GNU bug report logs -
#71499
[PATCH] Make whitespace.el cleanup add missing final newline
Previous Next
Full log
Message #38 received at 71499 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
>>>>> On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 07:55:19 +0000, Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com> said:
Stefan> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>>> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>
>>> Cc: Andrea Corallo <acorallo <at> gnu.org>, 71499 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
>>> stefankangas <at> gmail.com, bkhl <at> elektrubadur.se
>>> Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 14:23:17 +0200
>>>
>>> >>>>> On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 11:30:51 +0300, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> said:
>>> >> I'm as well for having the patch in, but I guess would be safer in 31 so
>>> >> we have plenty of time to react if needed.
>>>
Eli> OK, thanks. I will then install after the branch is cut.
>>>
Eli> Meanwhile, Björn, I have a few comments to the patch:
>>>
Eli> . it needs a NEWS entry announcing the new feature
Eli> . is there any reason your code to handle the missing newline is not
Eli> identical to what the implementation of require-final-newline
Eli> does?
>>>
>>> Iʼm going to chime in and say that, even though I highlight missing
>>> newlines at eob, I donʼt normally set `require-final-newline' to t,
>>> because of various reasons involving collaboration with others. So Iʼd
>>> have to turn this off once it goes in.
Stefan> Could you explain why you'd need to turn it off?
Stefan> Do you usually use `whitespace-cleanup` on files where you collaborate
Stefan> with others, but then you specifically don't want to ever touch newlines
Stefan> at eob?
Yes. I guess I could turn off whitespace-cleanup for those files, and
complain at those people more loudly :-) . I donʼt have a strong
objection to this feature, so we donʼt have to add
yet-another-config-variable just for me.
Robert
--
This bug report was last modified 1 year and 22 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.