/contributing.texi | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/contributing.texi b/doc/contributing.texi
index b8adc169d8..33ef94bba3 100644
--- a/doc/contributing.texi
+++ b/doc/contributing.texi
@@ -1891,8 +1891,10 @@ name of the new or modified package, and fix any errors it reports
(@pxref{Invoking guix lint}).
@item
-Run @code{guix style @var{package}} to format the new package definition
-according to the project's conventions (@pxref{Invoking guix style}).
+For a new package, run @code{guix style @var{package}} to format the package
+definition according to the project's conventions (@pxref{Invoking guix style}).
+For an update to an existing package, it’s better to skip this step, as it
+would make reviewing the changes harder.
@item
Make sure the package builds on your platform, using @code{guix build
--
2.45.1
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 4 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.